Cited by 162Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Representation of Accumulating Evidence for a Decision in Two Parietal Areas

Open access
de Lafuente, Victor, Jazayeri, Mehrdad, Shadlen, Michael N.·2015·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Decisions are often made by accumulating evidence for and against the alternatives. The momentary evidence represented by sensory neurons is accumulated by downstream structures to form a decision variable, linking the evolving decision to the formation of a motor plan. When decisions are communicated by eye movements, neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) represent the accumulation of evidence bearing on the potential targets for saccades. We now show that reach-related neurons from the medial intraparietal area (MIP) exhibit a gradual modulation of their firing rates consistent with the representation of an evolving decision variable. When decisions were communicated by saccades instead of reaches, decision-related activity was attenuated in MIP, whereas LIP neurons were active while monkeys communicated decisions by saccades or reaches. Thus, for decisions communicated by a hand movement, a parallel flow of sensory information is directed to parietal areas MIP and LIP during decision formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2451-14.2015

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Barlow H (1995) The cognitive neurosciences, The neuron doctrine in perception (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA), pp 415–435.
  2. 10.1038/35006062 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00971-6 · DOI
  4. Hays, 1982, A UNIX-based multiple process system for real-time data acquisition and control, WESCON Conf Proc, 2, 1
  5. 10.1002/1096-9861(20001204)428:1<79::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  6. 10.1037//0033-295X.85.2.59 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Shadlen MN Kiani R Hanks T Churchland AK (2008) in Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions, An intentional framework, eds Engel C Singer W (MIT, Cambridge), p 71. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–135 of 135

Metadata

Authors
de Lafuente, V., Jazayeri, M., & Shadlen, M. N.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2015-03-11
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
4306-4318
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2090544951
Cited by
162
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 7
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
decision-making, evidence accumulation, lateral intraparietal area, saccades, reach-to-grasp, decision variables, parietal cortex, eye movements, motor planning, parallel computing, firing rate modulation
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Decision Making, Discrimination, Psychological, Eye Movements, Judgment, Functional Laterality, Macaca mulatta, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Psychophysics, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review