The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early Onset of Spontaneous Activity in Uninjured C-Fiber Nociceptors after Injury to Neighboring Nerve Fibers
Open accessAbstract
Ligation and transection of the L5 spinal nerve in the rat lead to behavioral signs of pain and hyperalgesia. Discharge of injured nociceptors has been presumed to play a role in generating the pain. However, A fibers, but not C fibers, in the injured L5 spinal nerve have been shown to develop spontaneous activity. Moreover, an L5 dorsal root rhizotomy does not reverse this pain behavior, suggesting that signals from other uninjured spinal nerves are involved. We asked if abnormal activity develops in an adjacent, uninjured root. Single nerve fiber recordings were made from the L4 spinal nerve after ligation and transection of the L5 spinal nerve. Within 1 d of the lesion, spontaneous activity developed in approximately half of the C fiber afferents. This spontaneous activity was at a low level (median rate, seven action potentials/5 min), originated distal to the dorsal root ganglion, and was present in nociceptive fibers with cutaneous receptive fields. The incidence and level of spontaneous activity were similar 1 week after injury. The early onset of spontaneous activity in uninjured nociceptive afferents could be the signal that produces the central sensitization responsible for the development of mechanical hyperalgesia. Because L4 afferents comingle with degenerating L5 axons in the peripheral nerve, we hypothesize that products associated with Wallerian degeneration lead to an alteration in the properties of the adjacent, uninjured afferents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ho Kim, S., & Mo Chung, J. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90041-9 · Cited by 3,069
Cited by
Mechanisms of neuropathic pain
Campbell, J. N., & Meyer, R. A. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.021 · Cited by 1,471
Self-citationThe Role of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Pain Signaling
Bennett, D. L., Clark, A. J., Huang, J., Waxman, S. G., & Dib-Hajj, S. D. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00052.2017 · Cited by 730
Beyond Neurons: Evidence That Immune and Glial Cells Contribute to Pathological Pain States
Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00011.2002 · Cited by 733
p38 MAPK, Microglial Signaling, and Neuropathic Pain
Ji, R.-R., & Suter, M. R. (2007) · Molecular Pain · doi:10.1186/1744-8069-3-33 · Cited by 624
Schäfers, M., Lee, D. H., Brors, D., Yaksh, T. L., & Sorkin, L. S. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-07-03028.2003 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, G., Ringkamp, M., Hartke, T. V., Murinson, B. B., Campbell, J. N., Griffin, J. W., & Meyer, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2001-04-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- RC140-RC140
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1582090951
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Onset of Spontaneous Activity in Uninjured C-Fiber Nociceptors after Injury to Neighboring Nerve Fibers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.21-08-j0002.2001
- The paper
- Wu, G., Ringkamp, M., Hartke, T. V., Murinson, B. B., Campbell, J. N., Griffin, J. W., & Meyer, R. A. (2001). Early Onset of Spontaneous Activity in Uninjured C-Fiber Nociceptors after Injury to Neighboring Nerve Fibers. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.21-08-j0002.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.