The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representation of Accumulating Evidence for a Decision in Two Parietal Areas
Open accessAbstract
Decisions are often made by accumulating evidence for and against the alternatives. The momentary evidence represented by sensory neurons is accumulated by downstream structures to form a decision variable, linking the evolving decision to the formation of a motor plan. When decisions are communicated by eye movements, neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) represent the accumulation of evidence bearing on the potential targets for saccades. We now show that reach-related neurons from the medial intraparietal area (MIP) exhibit a gradual modulation of their firing rates consistent with the representation of an evolving decision variable. When decisions were communicated by saccades instead of reaches, decision-related activity was attenuated in MIP, whereas LIP neurons were active while monkeys communicated decisions by saccades or reaches. Thus, for decisions communicated by a hand movement, a parallel flow of sensory information is directed to parietal areas MIP and LIP during decision formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A DV in standard drift-diffusion model (DDM) (3–5, 7) (Fig. 4A) accumulates sensory evidence (drift), accompanied by stochastic internal or sensory noise (diffusion) that, when reaches either upper (correct trials) or lower (error trials) bound, produces a decision at RT.”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“An important diagnostic signature of perceptual decision-making is the gradual accumulation of noise (5, 51) expected for most accumulation-to-bound decision models.”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“indicating accumulation of stochastic trial-by-trial diffusion noise (5, 51).”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We show that this variable is consistent with models of gradual accumulation of noisy sensory evidence to a decision bound.”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Here, close to the top of the cortical hierarchy, internal decision variables (DV) are accumulated in a form of ramping neural activity (3–6) that is transformed into a decision when a decision boundary is reached (7).”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In what follows we argue the neural activity ramp during epoch 4 is consistent with a bounded integration mechanism of decision-making (3–5, 7).”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“When VarCE is calculated from residuals (5, 51) (Materials and Methods), it is similar (Fig. 4G, black) showing linear increase between decision onset (Fig. 4G, up arrow) and decision termination (Fig. 4G, down arrow) times.”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Overall, VarCE exhibits a linear increase during epoch 4, a characteristic signature of diffusion process consistent with an accumulation-to-bound model (5, 51).”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The calculated (Materials and Methods) CorCE matrix (Fig. 4J) indeed exhibits characteristic increase of correlation as a function of time and, for given time (e.g., along the top row), shows sequential decay as often observed (5, 51) during decision-making.”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856 · cited 1×
“The reported latencies are the times at which the ROC index significantly departed from 0.5 for at least 50 ms ( p 0.05; Hanley and McNeil, 1982).”
BackgroundInfluentialBrainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 20,012 · cited 2×
“Experimental control and stimulus presentation were achieved with either REX (Hays et al., 1982) in combination with the Psychophysics toolbox (Brainard, 1997) or with EXPO (developed by Peter Lennie, currently maintained by Rod Dotson, Center for Neural Science at New York University, New York,…”
MethodParallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & AU (1986) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · Cited by 15,686 · cited 1×
“This is not the type of parallel processing that is often associated with neural networks (Rumelhart and McClelland, 1986) or computer systems but is instead a direct representation (Barlow, 1995) of a decision variable in the firing rates of neurons.”
BackgroundDistributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513 · cited 4×
“Such an accumulation of noisy evidence has been likened to a random walk or diffusion process (Ratcliff, 1978; Gold and Shadlen, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764 · cited 6×
“…occurs in circuits associated with provisional behavioral responses to stim- uli (Schall, 2001; Romo et al., 2004; Rorie and Newsome, 2005; Gold and Shadlen, 2007; Lemus et al., 2007; Andersen and Cui, 2009; Cisek and Kalaska, 2010; Hernández et al., 2010; Westendorff et al., 2010),…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPreface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman, P. S., & RAKIC, P. T. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,537
Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion
Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000284 · Cited by 3,442 · cited 10×
“We estimated the rate of this rise or decline by fitting lines to the response averages in the 150 ms epoch from the earliest point that these trends appear to emerge (see Materials and Methods).”
BackgroundInfluentialMountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 1×
“…saccadic eye movements (Thier and Andersen, 1998), MIP neurons signal the spatial location of objects that are potential targets of reach movements (Mountcastle et al., 1975; Johnson et al., 1996; Snyder et al., 1997; Batista et al., 1999; Eskandar and Assad, 1999), as well as the outcome of…”
BackgroundThe analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance
Britten, K., Shadlen, M., Newsome, W., & Movshon, J. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-12-04745.1992 · Cited by 1,958 · cited 1×
“We recorded from single neurons in areas LIP and MIP of two rhesus monkeys that were trained to judge the direction of motion of a dynamic random-dot display (Britten et al., 1992).”
MethodSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Barlow H (1995) The cognitive neurosciences, The neuron doctrine in perception (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA), pp 415–435.
- 10.1038/35006062 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00971-6 · DOI
- Hays, 1982, A UNIX-based multiple process system for real-time data acquisition and control, WESCON Conf Proc, 2, 1
- 10.1002/1096-9861(20001204)428:1<79::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-295X.85.2.59 · DOI · Paper page
- Shadlen MN Kiani R Hanks T Churchland AK (2008) in Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions, An intentional framework, eds Engel C Singer W (MIT, Cambridge), p 71. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–135 of 135
Fettiplace, M. R., Vincent, K. F., Cho, A., Dillon, E. J., Stapley, B. M., Stewart, V., & Solt, K. (2024) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.026 · Cited by 5
“This task permits evaluation of delay-dependent (i.e. hippocampal) 17,21 and delay-independent (i.e. non-hippocampal) 22,23 memory processes under continuous low-dose isoflurane while simultaneously quantifying markers of arousal.”
MethodRelating a Spiking Neural Network Model and the Diffusion Model of Decision-Making
Umakantha, A., Purcell, B. A., & Palmeri, T. J. (2022) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-022-00143-4 · Cited by 5
“In addition, neither the spiking neural network nor the diffusion model specify the nature of the motor response, so the models can in principle apply equally to the initiation of saccadic eye movements, limb movements, or finger keypresses (Cisek et al., 2009; de Lafuente et al., 2015).”
BackgroundUnihemispheric evidence accumulation in pigeons.
Wittek, N., Matsui, H., Behroozi, M., Otto, T., Wittek, K., Sarı, N., Stoecker, S., Letzner, S., Choudhary, V., Peterburs, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xan0000290 · Cited by 5
Variable Statistical Structure of Neuronal Spike Trains in Monkey Superior Colliculus
Cho, S.-H., Crapse, T. B., Grimaldi, P., Lau, H. C., & Basso, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1491-20.2021 · Cited by 6
“…Copyright © 2021 the authors the superior colliculus (SC) (Shadlen and Newsome, 1996, 2001; Kim and Shadlen, 1999; Horwitz and Newsome, 2001; Roitman and Shadlen, 2002; Ding and Gold, 2010, 2012; de Lafuente et al., 2015; Ding, 2015; Brody and Hanks, 2016; Yartsev et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntegrating somatosensory information over time
Hernández-Pérez, R., Rojas-Hortelano, E., & de Lafuente, V. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/817262 · Cited by 5
The effect of reward expectation on the time course of perceptual decisions
Tosoni, A., Committeri, G., Calluso, C., & Galati, G. (2017) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13555 · Cited by 5
“While the LIP region accumulated evidence during both eye- and hand-movement trials, such modulations were specific for hand-movement trials in the MIP region (de Lafuente et al., 2015).”
BackgroundA corticostriatal learning mechanism linking excess striatal dopamine and auditory hallucinationsPreprint
Lakshminarasimhan, K. J., Buck, J., Kellendonk, C., & Horga, G. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.03.18.643990 · Cited by 3
“Neural signatures of evidence accumulation for perceptual and value computations have been found in associative and frontal cortical regions respectively (de Lafuente et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2020).”
Kawabata, M., Soma, S., Saiki-Ishikawa, A., Nonomura, S., Yoshida, J., Ríos, A., Sakai, Y., & Isomura, Y. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00200.2020 · Cited by 8
Visual perceptual learning generalizes to untrained effectors
Awada, A., Bakhtiari, S., & Pack, C. C. (2021) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.21.3.10 · Cited by 4
“There is ample evidence that PPC neurons in non-human primates can respond to both saccades and arm movements, even in specialized areas such as the LIP and the parietal reach region (PRR) (de Lafuente, Jazayeri, & Shadlen, 2015; Snyder, Batista, & Andersen, 1997).”
