Cited by 363Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyPain Management and Placebo Effect

μ-Opioid Receptor-Mediated Antinociceptive Responses Differ in Men and Women

Open access
Zubieta, Jon-Kar, Smith, Yolanda R., Bueller, Joshua A., Xu, Yanjun, Kilbourn, Michael R., Jewett, Douglas M., Meyer, Charles R., Koeppe, Robert A. +1 more·2002·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Sex differences in the experience of clinical and experimental pain have been reported. However, the neurobiological sources underlying the variability in pain responses between sexes have not been adequately explored, especially in humans. The endogenous opioid neurotransmitters and mu-opioid receptors are centrally implicated in responses to stress, in the suppression of pain, and in the action of opiate analgesic drugs. Here we examined sex differences in the activation of the mu-opioid system in response to an intensity-controlled sustained deep-tissue pain challenge with positron emission tomography and a mu-opioid receptor-selective radiotracer. Twenty-eight young healthy volunteers (14 men and 14 women) were studied during saline control and pain conditions using a double-blind, randomized, and counterbalanced design. Women were scanned during the early follicular phase of their menstrual cycles after ovulatory cycles. Significant sex differences in the regional activation of the mu-opioid system in response to sustained pain were detected compared with saline controls. Men demonstrated larger magnitudes of mu-opioid system activation than women in the anterior thalamus, ventral basal ganglia, and amygdala. Conversely, women demonstrated reductions in the basal state of activation of the mu-opioid system during pain in the nucleus accumbens, an area previously associated with hyperalgesic responses to the blockade of opioid receptors in experimental animals. These data demonstrate that at matched levels of pain intensity, men and women during their follicular phase differ in the magnitude and direction of response of the mu-opioid system in distinct brain nuclei.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.22-12-05100.2002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative affective responses to pain and pain-related catastrophizing are as prominent in adolescent patients.

    “negative affective responses to pain, and pain-related catastrophizing are as prominent in adolescent patients 400–402”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 363

Authors
Zubieta, J.-K., Smith, Y. R., Bueller, J. A., Xu, Y., Kilbourn, M. R., Jewett, D. M., Meyer, C. R., Koeppe, R. A., & Stohler, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2002-06-15
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
5100-5107
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1876803907
Cited by
363
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01de012743-03, 5r01de012059-05)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01 DE12059, R01 DE 12743)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
mu-opioid receptor, sex differences, pain, antinociception, endogenous opioids, menstrual cycle, follicular phase, thalamus, basal ganglia, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Brain, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Sex Factors, Thalamus, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Receptors, Opioid, mu

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review