The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UV- and Midwave-Sensitive Cone-Driven Retinal Responses of the Mouse: A Possible Phenotype for Coexpression of Cone Photopigments
Open accessAbstract
Molecular biological, histological and flicker electroretinographic results have established that mice have two cone photopigments, one peaking near 350 nm (UV-cone pigment) and a second near 510 nm [midwave (M)-cone pigment]. The goal of this investigation was to measure the action spectra and absolute sensitivities of the UV-cone- and M-cone-driven b-wave responses of C57BL/6 mice. To achieve this goal, we suppressed rod-driven signals with steady or flashed backgrounds and obtained intensity–response relations for cone-driven b-waves elicited by narrowband flashes between 340 and 600 nm. The derived cone action spectra can be described as retinal 1 pigments with peaks at 355 and 508 nm. The UV peak had an absolute sensitivity of ∼8 nV/(photon μm 2) at the cornea, approximately fourfold higher than the M peak. In an attempt to isolate UV-cone-driven responses, it was discovered that an orange conditioning flash (λ > 530 nm) completely suppressed ERG signals driven by both M pigment- and UV pigment-containing cones. Analysis showed that the orange flash could not have produced a detectable response in the UV-cone pathway were their no linkage between M pigment- and UV pigment-generated signals. Because cones containing predominantly the UV and M pigments have been shown to be located largely in separate parts of the mouse retina (Szel et al., 1992), the most probable linkage is coexpression of M pigment in cones primarily expressing UV pigment. New histological evidence supports this interpretation (Gloesman and Ahnelt, 1998). Our data are consistent with an upper bound of ∼3% coexpression of M pigment in the cones that express mostly the UV pigment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pugh, E. N., Falsini, B., & Lyubarsky, A. L. (1998) · Photostasis and Related Phenomena · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1549-8_7 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
Cited by
Bennicelli, J., Wright, J. F., Komaromy, A., Jacobs, J. B., Hauck, B., Zelenaia, O., Mingozzi, F., Hui, D., Chung, D., Rex, T. S., et al. (2008) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.mt.6300389 · Cited by 267
Leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations and its treatment with gene therapy
Cideciyan, A. V. (2010) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.04.002 · Cited by 256
Van Hooser, J. P., Aleman, T. S., He, Y.-G., Cideciyan, A. V., Kuksa, V., Pittler, S. J., Stone, E. M., Jacobson, S. G., & Palczewski, K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.150236297 · Cited by 252
Distribution and Density of Medium- and Short-wavelength Selective Cones in the Domestic Pig Retina
Hendrickson, A., & Hicks, D. (2002) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1006/exer.2002.1181 · Cited by 183
Spectral organization of the eye of a butterfly, Papilio
Arikawa, K. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0454-7 · Cited by 155
“…multiple visual pigments are expressed in single cells or where spectral filtering sharpens the spectral sensitivities, may be encountered in many other animals, both in vertebrates (Lyubarsky et al. 1999; Makino and Dodd 1996) and in invertebrates (Marshall et al. 1991; Sakamoto et al. 1996).”
Znoiko, S. L., Rohrer, B., Lu, K., Lohr, H. R., Crouch, R. K., & Ma, J.-X. (2005) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0653 · Cited by 146
Cone Opsin Mislocalization in Rpe65−/−Mice: A Defect That Can Be Corrected by 11-cis Retinal
Rohrer, B., Lohr, H. R., Humphries, P., Redmond, T. M., Seeliger, M. W., & Crouch, R. K. (2005) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0533 · Cited by 133
Generation of Cre Transgenic Mice with Postnatal RPE-Specific Ocular Expression
Iacovelli, J., Zhao, C., Wolkow, N., Veldman, P., Gollomp, K., Ojha, P., Lukinova, N., King, A., Feiner, L., Esumi, N., et al. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6347 · Cited by 89
Surace, E. M., Auricchio, A., Reich, S. J., Rex, T., Glover, E., Pineles, S., Tang, W., O'Connor, E., Lyubarsky, A., Savchenko, A., et al. (2003) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.77.14.7957-7963.2003 · Cited by 46
Self-citationDanskin, B., Denman, D., Valley, M., Ollerenshaw, D., Williams, D., Groblewski, P., Reid, C., Olsen, S., & Waters, J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144760 · Cited by 46
Caruso, R. C., Aleman, T. S., Cideciyan, A. V., Roman, A. J., Sumaroka, A., Mullins, C. L., Boye, S. L., Hauswirth, W. W., & Jacobson, S. G. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5559 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyubarsky, A. L., Falsini, B., Pennesi, M. E., Valentini, P., & Pugh, E. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 442-455
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1578653675
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
