The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synchronous Activity in Locus Coeruleus Results from Dendritic Interactions in Pericoerulear Regions
Open accessAbstract
Locus coeruleus (LC) neurons in brain slices from adult rats were studied using intracellular and extracellular recordings to investigate synchronous activity. Spontaneous field potentials were recorded with extracellular electrodes in solutions containing tetraethylammonium chloride (10 m m) and BaCl 2(1 m m). These field potentials were found throughout but not outside the LC cell body region. No field potentials were observed in control solutions. Paired recordings showed that field potentials were synchronous in all areas of the LC. The synchronous activity was resistant to tetrodotoxin (1 μ m) and to the neurotransmitter receptor blockers d-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid, bicuculline, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, idazoxan, and strychnine, suggesting that this activity was not synaptically driven. Field potentials were also synchronous with oscillations in membrane potential recorded with intracellular electrodes. The oscillations in membrane potential were 5–30 mV in amplitude and had a biphasic waveform. Neither the frequency nor the waveform of the oscillations was dependent on the membrane potential. The glycyrrhetinic acid derivative carbenoxolone and intracellular acidification with CO 2 disrupted synchronous activity, suggesting a role of electrotonic coupling. When the cell body region of the LC was isolated from the pericoerulear dendritic regions by sectioning the slice rostral and caudal to the cell body region, synchronous activity was reduced or abolished. Dendritic interaction in the pericoerulear region was also indicated by improved voltage control of the opioid-induced potassium current, as indicated by a shift in the reversal potential to the potassium equilibrium potential. The results suggest that electrical interactions between dendrites outside the cell body region can account for synchronous activity within the nucleus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 · Cited by 4,472
Berridge, C. W., & Waterhouse, B. D. (2003) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(03)00143-7 · Cited by 2,529
Orexin A activates locus coeruleus cell firing and increases arousal in the rat
Hagan, J. J., Leslie, R. A., Patel, S., Evans, M. L., Wattam, T. A., Holmes, S., Benham, C. D., Taylor, S. G., Routledge, C., Hemmati, P., et al. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.19.10911 · Cited by 1,234
Role of locus coeruleus in attention and behavioral flexibility
Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., & Cohen, J. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00140-7 · Cited by 900
Cellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Williams, J. T., Christie, M. J., & Manzoni, O. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.299 · Cited by 848
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishimatsu, M., & Williams, J. T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1996-08-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5196-5204
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2160688299
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synchronous Activity in Locus Coeruleus Results from Dendritic Interactions in Pericoerulear Regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05196.1996
- The paper
- Ishimatsu, M., & Williams, J. T. (1996). Synchronous Activity in Locus Coeruleus Results from Dendritic Interactions in Pericoerulear Regions. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05196.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.