A dynamic network simulation of the nematode tap withdrawal circuit: predictions concerning synaptic function using behavioral criteria
Open accessAbstract
The nematode tap withdrawal reflex demonstrates several forms of behavioral plasticity. Although the neural connectivity that supports this behavior is identified (Integration of mechanosensory stimuli in Caenorhabditis elegans, Wicks and Rankin, 1995, J Neurosci 15:2434–2444), the neurotransmitter phenotypes, and hence whether the synapses in the circuit are excitatory or inhibitory, remain uncharacterized. Here we use a novel strategy to predict the polarity configuration, i.e., the array of excitatory and inhibitory connections, of the nematode tap withdrawal circuit using an anatomically and physiologically justifiable dynamic network simulation of that circuit. The output of the modeled circuit was optimized to the behavior of animals, which possessed circuits altered by surgical ablation by exhaustively enumerating an array of synaptic signs that constituted the modeled circuit. All possible polarity configurations were then compared, and a statistical analysis was used to determine whether, for a given synaptic class, a particular polarity was associated with a good fit to behavioral data. The results from four related experiments were used to predict the polarities of seven of the nine cell classes of the tap withdrawal circuit. In addition, the model was used to assess possible roles for two novel mechanosensory integration neurons: DVA and PVD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The shortage of electrophysiological data has been the main reason few neuroanatomically-grounded models of C. elegans behavior have been undertaken.
“Indeed, the shortage of electrophysiological data has been the main reason that few neuroanatomically-grounded models of C. elegans behavior have been undertaken, despite the fact that its connectome has been known for over 25 years (e.g., [57], [58]).”
From Connecting a Connectome to Behavior: An Ensemble of Neuroanatomical Models of C. elegans Klinotaxis (2013) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589 · cited 19× · see citing works
“The adult nematode possesses only 302 neurons, each completely described in terms of location and morphology (Ward et al., 1975; Ware et al., 1975; White et al., 1986; Hall and Russell, 1991).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEmerging principles governing the operation of neural networks
Getting, P. A. (1989) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.001153 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Hall, D., & Russell, R. (1991) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.11-01-00001.1991 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A circuit for navigation in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
Gray, J. M., Hill, J. J., & Bargmann, C. I. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409009101 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
The Rich Club of the<i>C. elegans</i>Neuronal Connectome
Towlson, E. K., Vértes, P. E., Ahnert, S. E., Schafer, W. R., & Bullmore, E. T. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3784-12.2013 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Neural signal propagation atlas of Caenorhabditis elegans
Randi, F., Sharma, A. K., Dvali, S., & Leifer, A. M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Connecting a Connectome to Behavior: An Ensemble of Neuroanatomical Models of C. elegans Klinotaxis
Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002890 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“, [57], [58]).”
Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0374 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Sherlekar, A. L., Janssen, A., Siehr, M. S., Koo, P. K., Caflisch, L., Boggess, M., & Lints, R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060597 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Olivares, E. O., Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2018) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00036 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Until more evidence is available, and in line with previous models (Izquierdo & Beer, 2013; Kunert et al., 2017; Wicks et al., 1996), the model assumes electrical synapses are nonrectifying.”
ResultAn integrative data-driven model simulating C. elegans brain, body and environment interactions
Zhao, M., Wang, N., Jiang, X., Ma, X., Ma, H., He, G., Du, K., Ma, L., & Huang, T. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00738-w · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Graded synapses, including excitatory and inhibitory synapses, were modeled according to published C. elegans models 9,40,41 .”
Neural network model to generate head swing in locomotion of <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
Sakata, K., & Shingai, R. (2004) · Network: Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x_15_3_003
- Authors
- Wicks, S. R., Roehrig, C. J., & Rankin, C. H.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1996-06-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4017-4031
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6578605
- OpenAlex
- W1628168006
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- Caenorhabditis elegans, excitatory and inhibitory synapses, dynamic network simulation, behavioral plasticity, PVD neuron, synaptic connectivity, surgical ablation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Mechanoreceptors, Models, Neurological, Synapses, Caenorhabditis elegans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review