The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tuning and Topography in an Odor Map on the Rat Olfactory Bulb
Open accessAbstract
The sense of smell originates in a diverse array of receptor neurons, comprising up to 1000 different types. To understand how these parallel channels encode chemical stimuli, we recorded the responses of glomeruli in the olfactory bulbs of the anesthetized rat, by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Odor stimulation produced two kinds of optical responses at the surface of the bulb: a broad diffuse component superposed by discrete small spots. Histology showed that the spots correspond to individual glomeruli, and that ∼400 of them can be monitored in this way. Based on its wavelength-dependence, this optical signal appears to derive from changes in light scattering during neural activity. Pure odorants generally activated several glomeruli in a bilaterally symmetric pattern, whose extent varied greatly with concentration. A simple formalism for ligand binding accounts quantitatively for this concentration dependence and yields the effective affinity with which a glomerulus responds to an odorant. When tested with aliphatic molecules of increasing carbon chain length, many glomeruli were sharply tuned for one or two adjacent chain lengths. Glomeruli with similar tuning properties were located near each other, producing a systematic map of molecular chain length on the surface of the olfactory bulb. Given local inhibitory circuits within the olfactory bulb, this can account for the observed functional inhibition between related odors. We explore several parallels to the function and architecture of the visual system that help interpret the neural representation of odors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
Cited by
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
Coding of Odors by a Receptor Repertoire
Hallem, E. A., & Carlson, J. R. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.050 · Cited by 1,254
Molecular, Anatomical, and Functional Organization of the Drosophila Olfactory System
Couto, A., Alenius, M., & Dickson, B. J. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.034 · Cited by 984
Two-Photon Calcium Imaging Reveals an Odor-Evoked Map of Activity in the Fly Brain
Wang, J. W., Wong, A. M., Flores, J., Vosshall, L. B., & Axel, R. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00004-7 · Cited by 801
Olfaction: Diverse Species, Conserved Principles
Ache, B. W., & Young, J. M. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.022 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- Meister, M., & Bonhoeffer, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2001-02-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1351-1360
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1485458577
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuning and Topography in an Odor Map on the Rat Olfactory Bulb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.21-04-01351.2001
- The paper
- Meister, M., & Bonhoeffer, T. (2001). Tuning and Topography in an Odor Map on the Rat Olfactory Bulb. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.21-04-01351.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.