Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optic Flow Processing in Monkey STS: A Theoretical and Experimental Approach

Open access
Lappe, Markus, Bremmer, Frank, Pekel, Martin, Thiele, Alexander, Hoffmann, Klaus-Peter·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

How does the brain process visual information about self-motion? In monkey cortex, the analysis of visual motion is performed by successive areas specialized in different aspects of motion processing. Whereas neurons in the middle temporal (MT) area are direction-selective for local motion, neurons in the medial superior temporal (MST) area respond to motion patterns. A neural network model attempts to link these properties to the psychophysics of human heading detection from optic flow. It proposes that populations of neurons represent specific directions of heading. We quantitatively compared single-unit recordings in area MST with single-neuron simulations in this model. Predictions were derived from simulations and subsequently tested in recorded neurons. Neuronal activities depended on the position of the singular point in the optic flow. Best responses to opposing motions occurred for opposite locations of the singular point in the visual field. Excitation by one type of motion is paired with inhibition by the opposite motion. Activity maxima often occur for peripheral singular points. The averaged recorded shape of the response modulations is sigmoidal, which is in agreement with model predictions. We also tested whether the activity of the neuronal population in MST can represent the directions of heading in our stimuli. A simple least-mean-square minimization could retrieve the direction of heading from the neuronal activities with a precision of 4.3°. Our results show good agreement between the proposed model and the neuronal responses in area MST and further support the hypothesis that area MST is involved in visual navigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-19-06265.1996

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Lappe, M., Bremmer, F., Pekel, M., Thiele, A., & Hoffmann, K.-P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-10-01
Volume
16
Issue
19
Pages
6265-6285
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2116575895
Cited by
163
References
4
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optic Flow Processing in Monkey STS: A Theoretical and Experimental Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-19-06265.1996
The paper
Lappe, M., Bremmer, F., Pekel, M., Thiele, A., & Hoffmann, K.-P. (1996). Optic Flow Processing in Monkey STS: A Theoretical and Experimental Approach. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-19-06265.1996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.