The Puzzle of Visual Development: Behavior and Neural Limits
Open accessAbstract
The development of visual function takes place over many months or years in primate infants. Visual sensitivity is very poor near birth and improves over different times courses for different visual functions. The neural mechanisms that underlie these processes are not well understood despite many decades of research. The puzzle arises because research into the factors that limit visual function in infants has found surprisingly mature neural organization and adult-like receptive field properties in very young infants. The high degree of visual plasticity that has been documented during the sensitive period in young children and animals leaves the brain vulnerable to abnormal visual experience. Abnormal visual experience during the sensitive period can lead to amblyopia, a developmental disorder of vision affecting ∼3% of children. This review provides a historical perspective on research into visual development and the disorder amblyopia. The mismatch between the status of the primary visual cortex and visual behavior, both during visual development and in amblyopia, is discussed, and several potential resolutions are considered. It seems likely that extrastriate visual areas further along the visual pathways may set important limits on visual function and show greater vulnerability to abnormal visual experience. Analyses based on multiunit, population activity may provide useful representations of the information being fed forward from primary visual cortex to extrastriate processing areas and to the motor output.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A neonate's consciously perceived face is poorly resolved because vision develops incrementally after birth, indicating one or more processing steps operate less than optimally.
“I portray the image as poorly resolved because for our species vision develops incrementally after birth (Colombo, 2001), an indication that one or more steps in the processing sequence are operating in a less than optimal way (Kiorpes, 2016).”
From The function(s) of consciousness revisited: insights from a modular/constitutive model using vision as a test case (2026) · cites this paper as Kiorpes, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 122 · Cited by 112
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bell AH, Pasternak T, Ungerleider LG (2014) Ventral and dorsal processing streams. In: The new visual neurosciences (Werner J, Chalupa L, eds), pp 227-242. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Coleman JE, Heynen AJ, Bear MF (2013) The molecular and structural basis of amblyopia. In: The new visual neurosciences (Werner J, Chalupa L, eds), pp 1433-1444. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Kiorpes L, Movshon JA (2014) Neural limitations on visual development in primates: beyond striate cortex. In: The new visual neurosciences (Wer- ner J, Chalupa L, eds), pp 1423-1431. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Movshon JA, Kiorpes L (1990) The role of experience in visual develop- ment. In: Development of sensory systems in mammals (Coleman JR, ed), pp 155-202. New York: Wiley.
- Nagakura I, Mellios N, Sur M (2014) Mechanisms of visual cortex plasticity during development. In: The new visual neurosciences (Werner J, Chal- upa L, eds), pp 1359 -1368. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Authors
- Kiorpes, L.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kiorpes, Lynne
- ORCID
- Kiorpes, Lynne
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2016-11-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 11384-11393
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC5125205
- OpenAlex
- W2555290705
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- York University
- National Institutes of Health (OD010425, EY05864, P51OD010425)
- National Eye Institute (R01EY005864)
- National Center for Research Resources
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- visual development, amblyopia, primary visual cortex, receptive fields, visual plasticity, sensitive period, extrastriate visual areas, visual behavior, multi-unit activity, population activity
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Evidence-Based Medicine, Neurogenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review