Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The General Anesthetic Propofol Slows Deactivation and Desensitization of GABAAReceptors

Open access
Bai, Donglin, Pennefather, Peter S., MacDonald, John F., Orser, Beverley A.·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) has multiple actions on GABA A receptor function that act in concert to potentiate GABA-evoked currents. To understand how propofol influences inhibitory IPSCs, we examined the effects of propofol on responses to brief applications of saturating concentrations of GABA (1–30 m m). GABA was applied using a fast perfusion system to nucleated patches excised from hippocampal neurons. In this preparation, propofol (10 μ m) had no detectable agonist effect but slowed the decay, increased the charge transfer (62%), and enhanced the peak amplitude (8%) of currents induced by brief pulses (3 msec) of GABA. Longer pulses (500 msec) of GABA induced responses that desensitized with fast (τ f= 1.5–4.5 msec) and slow (τ s= 1–3 sec) components and, after the removal of GABA, deactivated exponentially (τ d= 151 msec). Propofol prolonged this deactivation (τ d= 255 msec) and reduced the development of both fast and slow desensitization. Recovery from fast desensitization, assessed using pairs of brief pulses of GABA, paralleled the time course of deactivation, indicating that fast desensitization traps GABA on the receptor. With repetitive applications of pulses of GABA (0.33 Hz), the charge transfer per pulse declined exponentially (τ ≈ 15 sec) to a steady-state value equal to ∼40% of the initial response. Despite the increased charge transfer per pulse with propofol, the time course of the decline was unchanged. These experimental data were interpreted using computer simulations and a kinetic model that assumed fast and slow desensitization, as well as channel opening developed in parallel from a pre-open state. Our results suggest that propofol stabilizes the doubly liganded pre-open state without affecting the isomerization rate constants to and from the open state. Also, the rate constants for agonist dissociation and entry into the fast and slow desensitization states were reduced by propofol. The recovery rate constant from fast desensitization was slowed, whereas that from slow desensitization appeared to be unchanged. Taken together, the effects of propofol on GABA A receptors enhance channel opening, particularly under conditions that promote desensitization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-24-10635.1999

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Bai, D., Pennefather, P. S., MacDonald, J. F., & Orser, B. A.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-12-15
Volume
19
Issue
24
Pages
10635-10646
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2150456903
Cited by
197
References
2
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The General Anesthetic Propofol Slows Deactivation and Desensitization of GABAAReceptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.19-24-10635.1999
The paper
Bai, D., Pennefather, P. S., MacDonald, J. F., & Orser, B. A. (1999). The General Anesthetic Propofol Slows Deactivation and Desensitization of GABAAReceptors. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-24-10635.1999

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.