Diffusion MRI-based cortical connectome reconstruction: dependency on tractography procedures and neuroanatomical characteristics
Open accessAbstract
Diffusion MRI (dMRI)-based tractography offers unique abilities to map whole-brain structural connections in human and animal brains. However, dMRI-based tractography indirectly measures white matter tracts, with suboptimal accuracy and reliability. Recently, sophisticated methods including constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) and global tractography have been developed to improve tract reconstructions through modeling of more complex fiber orientations. Our study aimed to determine the accuracy of connectome reconstruction for three dMRI-based tractography approaches: diffusion tensor (DT)-based, CSD-based and global tractography. Therefore, we validated whole brain structural connectome reconstructions based on ten ultrahigh-resolution dMRI rat brain scans and 106 cortical regions, from which varying tractography parameters were compared against standardized neuronal tracer data. All tested tractography methods generated considerable numbers of false positive and false negative connections. There was a parameter range trade-off between sensitivity: 0.06-0.63 interhemispherically and 0.22-0.86 intrahemispherically; and specificity: 0.99-0.60 interhemispherically and 0.99-0.23 intrahemispherically. Furthermore, performance of all tractography methods decreased with increasing spatial distance between connected regions. Similar patterns and trade-offs were found, when we applied spherical deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms, streamline thresholding and group-based average network thresholding. Despite the potential of CSD-based and global tractography to handle complex fiber orientations at voxel level, reconstruction accuracy, especially for long-distance connections, remains a challenge. Hence, connectome reconstruction benefits from varying parameter settings and combination of tractography methods to account for anatomical variation of neuronal pathways.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study validated whole-brain diffusion MRI tractography connectomes in rat brain against neuronal tracer data and found that DT-based, CSD-based, and global tractography all produce substantial false positive and false negative connections. Reconstruction accuracy depends strongly on tractography method, parameter settings, hemisphere, and connection distance.
Key findings
- Across all tested tractography methods and parameters, sensitivity ranged from 0.06–0.63 for interhemispheric and 0.22–0.86 for intrahemispheric connections, while specificity ranged from 0.99–0.60 interhemispherically and 0.99–0.23 intrahemispherically.
- CSD-based tractography gave the highest sensitivity but lowest specificity; global tractography gave the lowest sensitivity but highest specificity; DT-based tractography generally had lower Jaccard index than CSD-based or global tractography.
- Performance declined with increasing spatial distance between connected regions: sensitivity and Jaccard index decreased non-linearly, and specificity increased non-linearly, especially for long-distance connections; global tractography had particularly low sensitivity (<0.10) and Jaccard index (<0.05) for long-distance fibers.
- SIFT, streamline thresholding, and group-based average network thresholding did not remove the sensitivity–specificity trade-off; SIFT decreased sensitivity, increased specificity, and decreased Jaccard index for both DT- and CSD-based tractography.
Methods
- Ten healthy adult male Wistar rat brains were scanned postmortem with ultrahigh-resolution HARDI at 9.4 T (60 diffusion directions, b = 3842 s/mm², voxel resolution 150 × 148 × 150 µm³), and 106 bilateral cortical regions from the Paxinos and Watson atlas were used as connectome nodes.
- DT-based, CSD-based, and global tractography were performed in MRtrix3 with varied parameters, including step size, FA/FOD threshold, angular threshold, streamline number, particle potential, and connection potential; SIFT, streamline thresholds, and group incidence thresholds were also tested.
- Tractography-based connectivity was compared against a rat neuronal tracer database containing more than 450,237 ipsilateral and 175,654 contralateral connections from more than 6,183 publications, with tracer-based network density of 0.27; performance was measured by sensitivity, specificity, and Jaccard index, including by inter- vs. intrahemispheric connections and Euclidean distance categories.
Limitations
- The paper states that mismatch with tracers may partly reflect incompleteness of neuroanatomical tracer data, that multi-synaptic connections not easily detected by tracing might be misclassified as false positives, and that this challenges neuronal tracing as a gold standard.
- The paper states that subcortical regions were not assessed, biasing conclusions toward cortical connectomics; connectivity was defined only by streamline endpoints, ignoring three-dimensional pathway structure; and connection weights were not considered.
- Evident from the text: validation was limited to postmortem rat brain and 106 cortical regions, so findings may not directly generalize to in vivo human connectomes or subcortical networks.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
22 of 41 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
At standard spatial resolutions around a few mm, multiple fiber orientations affect the diffusivity patterns in up to 90% of white matter voxels in the human brain.
“At standard spatial resolutions around a few mm, multiple fiber orientations affect the diffusivity patterns in up to 90% of white matter voxels in the human brain (Jeurissen et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jeurissen et al. 2013 source
- Premisecitation
DT-based deterministic tractography is particularly hampered by voxels containing multiple fiber orientations such as crossing, bending or fanning fibers.
“This method is particularly hampered by voxels containing multiple fiber orientations such as crossing, bending or fanning fibers (Jbabdi and Johansen-Berg 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jbabdi and Johansen-Berg 2011 source
- Premisecitation
False positive tract reconstructions may lead to biased characterization of connectome topology.
“This may lead to biased characterization of connectome topology, particularly in the presence of false positive tract reconstructions (Drakesmith et al. 2015; Zalesky et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The overall results confirm previously reported trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity of tract reconstructions across tractography methods.
“As such, our overall results confirm previously reported trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity of tract reconstructions across tractography methods (Bastiani et al. 2012; Thomas et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2015; Donahue et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Bastiani et al. 2012 source
- cites Thomas et al. 2014 source
- cites Chen et al. 2015 source
The Results (§3.1) explicitly report a sensitivity–specificity trade-off when tuning fiber-number thresholds and DTI tractography parameters, and say it agrees with previous findings. Chen et al. do not establish that trade-off across different tractography methods; their analysis concerns parameter choices within DTI tractography. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
The FA threshold had significantly more effect on connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity than the step size and angle threshold.
“The FA threshold had significantly more effect on connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity than the step size and angle threshold, in line with previous research (Azadbakht et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Azadbakht et al. 2015 source
The Results sections on FA termination and streamline curvature report that higher FA thresholds reduced connection accuracy, while curvature constraints had no clear effect. However, the paper does not report a statistical comparison showing a significantly greater effect on sensitivity and specificity, and the Discussion refers to a default step size rather than a tested step-size comparison. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Chen et al. 2015 source
Results §3.1 says the FA threshold had more impact on the reconstructed connectome than the angular threshold, and describes a sensitivity–specificity tradeoff when parameters were varied. Methods §2.2 evaluates FA and angular thresholds, but not step size; the cited passages also do not establish that the difference was statistically significant. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The considerable amount of false positive and false negative connections generated by diffusion-based tractography in rat brain is in line with related studies in macaque brain, mouse brain, and human connectome.
“The considerable amount of false positive and false negative connections generated by diffusion-based tractography in rat brain is in line with related studies in macaque brain (Thomas et al. 2014; Azadbakht et al. 2015; Donahue et al. 2016), and mouse brain (Calabrese et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2015), and similar findings have been reported for the human connectome (Maier-Hein et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation
An increasing FA threshold negatively influenced sensitivity and the Jaccard index.
“In fact, an increasing FA threshold negatively influenced sensitivity and the Jaccard index, suggesting that an FA threshold should be omitted for this type of datasets and analyses (Azadbakht et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Azadbakht et al. 2015 source
The Results section on FA termination constraints reports that higher FA thresholds reduced tracking accuracy and suggests omitting them under the study’s experimental conditions. It does not report that sensitivity or the Jaccard index decreased; those specific measures are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Chen et al. 2015 source
Results §3.1 reports that smaller FA thresholds gave higher AUCs and that more restrictive tractography thresholds missed more connections, consistent with reduced sensitivity. The paper does not report a Jaccard index. Its Discussion §4 identifies an FA threshold of 0.1 as best for its mouse-brain data, rather than recommending that the threshold be omitted. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
There was a relatively high rate of false negative reconstructions for connected cortical areas located at large distance from each other, especially for global tractography.
“In agreement with previous studies (Zalesky and Fornito 2009; Jbabdi et al. 2015), we found a relatively high rate of false negative reconstructions for connected cortical areas located at large distance from each other, especially for global tractography, which may consequently lead to omissions in identification of important inter-modular hub-node connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Zalesky and Fornito 2009 source
- cites Jbabdi et al. 2015 source
Sections 2 and 3.3 say distant cortical connections tend to be weaker and that sparse long-distance pathways are likely to be difficult to identify with tractography. Section 3.1 also acknowledges false-negative connections, but it does not report a relatively high false-negative rate for distant cortical areas or say the problem is especially pronounced with global tractography. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
There was a pattern of increasing sensitivity and decreasing specificity at increasing angle thresholds for the lowest FA threshold.
“There was a pattern of increasing sensitivity and decreasing specificity at increasing angle thresholds for the lowest FA threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
The appearance of reconstructed fibers in different layers of the hippocampal area differs between the three algorithms.
“Also, the appearance of reconstructed fibers in different layers of the hippocampal area differs between the three algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The angle threshold and step size had minimal influence on reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.
“The angle threshold and step size had minimal influence on reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
All tested tractography methods generated considerable numbers of false positive and false negative connections.
“All tested tractography methods generated considerable numbers of false positive and false negative connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
The FA threshold affected tract reconstruction sensitivity as well as specificity.
“The FA threshold affected tract reconstruction sensitivity as well as specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
The tracer-based connectome had a network density of 0.27.
“As such, the tracer-based connectome had a network density (i.e., the proportion of true connections out of all potential connections) of 0.27 (Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
Performance of all tractography methods decreased with increasing spatial distance between connected regions.
