The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional Coupling between Neurons and Glia
Open accessAbstract
Neuronal–glial interactions play an important role in information processing in the CNS. Previous studies have indicated that electrotonic coupling between locus ceruleus (LC) neurons is involved in synchronizing the spontaneous activity. The results of the present study extend the functional electrotonic coupling to interactions between neurons and glia. Spontaneous oscillations in the membrane potential were observed in a subset of glia. These oscillations were synchronous with the firing of neurons, insensitive to transmitter receptor antagonists and disrupted by carbenoxolone, a gap junction blocker. Hyperpolarization of neurons with [Met]5 enkephalin blocked the oscillations in glia. Selective depolarization of glia with a glutamate transporter substrate (l-α-aminoadipic acid) increased the neuronal firing rate, suggesting that changes in the membrane potential of glia can modulate neuronal excitability through heterocellular coupling. Dye-coupling experiments further confirmed that small molecules could be transferred through gap junctions between these distinct cell types. No dye transfer was observed between neurons and oligodendrocytes or between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, suggesting that the junctional communication was specific for astrocytes and neurons. Finally, immunoelectron microscopy studies established that connexins, the proteins that form gap junctions, were present on portions of the plasmalemma, bridging the cytoplasm of neurons and glia in LC. This heterocellular coupling extends the mechanisms by which glia participate in the network properties of the LC in which the degree of coupling is thought to influence cognitive performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Berridge, C. W., & Waterhouse, B. D. (2003) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(03)00143-7 · Cited by 2,529
Verkhratsky, A., & Nedergaard, M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2016 · Cited by 1,678
Cellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Williams, J. T., Christie, M. J., & Manzoni, O. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.299 · Cited by 848
Self-citationAstrocyte calcium waves: What they are and what they do
Scemes, E., & Giaume, C. (2006) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.20374 · Cited by 600
A neuron–glia signalling network in the active brain
Bezzi, P., & Volterra, A. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00223-3 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvarez-Maubecin, V., García-Hernández, F., Williams, J. T., & Van Bockstaele, E. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4091-4098
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2171377877
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Coupling between Neurons and Glia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.20-11-04091.2000
- The paper
- Alvarez-Maubecin, V., García-Hernández, F., Williams, J. T., & Van Bockstaele, E. J. (2000). Functional Coupling between Neurons and Glia. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.20-11-04091.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.