The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dissociations and Associations between Shape and Category Representations in the Two Visual Pathways
Open accessAbstract
The dorsal and ventral visual pathways represent both visual and conceptual object properties. Yet the relative contribution of these two factors in the representational content of visual areas is unclear. Indeed, research investigating brain category representations rarely dissociate visual and semantic properties of objects. We present a human event-related fMRI study with a two-factorial stimulus set with 54 images that explicitly dissociates shape from category to investigate their independent contribution as well as their interactions through representational similarity analyses. Results reveal a contribution from each dimension in both streams, with a transition from shape to category along the posterior-to-anterior anatomical axis. The nature of category representations differs in the two pathways: ventral areas represent object animacy and dorsal areas represent object action properties. Furthermore, information about shape evolved from low-level pixel-based to high-level perceived shape following a posterior-to-anterior gradient similar to the shape-to-category emergence. To conclude, results show that representations of shape and category independently coexist, but at the same time they are closely related throughout the visual hierarchy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Research investigating visual cortex conceptual category representations rarely takes into account visual properties of objects. In this report, we explicitly dissociate shape from category and investigate independent contributions and interactions of these two highly correlated dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body
Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063414 · Cited by 2,043
Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05205.1996 · Cited by 987 · cited 2×
“…voxels [conjunction of (faces chairs) and (faces bodies)] and body-selective voxels (bodies chairs) could be defined separately in LOTC (Puce et al., 1996; Downing et al., 2001) (LOTC-face, LOTC-body) but not in VOTC (Peelen and Downing, 2005; Schwarzlose et al., 2005), where face and…”
Background
Cited by
‘What’ Is Happening in the Dorsal Visual Pathway
Freud, E., Plaut, D. C., & Behrmann, M. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.003 · Cited by 286
THINGS: A database of 1,854 object concepts and more than 26,000 naturalistic object images
Hebart, M. N., Dickter, A. H., Kidder, A., Kwok, W. Y., Corriveau, A., Van Wicklin, C., & Baker, C. I. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223792 · Cited by 281
(2021) · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01755 · Cited by 85
Concepts in the Brain: The View From Cross-linguistic Diversity
Kemmerer, D. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190682620.001.0001 · Cited by 42
Kemmerer, D. (2019) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100861 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Bracci, S., & Op de Beeck, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2016-01-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 432-444
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2340573780
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissociations and Associations between Shape and Category Representations in the Two Visual Pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2314-15.2016
- The paper
- Bracci, S., & Op de Beeck, H. (2016). Dissociations and Associations between Shape and Category Representations in the Two Visual Pathways. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2314-15.2016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.