The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting the Consequences of Our Own Actions: The Role of Sensorimotor Context Estimation
Open accessAbstract
During self-generated movement it is postulated that an efference copy of the descending motor command, in conjunction with an internal model of both the motor system and environment, enables us to predict the consequences of our own actions (von Helmholtz, 1867; Sperry, 1950;von Holst, 1954; Wolpert, 1997). Such a prediction is evident in the precise anticipatory modulation of grip force seen when one hand pushes on an object gripped in the other hand (Johansson and Westling, 1984;Flanagan and Wing, 1993). Here we show that self-generation is not in itself sufficient for such a prediction. We used two robots to simulate virtual objects held in one hand and acted on by the other. Precise predictive grip force modulation of the restraining hand was highly dependent on the sensory feedback to the hand producing the load. The results show that predictive modulation requires not only that the movement is self-generated, but also that the efference copy and sensory feedback are consistent with a specific context; in this case, the manipulation of a single object. We propose a novel computational mechanism whereby the CNS uses multiple internal models, each corresponding to a different sensorimotor context, to estimate the probability that the motor system is acting within each context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion
Sperry, R. W. (1950) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055479 · Cited by 1,789
Movement, posture and equilibrium: Interaction and coordination
Massion, J. (1992) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(92)90034-c · Cited by 1,647
Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher
Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1603_1 · Cited by 1,451
Cited by
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception
Grush, R. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000093 · Cited by 1,387
Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010 · Cited by 1,050
How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation
den Ouden, H. E. M., Kok, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00548 · Cited by 512
Prediction Precedes Control in Motor Learning
Flanagan, J. R., Vetter, P., Johansson, R. S., & Wolpert, D. M. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00007-1 · Cited by 494
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Blakemore, S. J., Goodbody, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-09-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7511-7518
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2096356851
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting the Consequences of Our Own Actions: The Role of Sensorimotor Context Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07511.1998
- The paper
- Blakemore, S. J., Goodbody, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Predicting the Consequences of Our Own Actions: The Role of Sensorimotor Context Estimation. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07511.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.