“Furthermore, performance of all tractography methods decreased with increasing spatial distance between connected regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Euclidean distance between region centers of gravity is a valid proxy for fiber length.
- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingreasoning
At the same time, the Jaccard index increased with increasing number of streamlines from 0.22 to 0.28.
“At the same time, the Jaccard index increased with increasing number of streamlines from 0.22 to 0.28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
For DT-based tractography, over this range, the network density varied from 0.07 to 0.39.
“Over this range, the network density varied from 0.07 to 0.39.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
Subtle differences in fiber patterns between the three algorithms were apparent.
“However, subtle differences in fiber patterns between the three algorithms were apparent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For interhemispheric connections, global tractography sensitivity ranged from 0.06 ± 0.01 to 0.29 ± 0.03.
“For interhemispheric connections, sensitivity ranged from 0.06 ± 0.01 to 0.29 ± 0.03, and specificity from 0.87 ± 0.02 to 0.99 ± 0.01.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
Overall performance (Jaccard index) of CSD-based and global tractography was comparable to conventional DT-based tractography.
“Despite their ability to solve reconstruction issues with crossing fibers, overall performance (i.e., as expressed by the Jaccard index) of CSD-based and global tractography was comparable to conventional DT-based tractography.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For CSD-SIFT-based tractograms at an angle threshold of 40°, interhemispheric sensitivity ranged from 0.26 to 0.34.
“For CSD-based tractography, at an angle threshold of 40°, the interhemispheric sensitivity ranged from 0.42 to 0.54 and the specificity from 0.68 to 0.78, whereas for CSD-SIFT-based tractograms, sensitivity ranged from 0.26 to 0.34 and specificity from 0.83 to 0.90.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For both DT- and CSD-based tractography, sensitivity decreased after SIFT.
“For both DT- and CSD-based tractography, sensitivity decreased, whereas specificity increased after SIFT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For DT-based tractography, the Jaccard index decreased with increasing streamline thresholds for intrahemispheric connections from 0.31 to 0.17.
“For DT-based tractography, the Jaccard index decreased with increasing streamline thresholds, for both interhemispheric (i.e., from 0.14 to 0.05) and intrahemispheric (i.e., from 0.31 to 0.17) connections (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For all tractography algorithms, with increasing streamline threshold, specificity increased.
“For all tractography algorithms, we found that with increasing streamline threshold, connectome reconstruction sensitivity decreased, whereas specificity increased (Figures S10 and S11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
Contrary to the FA threshold, the FOD threshold appeared to have no impact on connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.
“Interestingly, contrary to the FA threshold (for DT-based tractography), the FOD threshold (for CSD-based tractography) appeared to have no impact on connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Jaccard index for intrahemispheric connections was consistently higher than for interhemispheric connections.
“The Jaccard index for intrahemispheric connections was consistently higher as compared to its value for interhemispheric connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Global tractography had relatively low Jaccard index (< 0.05) for tracking long-distance fibers.
“Noteworthy was the relatively low sensitivity (< 0.10) and Jaccard index (< 0.05) of global tractography for tracking long-distance fibers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For CSD-based tractography at an angle threshold of 40°, interhemispheric specificity ranged from 0.68 to 0.78.
“For CSD-based tractography, at an angle threshold of 40°, the interhemispheric sensitivity ranged from 0.42 to 0.54 and the specificity from 0.68 to 0.78, whereas for CSD-SIFT-based tractograms, sensitivity ranged from 0.26 to 0.34 and specificity from 0.83 to 0.90.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For DT-based tractography, the Jaccard index decreased for intrahemispheric connections from 0.35 to 0.17 with increasing group incidence threshold.
“For DT-based tractography, the Jaccard index decreased for both intrahemispheric (from 0.35 to 0.17) and interhemispheric connections (from 0.15 to 0.04).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For interhemispheric connections, global tractography specificity ranged from 0.87 ± 0.02 to 0.99 ± 0.01.
“For interhemispheric connections, sensitivity ranged from 0.06 ± 0.01 to 0.29 ± 0.03, and specificity from 0.87 ± 0.02 to 0.99 ± 0.01.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
Similar patterns of SIFT effects were found for intrahemispheric connections as well as for DT-based and DT-SIFT-based tractograms.
“Similar patterns were found for intrahemispheric connections as well as for DT-based and DT-SIFT-based tractograms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For CSD-based tractography, the network density ranged from 0.13 to 0.68 over all network reconstructions.
“The network density ranged from 0.13 to 0.68 over all network reconstructions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
For CSD-based tractography at an angle threshold of 40°, interhemispheric sensitivity ranged from 0.42 to 0.54.
“For CSD-based tractography, at an angle threshold of 40°, the interhemispheric sensitivity ranged from 0.42 to 0.54 and the specificity from 0.68 to 0.78, whereas for CSD-SIFT-based tractograms, sensitivity ranged from 0.26 to 0.34 and specificity from 0.83 to 0.90.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Jaccard index increased from 0.25 to 0.33 for intrahemispheric connections with increasing connection potentials.
“The Jaccard index increased from 0.07 to 0.16 for interhemispheric connections and from 0.25 to 0.33 for intrahemispheric connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For all tractography algorithms, with increasing group incidence threshold, connectome reconstruction sensitivity decreased.
“For all tractography algorithms, we found that with increasing threshold (i.e., including connections with increasing incidence—or consistency—across rats) connectome reconstruction sensitivity decreased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For DT-based tractography (250,000 streamlines, FA threshold 0.2), interhemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.52 to 0.04 with increasing group incidence threshold.
“Intrahemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0. 75 to 0.20, while specificity increased from 0.44 to 0.92 and interhemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.52 to 0.04, whereas specificity increased from 0.60 to 0.99.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
The trade-off between reconstruction sensitivity and specificity varies considerably over a range of settings and streamline- or group-based thresholds.
“However, we found, as indicated by differing Jaccard indices that the trade-off between reconstruction sensitivity and specificity varies considerably over a range of settings and streamline- or group-based thresholds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For all three algorithms, and over all parameter settings, sensitivity of detecting intrahemispheric connections was consistently higher than sensitivity of interhemispheric connection detection.
“For all three algorithms, and over all parameter settings, the sensitivity of detecting intrahemispheric connection detection was consistently higher than the sensitivity of interhemispheric connection detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
Inspection of the data revealed that many FODs, representing (multiple) crossing fibers, contained multiple high FOD amplitudes.
“However, inspection of our data revealed that many FODs, representing (multiple) crossing fibers, contained multiple high FOD amplitudes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At a particle potential of 0.01, interhemispheric sensitivity increased from 0.07 to 0.29 with increasing connection potentials.
“At a particle potential of 0.01, sensitivity increased from 0.07 to 0.29 (interhemispheric) and from 0.33 to 0.62 (intrahemispheric), while specificity decreased from 0.99 to 0.87 (interhemispheric) and from 0.84 to 0.59 (intrahemispheric) with increasing connection potentials (i.e., more connections being formed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For intrahemispheric connections, global tractography sensitivity varied from 0.24 ± 0.02 to 0.62 ± 0.05 over all parameter settings.
“At connectome level and over all sets of parameter settings, sensitivity varied from 0.24 ± 0.02 to 0.62 ± 0.05, and specificity from 0.59 ± 0.03 to 0.90 ± 0.01 for intrahemispheric connections [mean ± SD (at group level)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For DT-based tractography (250,000 streamlines, FA threshold 0.2), intrahemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.75 to 0.20 with increasing group incidence threshold.
“Intrahemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0. 75 to 0.20, while specificity increased from 0.44 to 0.92 and interhemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.52 to 0.04, whereas specificity increased from 0.60 to 0.99.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
Long-distance streamlines were lacking in some sets of parameter settings (e.g., at a connection potential of 0.1) for global tractography.
“Long-distance streamlines were even lacking in some sets of parameter settings (e.g., at a connection potential of 0.1) for global tractography.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Sensitivity and specificity were mostly affected by the connection potential.
“Sensitivity and specificity were mostly affected by the connection potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For both DT- and CSD-based tractography, specificity increased after SIFT.
“For both DT- and CSD-based tractography, sensitivity decreased, whereas specificity increased after SIFT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
The analyses revealed clear differences in reconstruction sensitivity and specificity dependent on the site (within or between hemispheres) and length of connections.
“Our analyses revealed clear differences in reconstruction sensitivity and specificity dependent on the site (running within or between hemispheres) and length of connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The different tractography approaches presented considerable differences in connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.
“However, the different tractography approaches presented considerable differences in connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For DT-based tractography, the Jaccard index decreased for interhemispheric connections from 0.15 to 0.04 with increasing group incidence threshold.
“For DT-based tractography, the Jaccard index decreased for both intrahemispheric (from 0.35 to 0.17) and interhemispheric connections (from 0.15 to 0.04).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The density of global tractography-based networks ranged from 0.07 to 0.34.
“The density of global tractography-based networks ranged from 0.07 to 0.34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The step size and angle threshold (for CSD- and DT-based tractography) and FOD threshold (for CSD-based tractography) had almost no effect on connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.
“The step size and angle threshold (for CSD- and DT-based tractography) and FOD threshold (for CSD-based tractography) had almost no effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Jaccard index increased from 0.07 to 0.16 for interhemispheric connections with increasing connection potentials.
“The Jaccard index increased from 0.07 to 0.16 for interhemispheric connections and from 0.25 to 0.33 for intrahemispheric connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For intrahemispheric connections, global tractography specificity varied from 0.59 ± 0.03 to 0.90 ± 0.01 over all parameter settings.
