The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dopamine D4 Receptor-Knock-Out Mice Exhibit Reduced Exploration of Novel Stimuli
Open accessAbstract
The involvement of dopamine neurotransmission in behavioral responses to novelty is suggested by reports that reward is related to increased dopamine activity, that dopamine modulates exploratory behavior in animals, and that Parkinson's disease patients report diminished responses to novelty. Some studies have reported that polymorphisms of the human dopamine D4 receptor (D4R) gene are associated with personality inventory measures of the trait called “novelty-seeking”. To explore a potential role for the D4R in behavioral responses to novelty, we evaluated D4R-knock-out (D4R−/−) and wild-type (D4R+/+) mice in three approach–avoidance paradigms: the open field, emergence, and novel object tests. These three paradigms differ in the degree to which they elicit approach, or exploratory behavior, and avoidance, or anxiety-related behavior. Thus, we used these three tests to determine whether the D4R primarily influences the exploratory or the anxious component of responses to approach–avoidance conflicts. D4R−/− mice were significantly less behaviorally responsive to novelty than D4R+/+ mice in all three tests. The largest phenotypic differences were observed in the novel object test, which maximizes approach behavior, and the smallest phenotypic differences were found in the open field test, which maximizes avoidance behavior. Hence, D4R−/− mice exhibit reductions in behavioral responses to novelty, reflecting a decrease in novelty-related exploration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modulation of intracellular cyclic AMP levels by different human dopamine D4 receptor variants
Asghari, V., Sanyal, S., Buchwaldt, S., Paterson, A., Jovanovic, V., & Van Tol, H. H. M. (1995) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65031157.x · Cited by 858
Localization of dopamine D4 receptors in GABAergic neurons of the primate brain
Mrzljak, L., Bergson, C., Pappy, M., Huff, R., Levenson, R., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381245a0 · Cited by 494
Cited by
Dopamine and the regulation of cognition and attention
Nieoullon, A. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00011-4 · Cited by 1,131
Measuring normal and pathological anxiety-like behaviour in mice: a review
Belzung, C., & Griebel, G. (2001) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00291-1 · Cited by 912
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05 · Cited by 888
Effects of Chronic Fluoxetine in Animal Models of Anxiety and Depression
Dulawa, S. C., Holick, K. A., Gundersen, B., & Hen, R. (2004) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300433 · Cited by 671
Self-citationAdult hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in anxiety-related behaviors
Revest, J.-M., Dupret, D., Koehl, M., Funk-Reiter, C., Grosjean, N., Piazza, P.-V., & Abrous, D. N. (2009) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2009.15 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Dulawa, S. C., Grandy, D. K., Low, M. J., Paulus, M. P., & Geyer, M. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 9550-9556
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1513017963
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.