Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organization of the Human Trichromatic Cone Mosaic

Hofer, Heidi, Carroll, Joseph, Neitz, Jay, Neitz, Maureen, Williams, David R.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Using high-resolution adaptive-optics imaging combined with retinal densitometry, we characterized the arrangement of short- (S), middle- (M), and long- (L) wavelength-sensitive cones in eight human foveal mosaics. As suggested by previous studies, we found males with normal color vision that varied in the ratio of L to M cones (from 1.1:1 to 16.5:1). We also found a protan carrier with an even more extreme L:M ratio (0.37:1). All subjects had nearly identical S-cone densities, indicating independence of the developmental mechanism that governs the relative numerosity of L/M and S cones. L:M cone ratio estimates were correlated highly with those obtained in the same eyes using the flicker photometric electroretinogram (ERG), although the comparison indicates that the signal from each M cone makes a larger contribution to the ERG than each L cone. Although all subjects had highly disordered arrangements of L and M cones, three subjects showed evidence for departures from a strictly random rule for assigning the L and M cone photopigments. In two retinas, these departures corresponded to local clumping of cones of like type. In a third retina, the L:M cone ratio differed significantly at two retinal locations on opposite sides of the fovea. These results suggest that the assignment of L and M pigment, although highly irregular, is not a completely random process. Surprisingly, in the protan carrier, in which X-chromosome inactivation would favor L- or M-cone clumping, there was no evidence of clumping, perhaps as a result of cone migration during foveal development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2414-05.2005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. 10.1364/JOSAA.8.000404 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/cne.902550103 · DOI
  3. 10.1167/2.8.2 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00302-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF00291502 · DOI
  6. Bowmaker JK, Parry JWL, Mollon JD (2003) The arrangement of L and M cones in human and a primate retina. In: Normal and defective colour vision (Mollon JD, Pokorny J, Knoblauch K, eds), pp 39-50. New York: Oxford UP. · DOI
  7. 1999, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 40, 2840
  8. 10.1364/JOSAA.17.000607 · DOI
  9. 1832, Lond and Edinburgh Philos Mag and J Sci, 1, 169
  10. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990125)403:4<502::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  11. 10.1364/JOSAA.17.000499 · DOI
  12. 10.1167/2.8.1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1073/pnas.0401440101 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 1975, J Physiol (Lond), 248, 649, 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010994 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90178-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90129-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0952523800009639 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/cne.903120411 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S1350-9462(98)00013-5 · DOI
  20. 1983, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 220, 115, 10.1098/rspb.1983.0091 · DOI
  21. 10.1364/JOSAA.17.000538 · DOI
  22. 1985, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 26, 289
  23. 1946, Nature, 157, 736
  24. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01261-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/S0952523800005605 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.86.3.983 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1364/JOSA.71.000705 · DOI
  28. 10.1364/JOSA.67.000202 · DOI
  29. 1968, J Physiol (Lond), 196, 415, 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008515 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00043-3 · DOI
  31. Hagstrom SA, Neitz J, Neitz M (1997) Ratio of M/L pigment gene expression decreases with retinal eccentricity. In: Colour vision deficiencies XIII (Cavonius CR, ed), pp 59-66. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. · DOI
  32. 10.1097/00001756-199806220-00009 · DOI
  33. 1954, Nature, 158, 97
  34. 1984, Ophthalmology, 91, 603, 10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34247-6 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90058-8 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90060-9 · DOI
  37. 10.1364/OE.8.000631 · DOI
  38. 10.1167/5.5.5 · DOI
  39. 1884, Médicales, 1, 80
  40. 10.1038/nn1274 · DOI
  41. 10.1364/JOSAA.17.000635 · DOI
  42. Jacobs GH, Neitz J (1993) Electrophysiological estimates of individual variation in the L/M cone ratio. In: Colour vision deficiencies XI (Drum B, ed). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. · DOI
  43. 10.1364/JOSAA.13.000641 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90143-K · DOI · Paper page
  45. Jordan G, Mollon JD (1997) Unique hues in heterozygotes for protan and deutan deficiencies. In: Colour vision deficiencies XIII (Cavonius CR, ed), pp 67-76. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00366-0 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/1520-6378(2001)26:1+<::AID-COL28>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  48. 1964, J Opt Soc Am, 54, 1171, 10.1364/JOSA.54.001171 · DOI
  49. Krauskopf J (1978) On identifying detectors. In: Visual psychophysics and physiology (Armington JC, Krauskopf J, Wooten BR, eds), pp 283-298. New York: Academic. · DOI
  50. 10.1364/JOSAA.17.000517 · DOI
  51. 2003, J Vis, 3, 146
  52. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00573.x · DOI
  53. 1997, J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis, 14, 2882
  54. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)88334-4 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/360677a0 · DOI
  56. 1984, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 222, 373, 10.1098/rspb.1984.0071 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90079-K · DOI
  58. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80845-4 · DOI
  59. 10.1126/science.2937147 · DOI
  60. 10.1364/JOSAA.1.001175 · DOI
  61. 10.1126/science.7863325 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/1520-6378(2001)26:1+<::AID-COL51>3.3.CO;2-C · DOI
  63. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00818-8 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90035-4 · DOI
  65. 10.1364/JOSAA.17.000615 · DOI
  66. 1996, J Neurosci, 16, 2251, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-07-02251.1996 · DOI
  67. 10.1167/iovs.03-0094 · DOI
  68. 10.1364/AO.26.001437 · DOI
  69. Pokorny J, Smith VC, Wesner MF (1991) Variability in cone populations and implications. In: From pigments to perception: advances in understanding visual processes (Valberg A, Lee BB, eds), pp 23-34. New York: Plenum. · DOI
  70. 10.1017/S0952523800000687 · DOI
  71. 2005, J Vis, 5, 632
  72. 10.1093/hmg/6.8.1323 · DOI
  73. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00712.x · DOI
  74. 2005, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 46, 3546
  75. 10.1038/17383 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00043-8 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/0042-6989(64)90034-3 · DOI
  78. 10.1364/JOSAA.10.002118 · DOI
  79. 10.1073/pnas.1934712100 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1017/S095252380522206X · DOI
  81. 10.1364/JOSAA.1.000443 · DOI
  82. 1998, Lasers Light Ophthalmol, 8, 129
  83. 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90185-X · DOI
  84. Williams DR (1990) The invisible cone mosaic. In: Advances in photoreception: proceedings of a symposium on frontiers of visual science, pp 135-148. Washington, DC: National Academy.
  85. 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90242-X · DOI
  86. Williams DR, Sekiguchi N, Haake W, Brainard DH, Packer O (1991) The cost of trichromacy for spatial vision. In: From pigments to perception: advances in understanding visual processes (Lee BB, Valberg A, eds), pp 11-22. New York: Plenum. · DOI
  87. 10.1093/hmg/6.7.981 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90143-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Hofer, H., Carroll, J., Neitz, J., Neitz, M., & Williams, D. R.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-10-19
Volume
25
Issue
42
Pages
9669-9679
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
364
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review