“At connectome level and over all sets of parameter settings, sensitivity varied from 0.24 ± 0.02 to 0.62 ± 0.05, and specificity from 0.59 ± 0.03 to 0.90 ± 0.01 for intrahemispheric connections [mean ± SD (at group level)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
The FOD threshold had minimal effect on tract reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.
“The FOD threshold had minimal effect on tract reconstruction sensitivity and specificity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
- Findingown data
For all tractography algorithms, with increasing streamline threshold, connectome reconstruction sensitivity decreased.
“For all tractography algorithms, we found that with increasing streamline threshold, connectome reconstruction sensitivity decreased, whereas specificity increased (Figures S10 and S11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingreasoning
The number of streamlines (for CSD- and DT-based tractography) and connection potential (GT) were positively related to sensitivity.
“The number of streamlines (for CSD- and DT-based tractography) and connection potential (GT) were positively related to sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Jaccard index showed a non-linear decrease with increasing inter-regional distance.
“Also, the Jaccard index showed a non-linear decrease with increasing inter-regional distance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For DT-based tractography (250,000 streamlines, FA threshold 0.2), intrahemispheric specificity increased from 0.44 to 0.92 with increasing group incidence threshold.
“Intrahemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0. 75 to 0.20, while specificity increased from 0.44 to 0.92 and interhemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.52 to 0.04, whereas specificity increased from 0.60 to 0.99.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For all three algorithms, and over all parameter settings, specificity was lower for detection of intrahemispheric connections than for interhemispheric connections.
“In contrast, specificity was lower for detection of intrahemispheric connections than for interhemispheric connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
Global tractography had relatively low sensitivity (< 0.10) for tracking long-distance fibers.
“Noteworthy was the relatively low sensitivity (< 0.10) and Jaccard index (< 0.05) of global tractography for tracking long-distance fibers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With increasing fiber length, there was a non-linear decrease in sensitivity for DT-based, CSD-based and global tractography.
“Overall, with increasing fiber length, there was a non-linear decrease in sensitivity, be it with different patterns for DT-based, CSD-based and global tractography, together with a non-linear increase in specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For DT-based tractography, the Jaccard index decreased with increasing streamline thresholds for interhemispheric connections from 0.14 to 0.05.
“For DT-based tractography, the Jaccard index decreased with increasing streamline thresholds, for both interhemispheric (i.e., from 0.14 to 0.05) and intrahemispheric (i.e., from 0.31 to 0.17) connections (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Particle potential showed less influence on sensitivity and specificity than connection potential.
“Particle potential (i.e., amount and distribution of particles) showed less influence on sensitivity and specificity, although for higher particle potentials, (i.e., 0.2 and 0.5) sensitivity was lower and specificity tended to be higher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CSD-based tractography outperformed global tractography for reconstruction of long-distance connections.
“CSD-based tractography outperformed global tractography for reconstruction of long-distance connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For DT-based tractography (250,000 streamlines, FA threshold 0.2), interhemispheric specificity increased from 0.60 to 0.99 with increasing group incidence threshold.
“Intrahemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0. 75 to 0.20, while specificity increased from 0.44 to 0.92 and interhemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.52 to 0.04, whereas specificity increased from 0.60 to 0.99.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
The study did not reveal an improvement in correspondence between reconstructed connectomes and neuroanatomical connectivity after SIFT correction.
“However, our study did not reveal an improvement in correspondence between reconstructed connectomes and neuroanatomical connectivity after SIFT correction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For all tractography algorithms, with increasing group incidence threshold, specificity increased.
“At the same time, specificity increased.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
For CSD-SIFT-based tractograms at an angle threshold of 40°, interhemispheric specificity ranged from 0.83 to 0.90.
“For CSD-based tractography, at an angle threshold of 40°, the interhemispheric sensitivity ranged from 0.42 to 0.54 and the specificity from 0.68 to 0.78, whereas for CSD-SIFT-based tractograms, sensitivity ranged from 0.26 to 0.34 and specificity from 0.83 to 0.90.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At a particle potential of 0.01, intrahemispheric sensitivity increased from 0.33 to 0.62 with increasing connection potentials.
“At a particle potential of 0.01, sensitivity increased from 0.07 to 0.29 (interhemispheric) and from 0.33 to 0.62 (intrahemispheric), while specificity decreased from 0.99 to 0.87 (interhemispheric) and from 0.84 to 0.59 (intrahemispheric) with increasing connection potentials (i.e., more connections being formed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
With increasing fiber length, there was a non-linear increase in specificity for DT-based, CSD-based and global tractography.
“Overall, with increasing fiber length, there was a non-linear decrease in sensitivity, be it with different patterns for DT-based, CSD-based and global tractography, together with a non-linear increase in specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
- Findingown data
Similar patterns of streamline threshold effects were found for CSD-based and global tractography.
“Similar patterns were found for CSD-based and global tractography (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Jaccard index decreased after applying SIFT.
“The Jaccard index decreased after applying SIFT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At a particle potential of 0.01, intrahemispheric specificity decreased from 0.84 to 0.59 with increasing connection potentials.
“At a particle potential of 0.01, sensitivity increased from 0.07 to 0.29 (interhemispheric) and from 0.33 to 0.62 (intrahemispheric), while specificity decreased from 0.99 to 0.87 (interhemispheric) and from 0.84 to 0.59 (intrahemispheric) with increasing connection potentials (i.e., more connections being formed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Similar patterns of group incidence threshold effects were found for CSD-based and global tractography.
“Similar patterns were found for CSD-based and global tractography (Figures S2–S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At a particle potential of 0.01, interhemispheric specificity decreased from 0.99 to 0.87 with increasing connection potentials.
“At a particle potential of 0.01, sensitivity increased from 0.07 to 0.29 (interhemispheric) and from 0.33 to 0.62 (intrahemispheric), while specificity decreased from 0.99 to 0.87 (interhemispheric) and from 0.84 to 0.59 (intrahemispheric) with increasing connection potentials (i.e., more connections being formed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study observed notable differences between tractography algorithms and parameter settings that should be taken into account for application in connectivity studies and subsequent network analyses.
“Despite the general trade-off between reconstruction sensitivity and specificity, we observed notable differences between tractography algorithms and parameter settings that should be taken into account for application in connectivity studies and subsequent network analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Reconstruction sensitivity and specificity may be influenced by streamline thresholding or group-based analysis (incidence thresholds).
“Lastly, reconstruction sensitivity and specificity may be influenced by streamline thresholding or group-based analysis (i.e., incidence thresholds, which might increase robustness against inter-subject variation), which might be employed to decrease the number of false positive reconstructions to satisfy the suggested 2:1 rule (Zalesky et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zalesky et al. 2016 source
- Findingown data
Specific DT and global tractography parameter settings can satisfy the 2:1 rule (at least twice as many false negatives compared to false positives).
“Our data show that specific DT and global tractography parameter settings can satisfy this rule.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zalesky et al. 2016 source
- Premisereasoning
Validation of whole-brain connectome reconstruction from contemporary diffusion-based tractography approaches is currently lacking.
“However, validation of whole-brain connectome reconstruction (i.e., structural connectivity between multiple brain regions) from contemporary diffusion-based tractography approaches is currently lacking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The tracer-based connectome covers all cortical atlas regions.
“This tracer-based connectome covers all cortical atlas regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmitt and Eipert 2012 source
- Interpretationown data
Despite the potential of CSD-based and global tractography to handle complex fiber orientations at voxel level, reconstruction accuracy, especially for long-distance connections, remains a challenge.
“Despite the potential of CSD-based and global tractography to handle complex fiber orientations at voxel level, reconstruction accuracy, especially for long-distance connections, remains a challenge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The rat connectome database contains more than 450,237 ipsi- and 175,654 contralateral connections from more than 6183 peer reviewed publications describing connectivity observations based on anterograde and retrograde neuronal tracer injections in normal juvenile or adult rats.
“This database contains more than 450,237 ipsi- and 175,654 contralateral connections from more than 6183 peer reviewed publications which describe connectivity observations based on anterograde and retrograde neuronal tracer injections in normal juvenile or adult rats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmitt and Eipert 2012 source
- Interpretationreasoning
A change in the number of false positives through adjustment of tractography parameter settings is not linearly scaled with the change in number of false negatives (and true positives).
“This means that a change in the number of false positives through adjustment of tractography parameter settings is not linearly scaled with the change in number of false negatives (and true positives).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The bidirectional and nested nature of neuroanatomical connections complicates the assignment of an absolute or relative measure of connection weight and directionality.
“This complicates the assignment of an absolute or relative measure of connection weight and directionality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It may be more complicated for CSD to satisfy the 2:1 rule, because CSD typically generates high density networks and relatively large numbers of false positives.
“However, this may be more complicated for CSD, which typically generates high density networks and relatively large numbers of false positives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The high rate of false negative reconstructions for long-distance connections may lead to omissions in identification of important inter-modular hub-node connections.
“In agreement with previous studies (Zalesky and Fornito 2009; Jbabdi et al. 2015), we found a relatively high rate of false negative reconstructions for connected cortical areas located at large distance from each other, especially for global tractography, which may consequently lead to omissions in identification of important inter-modular hub-node connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 47
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong-distance connections are more difficult to track, as reconstruction error accumulates with each tracking step.
