Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Glial Scarring and Progressive Cavitation:In Vivo and In Vitro Analysis of Inflammation-Induced Secondary Injury after CNS Trauma

Open access
Fitch, Michael T., Doller, Catherine, Combs, Colin K., Landreth, Gary E., Silver, Jerry·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Post-traumatic cystic cavitation, in which the size and severity of a CNS injury progress from a small area of direct trauma to a greatly enlarged secondary injury surrounded by glial scar tissue, is a poorly understood complication of damage to the brain and spinal cord. Using minimally invasive techniques to avoid primary physical injury, this study demonstrates in vivo that inflammatory processes alone initiate a cascade of secondary tissue damage, progressive cavitation, and glial scarring in the CNS. An in vitro model allowed us to test the hypothesis that specific molecules that stimulate macrophage inflammatory activation are an important step in initiating secondary neuropathology. Time-lapse video analyses of inflammation-induced cavitation in our in vitro model revealed that this process occurs primarily via a previously undescribed cellular mechanism involving dramatic astrocyte morphological changes and rapid migration. The physical process of cavitation leads to astrocyte abandonment of neuronal processes, neurite stretching, and secondary injury. The macrophage mannose receptor and the complement receptor type 3 β2-integrin are implicated in the cascade that induces cavity and scar formation. We also demonstrate that anti-inflammatory agents modulating transcription via the nuclear hormone receptor peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ may be therapeutic in preventing progressive cavitation by limiting inflammation and subsequent secondary damage after CNS injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-19-08182.1999

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Cited by

See all 600

Metadata

Authors
Fitch, M. T., Doller, C., Combs, C. K., Landreth, G. E., & Silver, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-10-01
Volume
19
Issue
19
Pages
8182-8198
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2115352319
Cited by
600
References
77
FWCI
11.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Glial Scarring and Progressive Cavitation:In Vivo and In Vitro Analysis of Inflammation-Induced Secondary Injury after CNS Trauma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.19-19-08182.1999
The paper
Fitch, M. T., Doller, C., Combs, C. K., Landreth, G. E., & Silver, J. (1999). Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Glial Scarring and Progressive Cavitation:In Vivo and In Vitro Analysis of Inflammation-Induced Secondary Injury after CNS Trauma. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-19-08182.1999

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.