Cited by 213Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Human and Monkey Ventral Prefrontal Fibers Use the Same Organizational Principles to Reach Their Targets: Tracing versus Tractography

Open access
Jbabdi, Saad, Lehman, Julia F., Haber, Suzanne N., Behrens, Timothy E.·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

This article is a comparative study of white matter projections from ventral prefrontal cortex (vPFC) between human and macaque brains. We test whether the organizational rules that vPFC connections follow in macaques are preserved in humans. These rules concern the trajectories of some of the white matter projections from vPFC and how the position of regions in the vPFC dictate the trajectories of their projections in the white matter. To address this question, we present a novel approach that combines direct tracer measurements of entire white matter trajectories in macaque monkeys with diffusion MRI tractography of both macaques and humans. The approach allows us to provide explicit validation of diffusion tractography and transfer tractography strategies across species to test the extent to which inferences from macaques can be applied to human neuroanatomy. Apart from one exception, we found a remarkable overlap between the two techniques in the macaque. Furthermore, the organizational principles followed by vPFC tracts in macaques are preserved in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2457-12.2013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anatomical accuracy of diffusion-weighted tractography continues to be a matter of controversy, and reconstructing connectomes with both high sensitivity and high specificity remains challenging.

    “However, the anatomical accuracy of diffusion-weighted tractography, which infers neuronal pathways from tissue water diffusion direction, continues to be a matter of controversy, and reconstructing connectomes with both high sensitivity and high specificity remains challenging (Sporns et al. 2005; Bastiani et al. 2012; Jbabdi et al. 2013, 2015; Thomas et al. 2014; Azadbakht et al. 2015; Calabrese”

    From Diffusion MRI-based cortical connectome reconstruction: dependency on tractography procedures and neuroanatomical characteristics (2018) · cites this paper as Jbabdi et al. 2013

    The Discussion (Multimodal comparative anatomy; page unavailable) identifies a tractography failure and explains that small fascicles embedded in grey matter are difficult to track. This supports concern about anatomical accuracy, but the paper does not establish the broader claim that reconstructing connectomes with both high sensitivity and high specificity remains challenging. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 213

Authors
Jbabdi, S., Lehman, J. F., Haber, S. N., & Behrens, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-02-13
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
3190-3201
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1975148201
Cited by
213
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (1U54MH091657, WT088312AIA, 098369)
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50mh086400-05, 5u54mh091657-05, 1u54mh091657-01, MH086400, 1U54‐MH‐091657)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH073111, P-50-MH-086400, 1U54-MH091657-01, MH086400, MH73111, U54-MH091657)
  • NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (1U54-MH-091657)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
ventral prefrontal cortex, diffusion MRI tractography, macaque, human-brain comparison, white matter organization, prefrontal connectivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Brain Stem, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, Male, Nerve Fibers, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Species Specificity, Thalamus, Reproducibility of Results, Prefrontal Cortex, Internal Capsule, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review