“Consequently, long-distance connections are more difficult to track, as the reconstruction error accumulates with each tracking step (Zalesky and Fornito 2009; Jbabdi et al. 2015; Reveley et al. 2015; Donahue et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Zalesky and Fornito 2009 source
- cites Jbabdi et al. 2015 source
Section 3.1 says tractography uses local orientation information to infer long-range connections, can take wrong turns, and is affected by the distance a pathway travels. It does not state that reconstruction error accumulates with each tracking step, so the claimed mechanism is not established by this source. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Reveley et al. 2015 source
The Results report that track lines often become trapped in superficial white matter and fail to reach distant targets, supporting the difficulty of tracking long-range connections. The paper attributes that difficulty to local fiber structure; the passages do not establish that reconstruction error accumulates with each tracking step. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe anatomical accuracy of diffusion-weighted tractography continues to be a matter of controversy, and reconstructing connectomes with both high sensitivity and high specificity remains challenging.
“However, the anatomical accuracy of diffusion-weighted tractography, which infers neuronal pathways from tissue water diffusion direction, continues to be a matter of controversy, and reconstructing connectomes with both high sensitivity and high specificity remains challenging (Sporns et al. 2005; Bastiani et al. 2012; Jbabdi et al. 2013, 2015; Thomas et al. 2014; Azadbakht et al. 2015; Calabrese”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Sporns et al. 2005 source
In “Macroscale: Brain Regions and Pathways” (page unavailable), the paper says the relationship between diffusion-imaging results, fiber tracts, and neuronal connections remains controversial, and it describes limitations in acquisition and processing. It also says no single mapping method is likely to be sufficiently comprehensive. It does not specifically address the challenge of achieving both high sensitivity and high specificity in reconstructed connectomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Bastiani et al. 2012 source
- cites Jbabdi et al. 2013 source
The Discussion (Multimodal comparative anatomy; page unavailable) identifies a tractography failure and explains that small fascicles embedded in grey matter are difficult to track. This supports concern about anatomical accuracy, but the paper does not establish the broader claim that reconstructing connectomes with both high sensitivity and high specificity remains challenging. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCSD-based tractography solves some typical tractography errors, but false positive tract reconstructions may still arise from noisy peaks or from ambiguous fanning and bending fiber populations.
“This solves some of the typical tractography errors, but false positive tract reconstructions may still arise from noisy (spurious) peaks or from ambiguous fanning and bending fiber populations (Jbabdi and Johansen-Berg 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jbabdi and Johansen-Berg 2011 source
In “Low level modelling” (page unavailable), the paper says spherical-deconvolution fibre models have improved tractography, while unmodelled fanning can produce false positives. It also describes errors associated with sharp bends and noise-related uncertainty. It does not specifically identify noisy or spurious peaks as a cause of false-positive reconstructions, or establish the claimed improvement specifically for CSD-based tractography. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe angle threshold might still have affected specific pathway reconstructions in the brain.
“However, the angle threshold might still have affected specific pathway reconstructions in the brain (Thomas et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Thomas et al. 2014 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe large number of invalid tract reconstructions observed stresses the relatively ill-posed nature of current tractography approaches and the need for methodological progression.
“The large number of invalid tract reconstructions we observed in our study, in line with a recent study on human tract reconstructions (Maier-Hein et al. 2016), stresses the relatively ill-posed nature of current tractography approaches and the need for methodological progression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Maier-Hein et al. 2016 source
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMost neuroanatomical connections are at least to a certain degree bidirectional and contain nested sub-regions with their own connections and corresponding weights.
“While this was recently done to compare measures of connectivity strength between diffusion tractography and tract tracing data from macaque brain (van den Heuvel et al. 2015; Donahue et al. 2016), most neuroanatomical connections are at least to a certain degree bidirectional and contain nested sub-regions with their own connections and corresponding weights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCSD-based tractography led to the highest sensitivity for both inter- and intrahemispheric connections, but the lowest specificity, whereas global tractography resulted in the lowest sensitivity for both inter- and intrahemispheric connections, but the highest specificity.
“CSD-based tractography led to the highest sensitivity for both inter- and intrahemispheric connections, but the lowest specificity, whereas global tractography resulted in the lowest sensitivity for both inter- and intrahemispheric connections, but the highest specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor DT-based tractography, at connectome level and over all sets of parameter settings, sensitivity varied from 0.22 ± 0.04 to 0.61 ± 0.02, and specificity from 0.60 ± 0.02 to 0.88 ± 0.02 for intrahemispheric connections.
“At connectome level and over all sets of parameter settings, sensitivity varied from 0.22 ± 0.04 to 0.61 ± 0.02, and specificity from 0.60 ± 0.02 to 0.88 ± 0.02 for intrahemispheric connections [mean ± SD (at group level)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver all sets of parameter settings, an increase in number of streamlines led to higher sensitivity and lower specificity values.
“Over all sets of parameter settings, an increase in number of streamlines led to higher sensitivity and lower specificity values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDT-based and global tractography-based streamlines show mostly smoothly delineated fibers, whereas CSD-based streamlines show a more irregular pattern with many crossing fibers.
“DT-based and global tractography-based streamlines show mostly smoothly delineated fibers, whereas CSD-based streamlines show a more irregular pattern with many crossing fibers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a parameter range trade-off between sensitivity and specificity: sensitivity 0.06-0.63 interhemispherically and 0.22-0.86 intrahemispherically; specificity 0.99-0.60 interhemispherically and 0.99-0.23 intrahemispherically.
“There was a parameter range trade-off between sensitivity: 0.06–0.63 interhemispherically and 0.22–0.86 intrahemispherically; and specificity: 0.99–0.60 interhemispherically and 0.99–0.23 intrahemispherically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIncreasing FA thresholds, e.g., at an angle threshold of 40° and default step size (15 μm), decreased sensitivity from 0.58 to 0.35 for intrahemispheric and from 0.36 to 0.16 for interhemispheric connections, whereas specificity increased from 0.63 to 0.80 for intrahemispheric and from 0.80 to 0.90 for interhemispheric connections.
“Increasing FA thresholds (i.e., more strict fiber tracking), e.g., at an angle threshold of 40° and default step size (15 µm), decreased sensitivity from 0.58 to 0.35 for intrahemispheric and from 0.36 to 0.16 for interhemispheric connections, whereas specificity increased from 0.63 to 0.80 for intrahemispheric and from 0.80 to 0.90 for interhemispheric connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor DT-based tractography, for interhemispheric connections, sensitivity ranged from 0.09 ± 0.02 to 0.42 ± 0.04, and specificity from 0.75 ± 0.02 to 0.96 ± 0.01.
“For interhemispheric connections, sensitivity ranged from 0.09 ± 0.02 to 0.42 ± 0.04, and specificity from 0.75 ± 0.02 to 0.96 ± 0.01.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor CSD-based tractography, at connectome level and over all sets of parameter settings, sensitivity varied from 0.44 ± 0.04 to 0.86 ± 0.02, and specificity from 0.23 ± 0.02 to 0.78 ± 0.02 for intrahemispheric connections.
“At connectome level and over all sets of parameter settings, sensitivity varied from 0.44 ± 0.04 to 0.86 ± 0.02, and specificity from 0.23 ± 0.02 to 0.78 ± 0.02 for intrahemispheric connections [mean ± SD (at group level)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSimilarity (i.e., overlap) decreased as indicated by the Jaccard index from 0.32 to 0.24 and from 0.16 to 0.10 for, respectively, intra- and interhemispheric connections.
“Similarity (i.e., overlap) decreased as indicated by the Jaccard index from 0.32 to 0.24 and from 0.16 to 0.10 for, respectively, intra- and interhemispheric connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe tractography maps displayed various neuroanatomical pathways with high detail.
“The tractography maps displayed various neuroanatomical pathways with high detail.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt an FA threshold of 0.15, step size of 15 μm and angle threshold of 50°, from 25,000 to 250,000 streamlines, intrahemispheric sensitivity increased from 0.29 to 0.44, whereas specificity decreased from 0.85 to 0.72.
“For example, at an FA threshold of 0.15, step size of 15 µm and angle threshold of 50°, from 25,000 to 250,000 streamlines, intrahemispheric sensitivity increased from 0.29 to 0.44, whereas specificity decreased from 0.85 to 0.72.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn general, the Jaccard index was higher for both CSD-based and global tractography (specifically at higher connection potentials), but lower for DT-based tractography.
“In general, the Jaccard index was higher for both CSD-based and global tractography (specifically at higher connection potentials), but lower for DT-based tractography.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSimilar patterns were seen for interhemispheric connections.
“Similar patterns were seen for interhemispheric connections (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor CSD-based tractography, for interhemispheric connections, sensitivity ranged from 0.15 ± 0.02 to 0.63 ± 0.05, and specificity from 0.60 ± 0.05 to 0.95 ± 0.01.
“For interhemispheric connections, sensitivity ranged from 0.15 ± 0.02 to 0.63 ± 0.05, and specificity from 0.60 ± 0.05 to 0.95 ± 0.01.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataSimilar patterns and trade-offs were found when applying SIFT, streamline thresholding and group-based average network thresholding.
“Similar patterns and trade-offs were found, when we applied spherical deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms, streamline thresholding and group-based average network thresholding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIncrease in network density was associated with increase in sensitivity (more true positives), as well as with decrease in specificity, due to more false positives.
“Increase in network density was associated with increase in sensitivity (more true positives), as well as with decrease in specificity, due to more false positives (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningImprovements in sensitivity were invariably at the expense of specificity and vice versa.
“Improvements in sensitivity were invariably at the expense of specificity and vice versa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntrahemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.85 to 0.78, whereas specificity increased from 0.24 to 0.37.
“Intrahemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.85 to 0.78, whereas specificity increased from 0.24 to 0.37.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor CSD-based tractography, the Jaccard index of interhemispheric and intrahemispheric connections showed decreasing patterns with increasing group incidence threshold, although there were peaks depending on streamline number and location.
