The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Higher-Order Interactions Characterized in Cortical Activity
Open accessAbstract
In the cortex, the interactions among neurons give rise to transient coherent activity patterns that underlie perception, cognition, and action. Recently, it was actively debated whether the most basic interactions, i.e., the pairwise correlations between neurons or groups of neurons, suffice to explain those observed activity patterns. So far, the evidence reported is controversial. Importantly, the overall organization of neuronal interactions and the mechanisms underlying their generation, especially those of high-order interactions, have remained elusive. Here we show that higher-order interactions are required to properly account for cortical dynamics such as ongoing neuronal avalanches in the alert monkey and evoked visual responses in the anesthetized cat. A Gaussian interaction model that utilizes the observed pairwise correlations and event rates and that applies intrinsic thresholding identifies those higher-order interactions correctly, both in cortical local field potentials and spiking activities. This allows for accurate prediction of large neuronal population activities as required, e.g., in brain–machine interface paradigms. Our results demonstrate that higher-order interactions are inherent properties of cortical dynamics and suggest a simple solution to overcome the apparent formidable complexity previously thought to be intrinsic to those interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality
Kinouchi, O., & Copelli, M. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys289 · Cited by 831
Episodic multiregional cortical coherence at multiple frequencies during visual task performance
Bressler, S. L., Coppola, R., & Nakamura, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366153a0 · Cited by 533
Cited by
Being Critical of Criticality in the Brain
Beggs, J. M., & Timme, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00163 · Cited by 494
Sampling bias corrections for discrete and Gaussian partial information decompositions
Lorenz, G. M., Engel, N. M., Koçillari, L., Celotto, M., Orsenigo, D., Curreli, S., Malerba, S. B., Engel, A. K., Kayser, C., Fellin, T., et al. (2026) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2026.101619 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, S., Yang, H., Nakahara, H., Santos, G. S., Nikolić, D., & Plenz, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-11-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 17514-17526
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2094542709
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Higher-Order Interactions Characterized in Cortical Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.3127-11.2011
- The paper
- Yu, S., Yang, H., Nakahara, H., Santos, G. S., Nikolić, D., & Plenz, D. (2011). Higher-Order Interactions Characterized in Cortical Activity. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3127-11.2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.