Epistemic reduction of the concept of ‘decision’
Burnston, D. C. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-04917-8 · Cited by 12
“More recent analyses (De Lafuente et al., 2015) have looked at the population-level behaviors of LIP, specifically how they might vary depending on the kind of response that the monkey has to make.”
Context-specific and context-invariant computations of interval timing
Pourmohammadi, A., & Sanayei, M. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1249502 · Cited by 3
Entrainment and maintenance of an internal metronome in premotor cortexPreprint
Cadena-Valencia, J., García‐Garibay, O., Merchant, H., Jazayeri, M., & de Lafuente, V. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/394783
“To exploit these regularities, the brain must be able to measure time intervals between repetitive events (Buhusi and Meck 2005; de Lafuente, Jazayeri, and Shadlen 2015; Confais et al. 2012; Leon and Shadlen 2003), and use this timing information to anticipate future events (Goel and Buonomano…”
BackgroundSelf-citationTagliabue, C., Veniero, D., Benwell, C., Cecere, R., Savazzi, S., & Thut, G. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/373464 · Cited by 3
Visser, Y. F., Medendorp, W. P., & Selen, L. P. J. (2025) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.70237 · Cited by 2
“…do not reflect a serial neural chain but arise from overlapping and intertwined neural processes (Cisek & Kalaska, 2005; Contemori et al., 2023; de Lafuente et al., 2015; Donner et al., 2009; Gold & Shadlen, 2003; Rogge et al., 2022; Roitman & Shadlen, 2002; Selen et al., 2012, 2023; Visser et…”
Integrated Perceptual Decisions Rely on Parallel Evidence AccumulationPreprint
Rangelov, D., Fellrath, J., & Mattingley, J. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4156143 · Cited by 2
“…2015; Zhou et al., 2021), economists (de Hollander et al., 2020; Heng et al., 2020; Khaw et al., 2021; Prat-Carrabin & Woodford, 2022; Woodford, 2020) and neuroscientists (Donner et al., 2009; Kristan, 2008; Lafuente et al., 2015; O’Connell et al., 2018; Shadlen & Kiani, 2013) over several decades.”
Allocation of Visuospatial Attention Indexes Evidence Accumulation for Reach Decisions
Schonard, C., Heed, T., & Seegelke, C. (2022) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0313-22.2022 · Cited by 4
Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex
Armstrong, A. G., & Vlasov, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2514107123 · Cited by 1
“An important diagnostic signature of perceptual decision-making is the gradual accumulation of noise (5, 51) expected for most accumulation-to-bound decision models.”
InfluentialSequential Sampling from Memory Underlies Perceptual Decisions Unyoked from Actions
Sharma, P. M., Shadlen, M. N., & Shushruth, S. (2026) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675475
“A salient result from this line of research is that the accumulation of sensory evidence for decisions is instantiated by neurons associated with motor planning (de Lafuente et al., 2015; Ding & Gold, 2010, 2012; Roitman & Shadlen, 2002).”
Self-citationNeural Correlates of Perceptual Decision Making in Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Armstrong, A. G., & Vlasov, Y. D. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.03.29.646003 · Cited by 1
Sensorimotor decisions rely on the entanglement of evidence and motor accumulation processesPreprint
Verdonck, S., Loossens, T., & Philiastides, M. G. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.16.492075 · Cited by 1
“The study of sensorimotor decision-making is currently enjoying an ever-increasing amount of attention across different species and levels of neuronal organization (Heekeren et al., 2008; de Lafuente et al., 2015; Hanks et al., 2015; Licata et al., 2017; O’Connell et al., 2018).”
BackgroundDiscrimination of regular and irregular rhythms by accumulation of time differences
Espinoza-Monroy, M., & de Lafuente, V. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.07.04.187708 · Cited by 1
“…explains decision-making under varied sensory contexts such as the perception of visual motion, and the discrimination of auditory and tactile stimuli (Brunton et al., 2013; Churchland et al., 2008; de Lafuente et al., 2015; Hernández-Pérez et al., 2020; Pinto et al., 2018; Ratcliff et al., 2016).”