“Similarly, the Jaccard index of interhemispheric and intrahemispheric connections based on CSD-based tractography showed decreasing patterns, although there were peaks depending on streamline number and location (e.g., interhemispheric connections at 250,000 streamlines and an FOD threshold of 0.175 led to the highest Jaccard index at an incidence threshold of 0.4) (Figure S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver the same range, the Jaccard index slightly decreased from 0.18 to 0.17 for interhemispheric connections, while it slightly increased from 0.32 to 0.34 for intrahemispheric connections.
“Over the same range, the Jaccard index slightly decreased from 0.18 to 0.17 for interhemispheric connections, while it slightly increased from 0.32 to 0.34 for intrahemispheric connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor global tractography, the Jaccard index of inter- and intrahemispheric connections decreased with increasing group incidence threshold, with higher particle potentials leading to lower Jaccard indices.
“Also, the Jaccard index of inter- and intrahemispheric connections decreased for global tractography, although different patterns can be seen for different particle potentials (i.e., higher particle potentials led to lower Jaccard indices) (Figure S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor higher particle potentials (0.2 and 0.5), sensitivity was lower and specificity tended to be higher.
“Particle potential (i.e., amount and distribution of particles) showed less influence on sensitivity and specificity, although for higher particle potentials, (i.e., 0.2 and 0.5) sensitivity was lower and specificity tended to be higher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSensitivity and specificity varied to some extent over different angle thresholds, with a generally declining pattern for sensitivity and an increasing pattern for specificity at increasing angle thresholds.
“However, sensitivity and specificity varied to some extent over different angle thresholds, with a generally declining pattern for sensitivity and an increasing pattern for specificity at increasing angle thresholds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFA threshold (for DT-based tractography), particle potential (GT), group-based average network thresholding, streamline thresholding and filtering (SIFT) were negatively related to sensitivity.
“Conversely, FA threshold (for DT-based tractography), particle potential (GT), group-based average network thresholding, streamline thresholding and filtering (SIFT) were negatively related to sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough the amount of false positive connections decreased with increasing streamline threshold, the number of true positives decreased as well, specifically at higher thresholds.
“Although the amount of false positive connections decreased with increasing streamline threshold, the number of true positives decreased as well, specifically at higher thresholds (Figures S12 and S13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe number of true positives increased together with the number of false positives with increasing connection potentials, although there were generally more false positives.
“Again, the number of true positives increased together with the number of false positives, although there were generally more false positives (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDT and GT led to low sensitivity and high specificity, while CSD resulted in high sensitivity together with low specificity.
“While DT and GT led to low sensitivity and high specificity, CSD resulted in high sensitivity together with low specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith increasing angle thresholds (from 20 to 80°), at an FOD threshold of 0.1, interhemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.63 to 0.53, while specificity increased from 0.59 to 0.69.
“With increasing angle thresholds (i.e., from 20 to 80°), at an FOD threshold of 0.1, interhemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.63 to 0.53, while specificity increased from 0.59 to 0.69.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were more false positives and true positives at an angle of 80° for both intra- and interhemispheric connections.
“However, there were more false positives and true positives at an angle of 80° for both intra- and interhemispheric connections (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study detected a considerable number of false positive and false negative connectivity reconstructions, which increased with increasing fiber lengths.
“Despite our ability to track a large variety of brain-wide neuronal fiber connections, we detected a considerable number of false positive and false negative connectivity reconstructions, which increased with increasing fiber lengths.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Jaccard index generally increased with higher number of streamlines for intra- and interhemispheric tract reconstructions, despite an increase in false positive tract reconstructions.
“The Jaccard index generally increased with higher number of streamlines for intra- and interhemispheric tract reconstructions, despite an increase in false positive tract reconstructions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver all sets of parameter settings, we measured slightly higher sensitivity, lower specificity and higher Jaccard index values with increasing number of streamlines, explained by an increase in true positives and a decrease in false negatives.
“Over all sets of parameter settings, we measured slightly higher sensitivity, lower specificity and higher Jaccard index values with increasing number of streamlines, explained by an increase in true positives and a decrease in false negatives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDT-based and CSD-based tractography algorithms were affected by connection distance, showing a non-linear decrease in sensitivity and Jaccard index, and a non-linear increase in specificity, with increasing connection distance.
“Our tested DT-based (i.e., deterministic) and CSD-based (i.e., probabilistic) tractography algorithms were affected by connection distance, showing a non-linear decrease in sensitivity and Jaccard index, and a non-linear increase in specificity, with increasing connection distance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCSD-based and global tractography yielded highest Jaccard indices for short-distance connections, which decreased for connections of longer distance.
“CSD-based and global tractography yielded highest Jaccard indices for short-distance connections, which decreased for connections of longer distance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataConventional deterministic DT-based and more advanced probabilistic CSD-based and global tractography approaches reconstruct the whole-brain connectome with comparable accuracy, with considerable amounts of false positive and false negative connections, which strongly depends on the algorithm and parameter settings.
“In conclusion, our study shows that conventional deterministic DT-based and more advanced probabilistic CSD-based and global tractography approaches reconstruct the whole-brain connectome with comparable accuracy, be it with considerable amounts of false positive and false negative connections, which strongly depends on the algorithm and parameter settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTractography conditions differ between intra- and interhemispheric connections as well as over different connection distances.
“Because tractography conditions differ between intra- and interhemispheric connections as well as over different connection distances, algorithms should be chosen purposefully and, if possible, combined to enable most reliable reconstruction of connectomes at large-scale network or whole-brain level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDiffusion MRI-based tractography is a useful and powerful technique to map structural connections non-invasively in animal and human brain at meso- and macro-level.
“Diffusion MRI-based tractography has offered exclusive means to map structural connections non-invasively in animal and human brain, and is considered a very useful and powerful technique to unravel the human connectome at meso- and macro-level (Le Bihan et al. 1986; Basser et al. 1994b; Mori et al. 1999; Jones 2008; Jbabdi and Johansen-Berg 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSIFT reduces local streamline density bias by filtering the tractogram to improve the fit between the overall distribution of streamlines and the FOD in every voxel, which may improve accuracy of connectome reconstruction.
“Recently, a new method, called spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms (SIFT) has been proposed to reduce local streamline density bias by filtering the tractogram (i.e., selectively removing streamlines) to improve the fit between the overall distribution of streamlines and the FOD in every voxel, estimated from the diffusion-weighted image, which may improve accuracy of connect”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCSD estimates multiple fiber directions within a voxel, resulting in a fiber orientation distribution (FOD) that may have multiple peaks.
“Instead of estimating one principal fiber direction, CSD estimates multiple fiber directions within a voxel, resulting in a fiber orientation distribution (FOD) that may have multiple peaks (e.g., four in case of two crossing fibers in one voxel) (Tournier et al. 2010, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tournier et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Tournier et al. 2012 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe increase of the Jaccard index is explained by a considerable increase in true positives (TP) and a decrease in false negatives (FN).
“This increase of the Jaccard index is again explained by a considerable increase in true positives (TP) and a decrease in false negatives (FN) (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGlobal tractography aims to find the full track configuration that most optimally fits the acquired data.
“Global tractography aims to find the full track (i.e., whole brain) configuration that most optimally fits the acquired data (Reisert et al. 2011; Mangin et al. 2013; Christiaens et al. 2015b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe angle thresholds and step sizes as applied in the study were within plausible neuroanatomical ranges, thereby not affecting the overall connectome reconstructions.
“Apparently, the angle thresholds and step sizes—both important factors related to tract curvature—as applied in our study were within plausible neuroanatomical ranges, thereby not affecting the overall connectome reconstructions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTo influence connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity, FOD thresholds should be increased to much higher values (far beyond the default 0.1 threshold), but this would probably lead to undesirable exclusion of many (truly) crossing fibers.
“Therefore, to influence the connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity, we should apparently increase the FOD thresholds to much higher values (i.e., far beyond the default 0.1 threshold), but this would probably lead to undesirable exclusion of many (truly) crossing fibers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningCorrection for eddy currents or bias field was not necessary because a special volume coil and MRI pulse sequence allowed homogenous imaging of post mortem brain tissue.
“Correction for eddy currents or bias field was not necessary, because we used a special volume coil and MRI pulse sequence (with extra delays after sinus-shaped gradients) that allowed homogenous imaging of post mortem brain tissue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of FOD threshold impact may be explained by the different natures of DT-based (deterministic) and CSD-based (probabilistic) tractography or by the different natures of the FA and FOD thresholds.
“This may be explained by the different natures of DT-based tractography (i.e., deterministic) and CSD-based tractography (i.e., probabilistic) or by the different natures of the FA and FOD thresholds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe effects of FOD threshold adjustments may be different across species and datasets.
“Also, it should be noted that the effects of FOD threshold adjustments may be different across species and datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth number of streamlines and connection potential increased the total number of reconstructed connections, leading to a higher true positive rate.
“Both factors increased the total number of reconstructed connections, leading to a higher true positive rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study did not assess connectivity of subcortical regions, which biases conclusions towards cortical connectomics.
“We also did not assess connectivity of subcortical regions, which are less easily co-registerable to the rat brain anatomical atlas, which biases our conclusions towards cortical connectomics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe weights of neuronal connections were not considered in the study.
“Lastly, the weights of neuronal connections were not considered in our study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study only considered streamline endpoints in determining connectivity between two regions of interest, thereby ignoring the three-dimensional structure of anatomical pathways.
“Another point is that we only considered streamline endpoints in determining connectivity between two regions of interest, thereby ignoring the three-dimensional structure of anatomical pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The Euclidean distance between region centers of gravity is a valid proxy for fiber length.
