The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Receptive Field Plasticity Profoundly Alters the Cutaneous Parallel Fiber Synaptic Input to Cerebellar Interneurons In Vivo
Open accessAbstract
The cutaneous parallel fiber (PF) receptive fields of cerebellar stellate and basket cells in the cerebellar C3 zone in vivo are normally very small but can be dramatically enlarged by climbing fiber (CF)-dependent plasticity. To analyze the effects of this receptive field plasticity, we present for the first time whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from these interneurons during natural and electrical activation of cutaneously driven synaptic input. In “naive” interneurons, peripheral input nearly exclusively activated a few (two to eight) large PF EPSPs from a specific small skin area that overlapped the receptive field of the local CF input. After conjunctive PF and CF stimulation, numerous small and large EPSPs and ramp-like depolarizations could be activated from the entire forelimb skin. These findings therefore confirm previous suggestions that conjunctive PF and CF activation leads to a long-lasting potentiation of PF synaptic input to interneurons. The CF response, which is crucial for the induction of the PF synaptic potentiation, was strong but variable and very different from the conventional EPSPs evoked by PFs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A network of fast-spiking cells in the neocortex connected by electrical synapses
Galarreta, M., & Hestrin, S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/47029 · Cited by 960
Cited by
Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine
Ito, M. (2006) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.02.006 · Cited by 880
Distributed synergistic plasticity and cerebellar learning
Gao, Z., van Beugen, B. J., & De Zeeuw, C. I. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3312 · Cited by 479
Jörntell, H., & Hansel, C. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.032 · Cited by 383
Self-citationOptimal Information Storage and the Distribution of Synaptic Weights
Brunel, N., Hakim, V., Isope, P., Nadal, J.-P., & Barbour, B. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.023 · Cited by 270
Ishikawa, T., Tomatsu, S., Tsunoda, Y., Lee, J., Hoffman, D. S., & Kakei, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108774 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Jörntell, H., & Ekerot, C.-F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-10-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 9620-9631
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2117908157
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Receptive Field Plasticity Profoundly Alters the Cutaneous Parallel Fiber Synaptic Input to Cerebellar Interneurons In Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.23-29-09620.2003
- The paper
- Jörntell, H., & Ekerot, C.-F. (2003). Receptive Field Plasticity Profoundly Alters the Cutaneous Parallel Fiber Synaptic Input to Cerebellar Interneurons In Vivo. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-29-09620.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.