Cited by 228Cell death mechanisms and regulationAutophagy in Disease and TherapyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Metabolic and Genetic Analyses of Apoptosis in Potassium/Serum-Deprived Rat Cerebellar Granule Cells

Open access
Miller, Timothy M., Johnson Jr., Eugene M.·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Cerebellar granule cells maintained in medium containing serum and 25 m m potassium undergo an apoptotic death within 96 hr when switched to serum-free medium with 5 m m potassium. Because large numbers of apparently homogeneous neurons can be obtained, this represents a potentially useful model of neuronal programmed cell death (PCD). Analysis of the time course and extent of death after removal of either serum or K+alone demonstrated that a fast-dying (T1/2= 4 hr) population (20%) responded to serum deprivation, whereas a slow-dying (T1/2= 25 hr) population (80%) died in response to K+deprivation. Taking advantage of the complete death after removing both K+and serum, changes in metabolic events and mRNA levels were analyzed in this model. Glucose uptake, protein synthesis, and RNA synthesis fell to <35% of control by 9 hr after potassium/serum deprivation, a time when 85% of the cells were still viable. The pattern of the fall in these metabolic parameters was similar to that reported for trophic factor-deprived sympathetic neurons. Most mRNAs decreased markedly after K+/serum deprivation. Levels of c-jun mRNA increased fivefold in potassium/serum-deprived granule cells;c-jun is required for cell death of sympathetic neurons. mRNA levels of cyclin D1,c-myb,collagenase, and transin remained relatively constant in potassium/serum-deprived granule cells. These data demonstrate the existence of two populations of granule cells with respect to cell death and define common metabolic and genetic events involved in neuronal PCD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-23-07487.1996

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The point-of-no-return for CGN apoptosis takes place within the first 6 h of deprivation, and onset of apoptosis can be observed at 6 h post-deprivation by phosphorylation of c-Jun and activation of caspase-3.

    “The point-of-no-return for the CGN apoptosis takes place within the first 6 h of deprivation, and the onset of apoptosis can be observed at 6 h postdeprivation by phosphorylation of c-Jun, the central transcription factor required for JNK-dependent apoptosis, and activation of caspase-3, a major executioner of apoptosis [22,26,27].”

    From PCSK9 regulates neuronal apoptosis by adjusting ApoER2 levels and signaling (2012) · cites this paper as [22]

    In “Loss of cell viability and K⁺/serum rescue” (page not available), the paper places the commitment point—when 50% of cells can no longer be rescued—at approximately 12 hours, not within the first 6 hours. “Analysis of gene expression” reports increased c-jun mRNA by 3 hours, but does not establish apoptosis onset at 6 hours through c-Jun phosphorylation or caspase-3 activation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Estus S (1996) Optimization and validation of RT-PCR as a tool to analyze apoptotic gene expression. In: NeuroMethods (Poirier J, ed). New York: Elsevier, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, T. M., & Johnson Jr., E. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-12-01
Volume
16
Issue
23
Pages
7487-7495
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2125779862
Cited by
228
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG012947, AG-12947)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 24679, R01NS024679)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
apoptosis, cerebellar granule cells, potassium deprivation, serum deprivation, glucose uptake, protein synthesis, RNA synthesis, mRNA levels, trophic factor deprivation, sympathetic neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Physiological Phenomena, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Cerebellum, Potassium, Potassium Deficiency, Gene Expression, Culture Media, Serum-Free, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Apoptosis, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review