“We determined sensitivity, specificity and the Jaccard index of DT-based, CSD-based and global tractography for each distance category (i.e., as a proxy of fiber length).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The tracer-based connectome from the rat connectome database accurately represents true neuroanatomical connectivity (ground truth).
“Diffusion tractography-based connectivity networks were compared against the neuronal tracer-based network as ground truth, which yielded true positives (green lines and squares), false positives (red lines and squares), false negatives (dotted red lines and squares), and true negatives (no line and color-coding) (right column).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 106 cortical regions from the Paxinos and Watson atlas correspond to the regions used in the tracer database.
“We extracted connectivity information for the same 106 cortical regions (Table 1) as used for diffusion-based connectome reconstructions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Group-based average network thresholding improves signal-to-noise by including consistently found connections and controlling for particularities of individual rat networks.
“To assess the effect of group average-based connectome reconstruction, which may improve signal-to-noise by including consistently found connections and controlling for particularities of individual rat networks, we included connections based on incidence over all rats (N = 10) using different thresholds.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The neuroanatomical tracer data used as reference accurately represents the true connectivity of the rat brain.
“The connectome reconstructions were compared against neuroanatomical tracer data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rat brain anatomical atlas and region parcellation used are valid.
“We also did not assess connectivity of subcortical regions, which are less easily co-registerable to the rat brain anatomical atlas”
The paper relies on this without support.
The streamline endpoint criterion for connectivity is adequate for the study's conclusions.
“Another point is that we only considered streamline endpoints in determining connectivity between two regions of interest, thereby ignoring the three-dimensional structure of anatomical pathways.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The parameter settings tested are representative of the tractography algorithms' behavior.
“for a specific set of parameter settings for DT-based, CSD-based and global tractography (as representative examples)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Jaccard index is a valid measure of overall connectome reconstruction performance.
“overall performance (i.e., as expressed by the Jaccard index)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The group-based incidence thresholding is a valid method to increase robustness against inter-subject variation.
“group-based analysis (i.e., incidence thresholds, which might increase robustness against inter-subject variation)”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure 6 group-threshold analysis has conflicting FA thresholds
MinorThe results text says the illustrated DT-based group-threshold analysis uses an FA threshold of 0.2, while the Figure 6 caption specifies 0.15.
“Figure 6 (left panel) shows sensitivity against specificity (top), and Jaccard indices (bottom) for DT-based tractography (using 250,000 streamlines and an FA threshold of 0.2).”
“Left graph: reconstruction sensitivity (true positive rate; TPR) versus 1-specificity (false positive rate; FPR) (top) and Jaccard index (bottom) over group incidence thresholds with different angle thresholds (line color) for DT-based tractography (step size = 15 µm, FA threshold = 0.15 and 250,000 streamlines) (left graphs).”
Specificity is mislabeled as the false positive rate
MinorThe methods call specificity the false positive rate, but the figure caption correctly identifies the false positive rate as 1 minus specificity.
“Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created by plotting the sensitivity (TPR) against the specificity (false positive rate; FPR).”
“reconstruction sensitivity (true positive rate; TPR) versus 1-specificity (false positive rate; FPR)”
Reported particle potential was not among the tested values
MinorThe global-tractography results describe a particle potential of 0.01, whereas the methods list 0.1 as the lowest tested particle potential.
“At a particle potential of 0.01, sensitivity increased from 0.07 to 0.29 (interhemispheric) and from 0.33 to 0.62 (intrahemispheric)”
“particle potential (0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2 and 5)”
Reported global-tractography connection potential was not among the tested values
MinorThe distance analysis reports a connection potential of 1, although the methods list tested connection potentials only up to 0.5.
“as well as for global tractography (over all particle potentials and at a connection potential of 1).”
“connection potential (0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5).”
CSD angle comparison reverses the stated positive counts
MinorFrom 20° to 80°, the reported sensitivity falls and specificity rises for both connection types. With the same ground-truth connections, that means fewer true positives and fewer false positives at 80°, contrary to the subsequent statement.
“However, there were more false positives and true positives at an angle of 80° for both intra- and interhemispheric connections (data not shown).”
“With increasing angle thresholds (i.e., from 20 to 80°), at an FOD threshold of 0.1, interhemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.63 to 0.53, while specificity increased from 0.59 to 0.69. Intrahemispheric sensitivity decreased from 0.85 to 0.78, whereas specificity increased from 0.24 to 0.37.”
Cites
The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates
Palkovits, M. (1983) · Neuropeptides · doi:10.1016/0143-4179(83)90049-5 · Cited by 28,959 · see citing works
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
Paxinos, G., & Watson, C. (1983) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63235-9 · Cited by 28,585 · see citing works
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888 · see citing works
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 · Cited by 11,314 · see citing works
Fast robust automated brain extraction
Smith, S. M. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 · Cited by 10,496 · see citing works
A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images
Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. M. (2001) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6 · Cited by 6,806 · see citing works
MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging
Basser, P. J., Mattiello, J., & LeBihan, D. (1994) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80775-1 · Cited by 5,970 · see citing works
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589 · see citing works
Le Bihan, D., Breton, E., Lallemand, D., Grenier, P., Cabanis, E., & Laval-Jeantet, M. (1986) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 · Cited by 3,912 · see citing works
Estimation of the Effective Self-Diffusion Tensor from the NMR Spin Echo
Basser, P. J., Mattiello, J., & Bihan, D. L. (1994) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series B · doi:10.1006/jmrb.1994.1037 · Cited by 3,656 · see citing works
Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging
Mori, S., Crain, B. J., Chacko, V. P., & van Zijl, P. C. M. (1999) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199902)45:2 · Cited by 3,479 · see citing works
The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain
Sporns, O., Tononi, G., & Kötter, R. (2005) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 · Cited by 3,260 · see citing works
A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain
Oh, S. W., Harris, J. A., Ng, L., Winslow, B., Cain, N., Mihalas, S., Wang, Q., Lau, C., Kuan, L., Henry, A. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13186 · Cited by 2,612 · see citing works
The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective
Essen, D. C. V., Uǧurbil, K., Auerbach, E. J., Barch, D. M., Behrens, T. E. J., Bucholz, R. D., Chang, A., Chen, L., Corbetta, M., Curtiss, S. W., et al. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.018 · Cited by 2,605 · see citing works
Tournier, J., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.016 · Cited by 2,191 · see citing works
Networks of the Brain: Quantitative Analysis and Modeling
Sporns, O. (2010) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8476.001.0001 · Cited by 1,750 · see citing works
Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F., Gadian, D. G., & Connelly, A. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.037 · Cited by 1,635 · see citing works
MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions
Tournier, J., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2012) · International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · doi:10.1002/ima.22005 · Cited by 1,370 · see citing works
Tractography-based connectomes are dominated by false-positive connections
Maier-Hein, K. H., Neher, P., Houde, J.-C., Côté, M.-A., Garyfallidis, E., Zhong, J., Chamberland, M., Yeh, F.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Ji, Q., et al. (2016) · doi:10.1101/084137 · Cited by 1,361 · see citing works
Self-citationModern network science of neurological disorders
Stam, C. J. (2014) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3801 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Smith, R. E., Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.005 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory
van Wijk, B. C. M., Stam, C. J., & Daffertshofer, A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013701 · Cited by 1,161 · see citing works
Jeurissen, B., Leemans, A., Tournier, J., Jones, D. K., & Sijbers, J. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22099 · Cited by 1,088 · see citing works
Self-citationDiffusion tensor imaging and beyond
Tournier, J., Mori, S., & Leemans, A. (2011) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22924 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman brain networks in health and disease
Bassett, D. S., & Bullmore, E. T. (2009) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32832d93dd · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Chiang, A.-S., Lin, C.-Y., Chuang, C.-C., Chang, H.-M., Hsieh, C.-H., Yeh, C.-W., Shih, C.-T., Wu, J.-J., Wang, G.-T., Chen, Y.-C., et al. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.056 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Smith, R. E., Tournier, J., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.092 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms
Smith, R. E., Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.049 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Graph analysis of the human connectome: Promise, progress, and pitfalls
Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., & Breakspear, M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.087 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
Thomas, C., Ye, F. Q., Irfanoglu, M. O., Modi, P., Saleem, K. S., Leopold, D. A., & Pierpaoli, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1405672111 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Tractography: Where Do We Go from Here?
Jbabdi, S., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0033 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Yendiki, A. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2011.00023 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Studying connections in the living human brain with diffusion MRI
Jones, D. K. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.002 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Reveley, C., Seth, A. K., Pierpaoli, C., Silva, A. C., Yu, D., Saunders, R. C., Leopold, D. A., & Ye, F. Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1418198112 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Donahue, C. J., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Jbabdi, S., Hernandez-Fernandez, M., Behrens, T. E., Dyrby, T. B., Coalson, T., Kennedy, H., Knoblauch, K., Van Essen, D. C., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0493-16.2016 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution
Jeurissen, B., Leemans, A., Jones, D. K., Tournier, J., & Sijbers, J. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21032 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvanced database methodology for the Collation of Connectivity data on the Macaque brain (CoCoMac)
Stephan, K. E., Kamper, L., Bozkurt, A., Burns, G., Young, M. P., & Kötter, R. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0908 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Measuring macroscopic brain connections in vivo
Jbabdi, S., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Haber, S. N., Van Essen, D. C., & Behrens, T. E. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4134 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Global fiber reconstruction becomes practical
Reisert, M., Mader, I., Anastasopoulos, C., Weigel, M., Schnell, S., & Kiselev, V. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.016 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Progress and challenges in probing the human brain
Poldrack, R. A., & Farah, M. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15692 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Connectome sensitivity or specificity: which is more important?