BackgroundHow the Senses Guide Goal-Directed and Defensive Actions: Common Principles of Organization
Caminiti, R., Iannetti, G. D., & Battaglia‐Mayer, A. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.23893-5 · Cited by 1
“Neurons in these areas, such as in VIP, combine and align somatosensory and visual motion signals, allowing the visual analysis of approaching objects (Colby et al., 1993; Duhamel et al., 1998) potentially colliding with different body parts, face and head in particular.”
BackgroundPrimate Gaze Behavior Reflects Change of Mind in a Naturalistic Navigation TaskPreprint
Choi, W., Alefantis, P., Andreadakis, G., & Angelaki, D. E. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.10.756925
“To investigate flexible decision-making, a large body of studies examined the neural and behavioral basis of sensory based decisions 1–7 .”
Minimal mean-field gated parietal circuit model for flexible perceptual decisionsPreprint
Lenfesty, B., Azimi, A., Bhattacharyya, S., Shushruth, S., & Wong‐Lin, K. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.09.675139
“…using different effector modality such as arm reaching or finger pressing instead of saccadic eye movement in Shushruth et al. (2022) (Figure 5A, top); previous work (e.g. Lafuente et al., 2015) has shown than LIP neurons robustly encode decision variable regardless of reaches or saccades.”
Semantic Interaction Information mediates compositional generalization in latent space
Schwarcz, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.27134
“Similarly, models of animal behavior and perception describe sequential inference akin to navigation towards a ”decision boundary” [91, 31, 48, 56, 12, 22, 45, 71, 84, 85].”
An alternative to encoding for thinking about neural representation
Burnston, D. C., & Ryan, T. J. (2026) · Philosophy and the Mind Sciences · doi:10.33735/phimisci.2026.12158 · Cited by 1
“For instance, decision-variables are differentially implemented in the parietal cortex depending on whether a saccade or a reach task is the required response (De Lafuente et al., 2015).”
Post, S., Mol, W., Rahmatullah, N., & Goel, A. (2025) · Timing & Time Perception · doi:10.1163/22134468-bja10122
Sharifi, K., Abbaszadeh, M., & Ghazizadeh, A. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.04.08.588532
“One possibility is that evidence accumulation could be done by areas receiving the vlPFC inputs, such as in SC 31 or LIP 32,33 .”
BackgroundClapp, M., Bahuguna, J., Giossi, C., Rubin, J. E., Verstynen, T. D., & Vich, C. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.09.05.556301
Inferring functional organization of posterior parietal cortex circuitry based on information flow
Kang, J.-U., Mooshagian, E., & Snyder, L. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.03.08.531516
Is There a General Role for the Monkey Oculomotor System in Perceptual Decision-Making?
Li, Y., & Krishnamurthy, K. V. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1818-15.2015 · Cited by 1
“In contrast, MIP passed this test only for the reach task (de Lafuente et al., 2015, their Fig.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCognitive and Action-Based Aspects of Developing Decisions in Parietal Cortex
Kubanek, J., & Mooshagian, E. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1181-15.2015 · Cited by 1
“…tendency (Snyder et al., 1997; Calton et al., 2002; Cui and Andersen, 2007). de Lafuente et al. (2015) found that the discharge rate of neurons in both LIP and MIP was correlated with the amount of evidence accumulated over time to sup- port a particular choice (de Lafuente et al., 2015, their Fig.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCondorelli, R. (2022) · Sociology Mind · doi:10.4236/sm.2022.122003
“…et al., 2008; Banks & Isham, 2009; Haynes, 2011; Bode et al., 2011; Fried et al., 2011; Moore, 2011; Harris, 2012; Soon et al., 2013; Nahmias et al. 2014; Salvaris & Haggard, 2014; de Lafuente et al., 2015; Perez et al., 2015; Hallett, 2007, 2016; Wisniewski et al., 2016; Frith & Haggard, 2018).”
Metadata
- Authors
- de Lafuente, V., Jazayeri, M., & Shadlen, M. N.
- Affiliations
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2015-03-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4306-4318
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC4355201
- OpenAlex
- W2090544951
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- decision-making, evidence accumulation, lateral intraparietal area, saccades, reach-to-grasp, decision variables, parietal cortex, eye movements, motor planning, parallel computing, firing rate modulation
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Decision Making, Discrimination, Psychological, Eye Movements, Judgment, Functional Laterality, Macaca mulatta, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Psychophysics, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review