Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynorphin Promotes Abnormal Pain and Spinal Opioid Antinociceptive Tolerance

Open access
Vanderah, Todd W., Gardell, Luis R., Burgess, Shannon E., Ibrahim, Mohab, Dogrul, Ahmet, Zhong, Cheng-Min, Zhang, En-Tan, Malan, T. Philip, Ossipov, Michael H., Lai, Josephine, Porreca, Frank·2000·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The nonopioid actions of spinal dynorphin may promote aspects of abnormal pain after nerve injury. Mechanistic similarities have been suggested between opioid tolerance and neuropathic pain. Here, the hypothesis that spinal dynorphin might mediate effects of sustained spinal opioids was explored. Possible abnormal pain and spinal antinociceptive tolerance were evaluated after intrathecal administration of [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO), an opioid mu agonist. Rats infused with DAMGO, but not saline, demonstrated tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaws (during the DAMGO infusion) and a decrease in antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal opioids (tolerance), signs also characteristic of nerve injury. Spinal DAMGO elicited an increase in lumbar dynorphin content and a decrease in the mu receptor immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn, signs also seen in the postnerve-injury state. Intrathecal administration of dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum blocked tactile allodynia and reversed thermal hyperalgesia to above baseline levels (i.e., antinociception). Spinal dynorphin antiserum, but not control serum, also reestablished the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal morphine. Neither dynorphin antiserum nor control serum administration altered baseline non-noxious or noxious thresholds or affected the intrathecal morphine antinociceptive response in saline-infused rats. These data suggest that spinal dynorphin promotes abnormal pain and acts to reduce the antinociceptive efficacy of spinal opioids (i.e., tolerance). The data also identify a possible mechanism for previously unexplained clinical observations and offer a novel approach for the development of strategies that could improve the long-term use of opioids for pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.20-18-07074.2000

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Vanderah, T. W., Gardell, L. R., Burgess, S. E., Ibrahim, M., Dogrul, A., Zhong, C.-M., Zhang, E.-T., Malan, T. P., Ossipov, M. H., Lai, J., & Porreca, F.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2000-09-15
Volume
20
Issue
18
Pages
7074-7079
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2130235056
Cited by
344
References
1
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynorphin Promotes Abnormal Pain and Spinal Opioid Antinociceptive Tolerance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.20-18-07074.2000
The paper
Vanderah, T. W., Gardell, L. R., Burgess, S. E., Ibrahim, M., Dogrul, A., Zhong, C.-M., Zhang, E.-T., Malan, T. P., Ossipov, M. H., Lai, J., & Porreca, F. (2000). Dynorphin Promotes Abnormal Pain and Spinal Opioid Antinociceptive Tolerance. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.20-18-07074.2000

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.