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., Cocchi, L., Gollo, L. L., van den Heuvel, M. P., & Breakspear, M. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.035 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
The effects of SIFT on the reproducibility and biological accuracy of the structural connectome
Smith, R. E., Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.004 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Validation of in vitro probabilistic tractography
Dyrby, T. B., Søgaard, L. V., Parker, G. J., Alexander, D. C., Lind, N. M., Baaré, W. F. C., Hay-Schmidt, A., Eriksen, N., Pakkenberg, B., Paulson, O. B., et al. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.022 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Dauguet, J., Peled, S., Berezovskii, V., Delzescaux, T., Warfield, S. K., Born, R., & Westin, C.-F. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.067 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
A diffusion MRI tractography connectome of the mouse brain and comparison with neuronal tracer data
Calabrese, E., Badea, A., Cofer, G., Qi, Y., & Johnson, G. A. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv121 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Jbabdi, S., Lehman, J. F., Haber, S. N., & Behrens, T. E. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2457-12.2013 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Pascoe, M. C., Howells, D. W., Crewther, D. P., Constantinou, N., Carey, L. M., Rewell, S. S. J., Turchini, G. M., Kaur, G., & Crewther, S. G. (2014) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00014 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Similarity coefficient methods applied to the cell formation problem: A taxonomy and review
Yin, Y., & Yasuda, K. (2005) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.01.014 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Bastiani, M., Shah, N. J., Goebel, R., & Roebroeck, A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.002 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Tax, C. M. W., Jeurissen, B., Vos, S. B., Viergever, M. A., & Leemans, A. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.067 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationDrakesmith, M., Caeyenberghs, K., Dutt, A., Lewis, G., David, A. S., & Jones, D. K. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.011 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Global tractography of multi-shell diffusion-weighted imaging data using a multi-tissue model
Christiaens, D., Reisert, M., Dhollander, T., Sunaert, S., Suetens, P., & Maes, F. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.008 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationA DTI-Derived Measure of Cortico-Cortical Connectivity
Zalesky, A., & Fornito, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2008.2012113 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
The CONNECT project: Combining macro- and micro-structure
Assaf, Y., Alexander, D., Jones, D., Bizzi, A., Behrens, T. E., Clark, C., Cohen, Y., Dyrby, T., Hüppi, P., Knoesche, T., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.055 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
van den Heuvel, M. P., de Reus, M. A., Feldman Barrett, L., Scholtens, L. H., Coopmans, F. M. T., Schmidt, R., Preuss, T. M., Rilling, J. K., & Li, L. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22828 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Validation of tractography: Comparison with manganese tracing
Knösche, T. R., Anwander, A., Liptrot, M., & Dyrby, T. B. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22902 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Mangin, J.-F., Fillard, P., Cointepas, Y., Le Bihan, D., Frouin, V., & Poupon, C. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.009 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Brainnetome: A new -ome to understand the brain and its disorders
Jiang, T. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.002 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Validation of High-Resolution Tractography Against<i>In Vivo</i>Tracing in the Macaque Visual Cortex
Azadbakht, H., Parkes, L. M., Haroon, H. A., Augath, M., Logothetis, N. K., de Crespigny, A., D'Arceuil, H. E., & Parker, G. J. M. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu326 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Gao, Y., Choe, A. S., Stepniewska, I., Li, X., Avison, M. J., & Anderson, A. W. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075065 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
neuroVIISAS: Approaching Multiscale Simulation of the Rat Connectome
Schmitt, O., & Eipert, P. (2012) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-012-9141-6 · Cited by 51 · cited 2× · see citing works
“2014), rat (Schmitt and Eipert 2012), macaque (Stephan et al.”
MethodSelf-citationMajka, P., Kublik, E., Furga, G., et al. (2012) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9138-6 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Global tractography with embedded anatomical priors for quantitative connectivity analysis
Lemkaddem, A., Skiöldebrand, D., Dal Palú, A., Thiran, J.-P., & Daducci, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00232 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Chen, H., Liu, T., Zhao, Y., Zhang, T., Li, Y., Li, M., Zhang, H., Kuang, H., Guo, L., Tsien, J. Z., et al. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.050 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Gangoiti, J., Lamothe, L. M., van Leeuwen, S. S., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172622 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Early life stress-induced alterations in rat brain structures measured with high resolution MRI
Sarabdjitsingh, R. A., Loi, M., Joëls, M., Dijkhuizen, R. M., & van der Toorn, A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185061 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationBayesian inference of structural brain networks
Hinne, M., Heskes, T., Beckmann, C. F., & van Gerven, M. A. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.068 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Thomas, J. H. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7911601 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Deterministic and Probabilistic Q-Ball Tractography: from Diffusion to Sharp Fiber Distribution
Descoteaux, M., Rachid Deriche, B., & Anwander, A. (2007) · HAL · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Training shortest-path tractography: Automatic learning of spatial priors
Kasenburg, N., Liptrot, M. G., Reislev, N. L., Ørting, S. N., Nielsen, M., Garde, E., & Feragen, A. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.031 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Bayesian Inference of Whole-Brain NetworksPreprint
Hinne, M., Heskes, T., & van Gerven, M. A. J. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1202.1696 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Atlas-Guided Global Tractography: Imposing a Prior on the Local Track Orientation
Christiaens, D., Reisert, M., Dhollander, T., Maes, F., Sunaert, S. G., & Suetens, P. (2014) · Mathematics and visualization · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11182-7_11 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationImposing label priors in global tractography can resolve crossing fibre ambiguities
Christiaens, D., Maes, F., Sunaert, S. G., et al. (2015) · Lirias · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationFigShare neuroimaging dataset Sarabdjitsingh 2017.xlsx
Sarabdjitsingh, A., Loi, M., Joëls, M., et al. (2017) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5285401 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationBasser (2000) · doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A (2010) Improved probabilistic streamlines tractography by 2nd order integration over fibre orientation distributions. Ismrm 88:1670
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, F., Daducci, A., He, Y., Schiavi, S., Seguin, C., Smith, R. E., Yeh, C.-H., Zhao, T., & O’Donnell, L. J. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118870 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
“While many research studies have been performed to compare different tractography algorithms [34, 344, 410, 491, 336, 532, 141], there is no consensus on “the best algorithm.”
BackgroundMandonnet, E., Sarubbo, S., & Petit, L. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2018.00094 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Controversies and progress on standardization of large-scale brain network nomenclature
Uddin, L. Q., Betzel, R. F., Cohen, J. R., Damoiseaux, J. S., Brigard, F. D., Eickhoff, S. B., Fornito, A., Gratton, C., Gordon, E. M., Laird, A. R., et al. (2023) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00323 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“…et al., 2012; Baum et al., 2018; Drakesmith et al., 2015; Jung et al., 2021; Maier-Hein et al., 2017; Oldham et al., 2020; Parker et al., 2014; Sinke et al., 2018; Zhong et al., 2015) (see section Network Affiliations of Subcortical Structures), and the effect of these analytic choices on the…”
What’s new and what’s next in diffusion MRI preprocessing
Tax, C., Bastiani, M., Veraart, J., Garyfallidis, E., & Irfanoglu, M. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118830 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Straathof, M., Sinke, M. R. T., Dijkhuizen, R. M., & Otte, W. M. (2018) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x18809547 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationHuang, C., Rolls, E. T., Hsu, C. H., Feng, J., & Lin, C. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab113 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Primate homologs of mouse cortico-striatal circuits
Balsters, J. H., Zerbi, V., Sallet, J., Wenderoth, N., & Mars, R. B. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53680 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Zhang, F., Wu, Y., Norton, I., Rathi, Y., Golby, A. J., & O'Donnell, L. J. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24579 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Oldham, S., Arnatkevičiūtė, A., Smith, R. E., Tiego, J., Bellgrove, M. A., & Fornito, A. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117252 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
White matter damage and degeneration in traumatic brain injury.
Armstrong, R. C., Sullivan, G. M., Perl, D. P., Rosarda, J. D., & Radomski, K. L. (2024) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2024.07.003 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Delettre, C., Messé, A., Dell, L.-A., Foubet, O., Heuer, K., Larrat, B., Meriaux, S., Mangin, J.-F., Reillo, I., de Juan Romero, C., et al. (2019) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00098 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience
Douw, L., van Dellen, E., Gouw, A. A., Griffa, A., de Haan, W., van den Heuvel, M. P., Hillebrand, A., Mieghem, P. V., Nissen, I. A., Otte, W. M., et al. (2019) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00103 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationKlooster, D., Vos, I. N., Caeyenberghs, K., Leemans, A., Dávid, S., Besseling, R. M. H., Aldenkamp, A. P., & Baeken, C. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.190088 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationU-shape short-range extrinsic connectivity organisation around the human central sulcus
Pron, A., Deruelle, C., & Coulon, O. (2020) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02177-5 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Planchuelo‐Gómez, Á., García‐Azorín, D., Peral, Á. L. G., Aja‐Fernández, S., Rodríguez, M., & de Luis-Garcı́a, R. (2019) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102419885392 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Altered brain white matter connectome in children and adolescents with prenatal alcohol exposure
Long, X., Little, G. E., Treit, S., Beaulieu, C., Gong, G., & Lebel, C. A. (2020) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02064-z · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Schiavi, S., Petracca, M., Battocchio, M., Mendili, M. M. E., Paduri, S., Fleysher, L., Inglese, M., & Daducci, A. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24989 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The Ansa Subthalamica: A Neglected Fiber Tract
Alho, E. J. L., Alho, A. T. D. L., Horn, A., Martin, M. D. G. M., Edlow, B. L., Fischl, B. R., Nagy, J., Fonoff, E. T., Hamani, C., & Heinsen, H. (2019) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.27901 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Temiz, G., Sébille, S. B., François, C., Bardinet, É., & Karachi, C. (2019) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-019-02012-6 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Interactions Between Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease on Structural Brain Networks
Wu, Z., Gao, Y., Potter, T. B. H., Benoit, J. S., Shen, J. F., Schulz, P. E., Zhang, Y., & Initiative, A. T. A. D. N. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.639795 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Zerbi, V., Markicevic, M., Gasparini, F., Schroeter, A., Rudin, M., & Wenderoth, N. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.051 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The R1-weighted connectome: complementing brain networks with a myelin-sensitive measure
Boshkovski, T., Kocarev, L., Cohen‐Adad, J., Mišić, B., Lehéricy, S., Stikov, N., & Mancini, M. (2021) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00179 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Straathof, M., Sinke, M. R. T., Roelofs, T. J. M., Blezer, E. L. A., Sarabdjitsingh, R. A., van der Toorn, A., Schmitt, O., Otte, W. M., & Dijkhuizen, R. M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56834-9 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationHow Human Is Human Connectional Neuroanatomy?
