Cited by 153Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Recurrent spontaneous spreading depolarizations facilitate acute dendritic injury in the ischemic penumbra

Open access
Risher, W. C., Ard, D., Yuan, J., Kirov, S. A.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Spontaneous spreading depolarizations (SDs) occur in the penumbra surrounding ischemic core. These SDs, often referred to as peri-infarct depolarizations, cause vasoconstriction and recruitment of the penumbra into the ischemic core in the critical first hours after focal ischemic stroke; however, the real-time spatiotemporal dynamics of SD-induced injury to synaptic circuitry in the penumbra remain unknown. A modified cortical photothrombosis model was used to produce a square-shaped lesion surrounding a penumbra-like "area at risk" in middle cerebral artery territory of mouse somatosensory cortex. Lesioning resulted in recurrent spontaneous SDs. In vivo two-photon microscopy of green fluorescent protein-expressing neurons in this penumbra-like area at risk revealed that SDs were temporally correlated with rapid (<6 s) dendritic beading. Dendrites quickly (<3 min) recovered between SDs to near-control morphology until the occurrence of SD-induced terminal dendritic injury, signifying acute synaptic damage. SDs are characterized by a breakdown of ion homeostasis that can be recovered by ion pumps if the energy supply is adequate. Indeed, the likelihood of rapid dendritic recovery between SDs was correlated with the presence of nearby flowing blood vessels, but the presence of such vessels was not always sufficient for rapid dendritic recovery, suggesting that energy needs for recovery exceeded energy supply of compromised blood flow. We propose that metabolic stress resulting from recurring SDs facilitates acute injury at the level of dendrites and dendritic spines in metabolically compromised tissue, expediting penumbral recruitment into the ischemic core.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1917-10.2010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In traumatic brain injury, mechanical forces applied to the cranium and brain cause irreversible primary neuronal and astroglial damage associated with terminal dendritic beading and spine loss, representing acute damage to synaptic circuitry.

    “In traumatic brain injury mechanical forces applied to the cranium and brain cause irreversible primary neuronal and astroglial damage associated with terminal dendritic beading and spine loss representing acute damage to synaptic circuitry.”

    From Evolution of neuronal and astroglial disruption in the peri-contusional cortex of mice revealed by in vivo two-photon imaging (2013) · cites this paper as Risher et al., 2010

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the absence of reperfusion, as seen in the ischaemic core, dendrites remain terminally beaded and spines are lost.

    “and in the absence of reperfusion, as seen in the ischaemic core, dendrites remain terminally beaded and spines are lost (Zhang and Murphy, 2007;Risher et al., 2010).”

    From Evolution of neuronal and astroglial disruption in the peri-contusional cortex of mice revealed by in vivo two-photon imaging (2013) · cites this paper as Risher et al., 2010

    The Results section (‘Successive rounds of dendritic beading and recovery coincide with passage of SDs’; page unavailable) reports terminal beading and complete spine loss. The Discussion links irreversible injury to insufficient blood flow, but the experiments imaged the ischemic penumbra, not dendrites in an unreperfused ischemic core. The core-specific condition in the claim is therefore not directly supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Terminal dendritic beading is indicative of an irreversible acute neuronal injury and is an early sign of cell death pathway activation.

    “Concurrently, terminal dendritic beading is indicative of an irreversible acute neuronal injury (Hori and Carpenter, 1994;Risher et al., 2010), and it is an early sign of cell death pathway activation (Enright et al., 2007).”
  • Spreading depolarizations facilitate injury to fine synaptic circuitry within the ischaemic penumbra.

    “Spreading depolarizations facilitate injury to fine synaptic circuitry within the ischaemic penumbra (Risher et al., 2010)”
  • Stroke-induced spreading depolarizations result in dendritic beading in metabolically compromised tissue that is reversible if neurons are not severely energetically compromised.

    “Stroke-induced spreading depolarizations result in dendritic beading in metabolically compromised tissue that is reversible if neurons are not severely energetically compromised (Murphy et al., 2008;Risher et al., 2010).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 153

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Holtmaat AJ Wilbrecht L Karpova A Portera-Cailliau C Burbach B Trachtenberg T Svoboda K 2005 Long-term, high-resolution imaging of neurons in the neocortex in vivo Imaging in Neuroscience and Development: A Laboratory Manual Yuste R Konnerth A Cold Spring Harbor Cold spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Authors
Risher, W. C., Ard, D., Yuan, J., & Kirov, S. A.
Affiliations
Augusta University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-07-21
Volume
30
Issue
29
Pages
9859-9868
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2073402789
Cited by
153
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS057113, F31NS064753, NS057113, NS064753)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
peri-infarct depolarization, ischemic penumbra, focal ischemic stroke, ion homeostasis, energy metabolism, somatosensory cortex, two-photon microscopy
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Ischemia, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Dendrites, Electroencephalography, Image Enhancement, Mice, Transgenic, Recurrence, Somatosensory Cortex, Cortical Spreading Depression, Ultrasonography, Dendritic Spines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review