Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loss of the Major GABAAReceptor Subtype in the Brain Is Not Lethal in Mice

Open access
Sur, Cyrille, Wafford, Keith A., Reynolds, David S., Hadingham, Karen L., Bromidge, Frances, Macaulay, Alison, Collinson, Neil, O'Meara, Gillian, Howell, Owain, Newman, Richard, Myers, Janice, Atack, John R., Dawson, Gerard R., McKernan, Ruth M., Whiting, Paul J., Rosahl, Thomas W.·2001·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The α1β2γ2 is the most abundant subtype of the GABA A receptor and is localized in many regions of the brain. To gain more insight into the role of this receptor subtype in the modulation of inhibitory neurotransmission, we generated mice lacking either the α1 or β2 subunit. In agreement with the reported abundance of this subtype, >50% of total GABA A receptors are lost in both α1−/− and β2−/− mice. Surprisingly, homozygotes of both mouse lines are viable, fertile, and show no spontaneous seizures. Initially half of the α1−/− mice died prenatally or perinatally, but they exhibited a lower mortality rate in subsequent generations, suggesting some phenotypic drift and adaptive changes. Both adult α1−/− and β2−/− mice demonstrate normal performances on the rotarod, but β2−/− mice displayed increased locomotor activity. Purkinje cells of the cerebellum primarily express α1β2γ2 receptors, and in electrophysiological recordings from α1−/− mice GABA currents in these neurons are dramatically reduced, and residual currents have a benzodiazepine pharmacology characteristic of α2- or α3-containing receptors. In contrast, the cerebellar Purkinje neurons from β2−/− mice have only a relatively small reduction of GABA currents. In β2−/− mice expression levels of all six α subunits are reduced by ∼50%, suggesting that the β2 subunit can coassemble with α subunits other than just α1. Our data confirm that α1β2γ2 is the major GABA A receptor subtype in the murine brain and demonstrate that, surprisingly, the loss of this receptor subtype is not lethal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.21-10-03409.2001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Sur, C., Wafford, K. A., Reynolds, D. S., Hadingham, K. L., Bromidge, F., Macaulay, A., Collinson, N., O'Meara, G., Howell, O., Newman, R., Myers, J., Atack, J. R., Dawson, G. R., McKernan, R. M., Whiting, P. J., & Rosahl, T. W.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2001-05-15
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
3409-3418
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1879000632
Cited by
229
References
2
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loss of the Major GABAAReceptor Subtype in the Brain Is Not Lethal in Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.21-10-03409.2001
The paper
Sur, C., Wafford, K. A., Reynolds, D. S., Hadingham, K. L., Bromidge, F., Macaulay, A., Collinson, N., O'Meara, G., Howell, O., Newman, R., Myers, J., Atack, J. R., Dawson, G. R., McKernan, R. M., Whiting, P. J., & Rosahl, T. W. (2001). Loss of the Major GABAAReceptor Subtype in the Brain Is Not Lethal in Mice. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.21-10-03409.2001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.