μ-Opioid Receptor-Mediated Antinociceptive Responses Differ in Men and Women
Open accessAbstract
Sex differences in the experience of clinical and experimental pain have been reported. However, the neurobiological sources underlying the variability in pain responses between sexes have not been adequately explored, especially in humans. The endogenous opioid neurotransmitters and mu-opioid receptors are centrally implicated in responses to stress, in the suppression of pain, and in the action of opiate analgesic drugs. Here we examined sex differences in the activation of the mu-opioid system in response to an intensity-controlled sustained deep-tissue pain challenge with positron emission tomography and a mu-opioid receptor-selective radiotracer. Twenty-eight young healthy volunteers (14 men and 14 women) were studied during saline control and pain conditions using a double-blind, randomized, and counterbalanced design. Women were scanned during the early follicular phase of their menstrual cycles after ovulatory cycles. Significant sex differences in the regional activation of the mu-opioid system in response to sustained pain were detected compared with saline controls. Men demonstrated larger magnitudes of mu-opioid system activation than women in the anterior thalamus, ventral basal ganglia, and amygdala. Conversely, women demonstrated reductions in the basal state of activation of the mu-opioid system during pain in the nucleus accumbens, an area previously associated with hyperalgesic responses to the blockade of opioid receptors in experimental animals. These data demonstrate that at matched levels of pain intensity, men and women during their follicular phase differ in the magnitude and direction of response of the mu-opioid system in distinct brain nuclei.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Negative affective responses to pain and pain-related catastrophizing are as prominent in adolescent patients.
“negative affective responses to pain, and pain-related catastrophizing are as prominent in adolescent patients 400–402”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [401]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 363
- Authors
- Zubieta, J.-K., Smith, Y. R., Bueller, J. A., Xu, Y., Kilbourn, M. R., Jewett, D. M., Meyer, C. R., Koeppe, R. A., & Stohler, C. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-06-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5100-5107
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6757760
- OpenAlex
- W1876803907
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01de012743-03, 5r01de012059-05)
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01 DE12059, R01 DE 12743)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- mu-opioid receptor, sex differences, pain, antinociception, endogenous opioids, menstrual cycle, follicular phase, thalamus, basal ganglia, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, neuroimaging
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Amygdala, Brain, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Sex Factors, Thalamus, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Receptors, Opioid, mu
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review