Unusual target selectivity of perisomatic inhibitory cells in the hilar region of the rat hippocampus
Open accessAbstract
Perisomatic inhibitory innervation of all neuron types profoundly affects their firing characteristics and vulnerability. In this study we examined the postsynaptic targets of perisomatic inhibitory cells in the hilar region of the dentate gyrus where the proportion of potential target cells (excitatory mossy cells and inhibitory interneurons) is approximately equal. Both cholecystokinin (CCK)- and parvalbumin-immunoreactive basket cells formed multiple contacts on the somata and proximal dendrites of mossy cells. Unexpectedly, however, perisomatic inhibitory terminals arriving from these cell types largely ignored hilar GABAergic cell populations. Eighty-ninety percent of various GABAergic neurons including other CCK-containing basket cells received no input from CCK-positive terminals. Parvalbumin-containing cells sometimes innervated each other but avoided 75% of other GABAergic cells. Overall, a single mossy cell received 40 times more CCK-immunoreactive terminals and 15 times more parvalbumin-positive terminals onto its soma than the cell body of an average hilar GABAergic cell. In contrast to the pronounced target selectivity in the hilar region, CCK- and parvalbumin-positive neurons innervated each other via collaterals in stratum granulosum and moleculare. Our observations indicate that the inhibitory control in the hilar region is qualitatively different from other cortical areas at both the network level and the level of single neurons. The paucity of perisomatic innervation of hilar interneurons should have profound consequences on their action potential generation and on their ensemble behavior. These findings may help explain the unique physiological patterns observed in the hilus and the selective vulnerability of the hilar cell population in various pathophysiological conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FS cells have low input resistance and a very fast time constant, perhaps due in part to developmentally regulated TASK-3 leak K+ channels.
“Low input resistance, and very fast time constant perhaps due in part to the developmentally-regulated expression of TASK-3 leak K+ channels3,4”
From GABAergic Interneurons in the Neocortex: From Cellular Properties to Circuits (2016) · cites this paper as [3]
The passages on hilar interneuron connections and functional implications describe synaptic wiring, not the intrinsic properties of fast-spiking cells. Searches of our copy for TASK-3 leak K+ channels, low input resistance, and a fast time constant found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPV-expressing interneurons in CA1 and DG innervate each other as evidenced by synaptic boutons originating from this subtype at symmetric synapses along the somatodendritic axis of postsynaptic PV labeled interneurons.
“PV-expressing interneurons in CA1 and DG innervate each other as evidenced by the identification of synaptic boutons originating from this subtype at symmetric synapses, indicative of an inhibitory phenotype, along the somatodendritic axis of postsynaptic PV labeled interneurons (8, 440).”
From Hippocampal GABAergic Inhibitory Interneurons (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Acsády, L., Katona, I., Martı́nez-Guijarro, F. J., Buzsáki, G., & Freund, T. F.
- Affiliations
- HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine (HU)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2000-09-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 6907-6919
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6772844
- OpenAlex
- W1675041590
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hungarian Scientific Research Fund
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH054671, MH54671)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 41301, P30DK041301)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- perisomatic inhibition, target selectivity, basket cells, cholecystokinin, parvalbumin, mossy cells, GABAergic interneurons, inhibitory interneurons, synaptogenesis, stratum granulosum, stratum moleculare, hippocampus
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Cholecystokinin, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Interneurons, Male, Neural Inhibition, Parvalbumins, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide, Rats, Wistar, Presynaptic Terminals, Receptors, AMPA, Dentate Gyrus, Mossy Fibers, Hippocampal, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review