Noradrenergic Excitation and Inhibition of GABAergic Cell Types in Rat Frontal Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Noradrenaline (NA) from the locus coeruleus and GABA from intracortical nonpyramidal cells exert strong influences on cortical activity. To assess possible interaction between the two, the effects of noradrenergic agonists on spontaneous GABAergic IPSCs as well as on the activity of identified GABAergic cell types were investigated by in vitro whole-cell recordings from the frontal cortex of 18- to 22-d-old rats. NA (3-50 microM) and an alpha-adrenergic agonist, 6-fluoronorepinephrine (FNE; 30-50 microM), induced an increase of IPSC frequency in pyramidal cells, but a beta-adrenergic agonist did not. This increase was reduced by tetrodotoxin, bicuculline, and alpha-adrenergic antagonists, suggesting that GABAergic cells are excited via alpha-adrenoceptors. Fast-spiking or late-spiking cells were depolarized by application of NA or FNE, but none demonstrated spike firings. The former morphologically included common multipolar cells with extended axonal arborizations as well as chandelier cells, and the latter neurogliaform cells. Most somatostatin-immunoreactive regular or burst-spiking cells, including Martinotti cells and wide arbor cells, were depolarized and accompanied by spike firing. In a few cases this was preceded by hyperpolarization. Cholecystokinin-immunoreactive regular or burst-spiking nonpyramidal cells, including large basket cells, were affected heterogeneously: depolarization, hyperpolarization followed by depolarization, or hyperpolarization resulted. The findings suggest that, similar to the effects of acetylcholine, the excitability of cortical GABAergic cell types is differentially regulated by NA and that NA actions are similar to cholinergic ones in some GABAergic cell types but not in others.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GABAergic interneuron subtypes vary in their responses to acetylcholine, serotonin, noradrenaline, and dopamine, which affect neocortical circuit function and brain-state-dependent dynamics.
“GABAergic interneuron subtypes also vary in their response to neuromodulators such as acetylcholine (Ach), serotonin (5-HT), noradrenaline and dopamine, which profoundly affect the function of neocortical circuits and are responsible for dynamic changes associated with different brain states and behavioral contexts”
From GABAergic Interneurons in the Neocortex: From Cellular Properties to Circuits (2016) · cites this paper as Kawaguchi and Shindou, 1998
The section “Differential monoaminergic and cholinergic modulation among GABAergic cell types” reports differing subtype responses to noradrenaline and acetylcholine and describes subtype-specific serotonin receptor expression. It says dopamine is considered to affect cortical activity, but only suggests that other monoaminergic inputs may regulate GABAergic cell types differentially; it does not establish differing subtype responses to dopamine. The introduction links noradrenaline and acetylcholine to arousal and cortical activation, but does not establish the full four-modulator claim about brain-state and behavioral-context dynamics. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSST+ interneurons and a subset of PV+ interneurons are depolarized by activation of α-adrenergic receptors.
“In addition to being influenced by cholinergic and serotonergic signalling, SST+ interneurons and a subset of PV+ interneurons are also depolarized by activation of α-adrenergic receptors209.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [209]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 230
- Authors
- Kawaguchi, Y., & Shindou, T.
- Affiliations
- RIKEN (JP)
- ORCID
- Kawaguchi, Yasuo
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6963-6976
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6792977
- OpenAlex
- W1907932603
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- RIKEN
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- norepinephrine, GABAergic interneurons, frontal cortex, alpha-adrenergic receptors, spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents, cholinergic modulation, Martinotti cells, basket cells, chandelier cells, neurogliaform cells, locus coeruleus
- MeSH terms
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Animals, Cholecystokinin, Frontal Lobe, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Neural Inhibition, Norepinephrine, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha, Somatostatin, Tetrodotoxin, Rats, Wistar, Pyramidal Cells, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Rats, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review