Rushmore, J., Sylvain Bouix, A., Kubicki, M. R., Yogesh Rathi, A., Yeterian, E. H., & Makris, N. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2020.00018 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Modulation of Nigrofugal and Pallidofugal Pathways in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease
Avecillas-Chasin, J. M., & Honey, C. R. (2019) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz544 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Skandalakis, G. P., Komaitis, S., Kalyvas, A., Lani, E., Kontrafouri, C., Drosos, E., Liakos, F., Piagkou, M., Placantonakis, D. G., Golfinos, J. G., et al. (2020) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2020.2.jns193177 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Bertino, S., Basile, G. A., Bramanti, A., Ciurleo, R., Tisano, A., Anastasi, G., Milardi, D., & Cacciola, A. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118519 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Gutierrez, C. E., Skibbe, H., Nakae, K., Tsukada, H., Liénard, J., Watakabe, A., Hata, J., Reisert, M., Woodward, A., Yamaguchi, Y., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78284-4 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Kurokawa, R., Kamiya, K., Inui, S., Kato, S., Suzuki, F., Amemiya, S., Shinozaki, T., Takanezawa, D., Kohashi, R., & Abe, O. (2021) · Neuroradiology · doi:10.1007/s00234-021-02732-9 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Straathof, M., Sinke, M. R. T., van der Toorn, A., Weerheim, P. L., Otte, W. M., & Dijkhuizen, R. M. (2018) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2018.08.003 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantification of Structural Brain Connectivity via a Conductance Model
Frau‐Pascual, A., Fogarty, M., Fischl, B. R., Yendiki, A., Aganj, I., & Initiativey, †. T. A. D. N. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.033 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Microsurgical anatomy of the amygdaloid body and its connections
Weiss, A., Carlo, D. T. D., di Russo, P., Weiss, F., Castagna, M., Cosottini, M., & Perrini, P. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02214-3 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Controversies and progress on standardization of large-scale brain network nomenclaturePreprint
Uddin, L. Q., Betzel, R. F., Cohen, J. R., Damoiseaux, J. S., Brigard, F. D., Eickhoff, S. B., Fornito, A., Gratton, C., Gordon, E. M., Laird, A., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/25za6 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Mapping covariance in brain FDG uptake to structural connectivity
Yakushev, I. Y., Ripp, I., Wang, M., Savio, A. M., Schütte, M., Lizarraga, A., Bogdanović, B., Diehl‐Schmid, J., Hedderich, D. M., Grimmer, T., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05590-y · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A critical review of connectome validation studies
Sarwar, T., Ramamohanarao, K., & Zalesky, A. (2021) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.4605 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Finding maximally disconnected subnetworks with shortest path tractography
Greene, C. A., Cieslak, M., Volz, L. J., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101903 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Secondary Degeneration of White Matter After Focal Sensorimotor Cortical Ischemic Stroke in Rats
Li, Z., Gao, H., Zeng, P., Jia, Y., Kong, X., Xu, K., & Bai, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.611696 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Müller, H.-P., Roselli, F., Rasche, V., & Kassubek, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00734 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Zhang, F., Daducci, A., He, Y., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.11644 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Blurred streamlines: A novel representation to reduce redundancy in tractography
Gabusi, I., Battocchio, M., Bosticardo, S., Schiavi, S., & Daducci, A. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103101 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Liakos, F., Komaitis, S., Drosos, E., et al. (2021) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.012 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Dávid, S., Mesri, H. Y., Bodiut, V. A., Nagtegaal, S., Elhalawani, H. M., Luca, A. D., Philippens, M. E. P., Viergever, M. A., Mohamed, A., Ding, Y., et al. (2019) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/19005157 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationAlizadeh, M., Manmatharayan, A., Johnston, T. E., et al. (2021) · Spinal Cord Series and Cases · doi:10.1038/s41394-021-00424-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Alho, E. J. L., Fonoff, E. T., Alho, A. T. D. L., Nagy, J., & Heinsen, H. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02187-3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Simulated Attack Reveals How Lesions Affect Network Properties in Poststroke Aphasia
Medaglia, J. D., Erickson, B. A., Pustina, D., Kelkar, A. S., DeMarco, A. T., Dickens, J. V., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1163-21.2022 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Connectome-based prediction of functional impairment in experimental stroke models
Schmitt, O., Eipert, P., Wang, Y., Kanoke, A., Rabiller, G., & Liu, J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0310743 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Verifications, reliability and reproducibility studies of the rat connectome managed in neuroVIISAS showed that the collation of neuronal connections based on tract tracing studies have a low interrater variability [48] and can be reproduced with other methods [50].”
Self-citationBerlot, R., Koritnik, B., Pirtošek, Z., & Ray, N. J. (2021) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2021.117443 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Neher, P., Stieltjes, B., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00931-1_3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
MonkeyCBP: A Toolbox for Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Monkey Brain
He, B., Yang, Z., Fan, L., Gao, B., Li, H., Ye, C., You, B., & Jiang, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2020.00014 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The brainstem connectome database
Schmitt, O., Eipert, P., Ruß, F., Beier, J., Kadir, K., & Horn, A. K. E. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01219-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationSIFT in pathological connectomes: Follow‐up response to Smith and colleagues
Zalesky, A., Sarwar, T., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2020) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.28412 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mahani, F. S. N., Kalantari, A., Fink, G. R., Hoehn, M., & Aswendt, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1194630 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Wu, Z., Yu, J., Chen, X., & Shen, J. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-10703-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Neural plasticity, heterochrony, and the onto-phylogeny of consciousness
Iurato, G. (2025) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105661 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hou, Y., & Feng, B. (2020) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1544/1/012085 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Structural and effective brain connectivity in focal epilepsy
Jelsma, S. B., Zijlmans, M., Heijink, I. B., Hoefnagels, F. W. A., Raemaekers, M. A. H., Otte, W. M., van Klink, N. E. C., & van Blooijs, D. (2025) · Neuroimage Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent Implantable Devices in Human Neurological Surgery
Madroñero-Mariscal, R., Reyes-Guzmán, A. D. L., García-García, F., Peris, A. G., Polo, J. L., de Lope, Á. R., & López‐Dolado, E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81400-7_11 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Sampaio‐Baptista, C., de Weijer, A. D., van der Toorn, A., Otte, W. M., Winkler, A. M., Lazari, A., Salvan, P., Bannerman, D. M., Dijkhuizen, R. M., & Johansen‐Berg, H. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/661546 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationGutierrez, C. E., Skibbe, H., Nakae, K., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.13215 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
MRI-based Measurement of Structural and Functional Connectivity in Health and Disease
Sinke, M. R. T. (2020) · doi:10.33540/77
Self-citationHabibi, A. T., Alaya, I. B., & Labidi, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88163-4_24
Simulated attack reveals how lesions affect network properties in post-stroke aphasiaPreprint
Medaglia, J. D., Erickson, B. A., Pustina, D., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.11.01.466833
Connectome-based prediction of functional impairment in experimental stroke modelsPreprint
Schmitt, O., Eipert, P., Wang, Y., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.05.539601
Self-citationLuca, A. D., & Leemans, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70337-9_5
Self-citationZalesky, A., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Jbabdi, S., & Fornito, A. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818894-1.00007-0
Preclinical and ex vivo tractography: Techniques and applications at high field
Aggarwal, M. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818894-1.00025-2
Tractography in pathological anatomy: Some general considerations
Theaud, G., Edde, M., Leemans, A., Dell’Acqua, F., Yang, J. Y., & Descoteaux, M. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818894-1.00036-7
Self-citationDeciphering nervous systems wiring: Tract-tracing and complementary methods
Schmitt, O., Eipert, P., Maestro, R. T., Bellmann, M., Haase, S., Morawska, P., & Prathapan, V. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106943
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sinke, M. R. T., Otte, W. M., Christiaens, D., Schmitt, O., Leemans, A., van der Toorn, A., Sarabdjitsingh, R. A., Joëls, M., & Dijkhuizen, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- King's College London (GB)
- University of Rostock (DE)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Sinke, Michel R. T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Brain Structure and Function
- Published
- 2018-02-20
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2269-2285
- ISSN
- 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
- 1863-2661
- PMC
- PMC5968063
- OpenAlex
- W2792108748
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO-VICI 016.130.662, NWO-VENI 016.168.038)
- Hersenstichting ([F2014(1)-06])
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cortical connectome, diffusion MRI tractography, constrained spherical deconvolution, diffusion tensor imaging, rat brain
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Sensitivity and Specificity, Rats, Wistar, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Rats, Connectome, White Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review