The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific C-Receptors for Itch in Human Skin
Open accessAbstract
In microneurography experiments 56 unmyelinated nerve fibers were studied in the cutaneous branch of the peroneal nerve of healthy volunteers. Units were identified with the “marking” technique as mechanically and heat-responsive (CMH;n= 30), heat-responsive (CH;n= 13), or unresponsive to mechanical and heat stimulation (CM i H i;n= 13). None of the units showed spontaneous activity. These units were tested for responsiveness to iontophoresis of histamine (1 mA, 20 sec) from a small probe (diameter, 6 mm), which induced itch sensations lasting several minutes. Twenty-three units were unresponsive to histamine, and 25 units responded weakly with a few spike discharges after iontophoresis. Eight units, however, responded with sustained discharges to histamine, and their discharge patterns were matching the time course of the itch sensations. All C-units in this group were mechanically insensitive, and five of them were heat-responsive. They had very low conduction velocities of only 0.5 m/sec, on average, which is significantly lower than conduction velocities of the “polymodal” CMH units. This slow conduction velocities attributable to small axon diameters may be one reason why these units have not been encountered in previous studies. Histamine-sensitive C-units had very large innervation territories extending up to a diameter of 85 mm on the lower leg. We conclude that these C-fibers represent a new class of afferent nerve fibers with particularly thin axons but excessive terminal branching. This type of C-fiber probably represents the afferent units long searched for mediating itch sensations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Interoception in anxiety and depression
Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0258-9 · Cited by 952
Cevikbas, F., Wang, X., Akiyama, T., Kempkes, C., Savinko, T., Antal, A., Kukova, G., Buhl, T., Ikoma, A., Buddenkotte, J., et al. (2014) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.048 · Cited by 804
A gastrin-releasing peptide receptor mediates the itch sensation in the spinal cord
Sun, Y.-G., & Chen, Z.-F. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06029 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmelz, M., Schmidt, R., Bickel, A., Handwerker, H. O., & Torebjörk, H. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1997-10-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8003-8008
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2105176852
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific C-Receptors for Itch in Human Skin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.17-20-08003.1997
- The paper
- Schmelz, M., Schmidt, R., Bickel, A., Handwerker, H. O., & Torebjörk, H. E. (1997). Specific C-Receptors for Itch in Human Skin. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.17-20-08003.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.