Cited by 82Ethics in Clinical ResearchNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Neuroethics guiding principles for the NIH BRAIN initiative

Open access
Greely, Henry T., Grady, Christine, Ramos, Khara M., Chiong, Winston, Eberwine, James, Farahany, Nita A., Johnson, L. Syd M, Hyman, Bradley T. +3 more·2018·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Neuroscience presents important neuroethical considerations. Human neuroscience demands focused application of the core research ethics guidelines set out in documents such as the Belmont Report. Various mechanisms, including institutional review boards (IRBs), privacy rules, and the Food and Drug

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2077-18.2018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greely, H. T., Grady, C., Ramos, K. M., Chiong, W., Eberwine, J., Farahany, N. A., Johnson, L. S. M., Hyman, B. T., Hyman, S. E., Rommelfanger, K. S., & Serrano, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Michigan Technological University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • New Mexico State University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2018-12-12
Volume
38
Issue
50
Pages
10586-10588
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2903600064
Cited by
82
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
neuroethics, research ethics guidelines, Belmont Report, research ethics committees, privacy rules, FDA regulation
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Neurosciences, United States, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review