Cited by 113Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationVestibular and auditory disorders

Impaired spatial performance in rats with retrosplenial lesions: importance of the spatial problem and the rat strain in identifying lesion effects in a swimming pool

Open access
Harker, K. Troy, Whishaw, Ian Q.·2002·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Behavioral, electrophysiological, and anatomical evidence suggests that retrosplenial (RS) cortex (areas RSA and RSG) plays a role in spatial navigation. This conclusion has been questioned in recent work, suggesting that it is damage to the underlying cingulum bundle (CG) (areas CG and IG), and not RS, that disrupts spatial place learning (Aggleton et al., 2000). We revisited this issue by comparing Long-Evans rats, the strain used in studies that report RS deficits, to Dark Agouti rats, the strain in which no RS deficit has been reported. Rat groups with RS, RS + CG, or no lesion were tested on a place task in a swimming pool, a test of nonspatial and spatial learning, and a matching-to-place task, a relatively selective test of spatial learning. Long-Evans rats given RS and RS + CG lesions, either before or after training on the two tasks, were impaired on both tasks, a deficit not attributable to impaired visual acuity. Control Dark Agouti rats and RS Dark Agouti rats, although not different on the place task, were both significantly impaired relative to Long-Evans rats. The RS Dark Agouti group, however, was also impaired on the matching-to-place task. Thus, we show that RS cortex is part of an extended neural circuit involved in spatial behavior in both Long-Evans and Dark Agouti rats, but its role in the place task may be masked by an innate nonspatial deficit in Dark Agouti rats. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of assessing spatial learning wit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.22-03-01155.2002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Water-maze deficits after retrosplenial lesions are not exacerbated by additional cingulum bundle damage.

    “While retrosplenial lesions impaired both reference and working memory tasks in the water maze, these deficits were not exacerbated by additional cingulum bundle damage.”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Harker and Whishaw, 2002

  • Retrosplenial lesions impair both reference and working memory tasks in the water maze.

    “While retrosplenial lesions impaired both reference and working memory tasks in the water maze, these deficits were not exacerbated by additional cingulum bundle damage.”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Harker and Whishaw, 2002

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 113

Authors
Harker, K. T., & Whishaw, I. Q.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
1155-1164
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2096639613
Cited by
113
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Lethbridge
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
retrosplenial cortex, cingulum, spatial learning, place learning, rat strain differences, Long-Evans rats, Dark Agouti rats, lesion effects, visual acuity, spatial navigation
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cerebral Decortication, Gyrus Cinguli, Male, Memory, Rats, Inbred Strains, Reaction Time, Spatial Behavior, Species Specificity, Swimming, Visual Acuity, Maze Learning, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review