Cited by 156Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

A dynamic network simulation of the nematode tap withdrawal circuit: predictions concerning synaptic function using behavioral criteria

Open access
Wicks, Stephen R., Roehrig, Chris J., Rankin, Catharine H.·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The nematode tap withdrawal reflex demonstrates several forms of behavioral plasticity. Although the neural connectivity that supports this behavior is identified (Integration of mechanosensory stimuli in Caenorhabditis elegans, Wicks and Rankin, 1995, J Neurosci 15:2434–2444), the neurotransmitter phenotypes, and hence whether the synapses in the circuit are excitatory or inhibitory, remain uncharacterized. Here we use a novel strategy to predict the polarity configuration, i.e., the array of excitatory and inhibitory connections, of the nematode tap withdrawal circuit using an anatomically and physiologically justifiable dynamic network simulation of that circuit. The output of the modeled circuit was optimized to the behavior of animals, which possessed circuits altered by surgical ablation by exhaustively enumerating an array of synaptic signs that constituted the modeled circuit. All possible polarity configurations were then compared, and a statistical analysis was used to determine whether, for a given synaptic class, a particular polarity was associated with a good fit to behavioral data. The results from four related experiments were used to predict the polarities of seven of the nine cell classes of the tap withdrawal circuit. In addition, the model was used to assess possible roles for two novel mechanosensory integration neurons: DVA and PVD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-12-04017.1996

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shortage of electrophysiological data has been the main reason few neuroanatomically-grounded models of C. elegans behavior have been undertaken.

    “Indeed, the shortage of electrophysiological data has been the main reason that few neuroanatomically-grounded models of C. elegans behavior have been undertaken, despite the fact that its connectome has been known for over 25 years (e.g., [57], [58]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wicks, S. R., Roehrig, C. J., & Rankin, C. H.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-06-15
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
4017-4031
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1628168006
Cited by
156
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
Caenorhabditis elegans, excitatory and inhibitory synapses, dynamic network simulation, behavioral plasticity, PVD neuron, synaptic connectivity, surgical ablation
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Mechanoreceptors, Models, Neurological, Synapses, Caenorhabditis elegans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review