The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memantine Preferentially Blocks Extrasynaptic over Synaptic NMDA Receptor Currents in Hippocampal Autapses
Open accessAbstract
Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain. The NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors (NMDAR) is known to mediate many physiological neural functions. However, excessive activation of NMDARs contributes to neuronal damage in various acute and chronic neurological disorders. To avoid unwanted adverse side effects, blockade of excessive NMDAR activity must therefore be achieved without affecting its physiological function. Memantine, an adamantane derivative, has been used for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease with an excellent clinical safety profile. We previously showed that memantine preferentially blocked neurotoxicity mediated by excessive NMDAR activity while relatively sparing normal neurotransmission, in part because of its uncompetitive antagonism with a fast off-rate. Here, using rat autaptic hippocampal microcultures, we show that memantine at therapeutic concentrations (1–10 μ m) preferentially blocks extrasynaptic rather than synaptic currents mediated by NMDARs in the same neuron. We found that memantine blocks extrasynaptic NMDAR-mediated currents induced by bath application of 100 μ m NMDA/10 μ m glycine with a twofold higher potency than its blockade of the NMDAR component of evoked EPSCs (EPSCs NMDAR); this effect persists under conditions of pathological depolarization in the presence of 1 m m extracellular Mg 2+. Thus, our findings provide the first unequivocal evidence to explain the tolerability of memantine based on differential extrasynaptic/synaptic receptor blockade. At therapeutic concentrations, memantine effectively blocks excessive extrasynaptic NMDAR-mediated currents, while relatively sparing normal synaptic activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system
CHOI, D. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90162-6 · Cited by 7,972
Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones
Nowak, L., Bregestovski, P., Ascher, P., Herbet, A., & Prochiantz, A. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/307462a0 · Cited by 4,043
Glutamate receptor ion channels
Mayer, M. L. (2005) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.05.004 · Cited by 3,640
The Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels
Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D., & Traynelis, S. F. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01394-2 · Cited by 3,554
Voltage-dependent block by Mg2+ of NMDA responses in spinal cord neurones
Mayer, M. L., Westbrook, G. L., & Guthrie, P. B. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/309261a0 · Cited by 2,893
Excitatory Amino Acids as a Final Common Pathway for Neurologic Disorders
Epstein, F. H., Lipton, S. A., & Rosenberg, P. A. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199403033300907 · Cited by 2,658
Self-citationGlutamate and the pathophysiology of hypoxic–ischemic brain damage
Rothman, S. M., & Olney, J. W. (1986) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410190202 · Cited by 2,428
Memantine in Moderate-to-Severe Alzheimer's Disease
Reisberg, B., Doody, R., Stöffler, A., Schmitt, F., Ferris, S., & Möbius, H. J. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa013128 · Cited by 2,043
Extrasynaptic NMDARs oppose synaptic NMDARs by triggering CREB shut-off and cell death pathways
Hardingham, G. E., Fukunaga, Y., & Bading, H. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn835 · Cited by 1,686
Tariot, P. N., Farlow, M. R., Grossberg, G. T., Graham, S. M., McDonald, S., Gergel, I., & for the Memantine Study Group (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.3.317 · Cited by 1,403
Cited by
NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease
Paoletti, P., Bellone, C., & Zhou, Q. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3504 · Cited by 2,523
Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders
Hardingham, G. E., & Bading, H. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2911 · Cited by 1,644
Excitotoxicity and stroke: Identifying novel targets for neuroprotection
Lai, T. W., Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. T. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.006 · Cited by 1,106
Aβ induces astrocytic glutamate release, extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activation, and synaptic loss
Talantova, M., Sanz-Blasco, S., Zhang, X., Xia, P., Akhtar, M. W., Okamoto, S.-I., Dziewczapolski, G., Nakamura, T., Cao, G., Pratt, A. E., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1306832110 · Cited by 600
Self-citationExtrasynaptic NMDA Receptor Involvement in Central Nervous System Disorders
Parsons, M. P., & Raymond, L. A. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.030 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, P., Chen, H.-S. V., Zhang, D., & Lipton, S. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-08-18
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 11246-11250
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2033283296
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 10.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memantine Preferentially Blocks Extrasynaptic over Synaptic NMDA Receptor Currents in Hippocampal Autapses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2488-10.2010
- The paper
- Xia, P., Chen, H.-S. V., Zhang, D., & Lipton, S. A. (2010). Memantine Preferentially Blocks Extrasynaptic over Synaptic NMDA Receptor Currents in Hippocampal Autapses. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2488-10.2010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.