Cited by 831Neural dynamics and brain functionNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationTheoretical and Computational Physics

Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality

Open access
Kinouchi, Osame, Copelli, Mauro·2006·Nature Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys289

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural activity often exhibits multimodal distributions, reflecting transitions between distinct dynamical states rather than continuous fluctuations around a single equilibrium.

    “Neural activity often exhibits multimodal distributions, reflecting transitions between distinct dynamical states rather than continuous fluctuations around a single equilibrium (Deco et al. 2011; Freyer et al. 2009; Kinouchi and Copelli 2006).”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Kinouchi and Copelli 2006

    The passage on p. 2 describes a non-equilibrium phase transition in a model of excitable networks, and another p. 2 passage describes distributions of branching ratios, extinction times, and avalanche sizes. None addresses whether neural activity often has multimodal distributions or whether such distributions reflect switching between dynamical states rather than fluctuations around one equilibrium (searched for multimodal and bimodal activity distributions and state transitions). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]H. U. Fried, S. H. Fuss, and S. I. Korsching, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 , 3222 (2002).
  2. [30]S. Camalet, T. Duke, F. J¨ ullicher, J. Prost, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 , 3183 (2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinouchi, O., & Copelli, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
Corresponding author
Kinouchi, Osame
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2006-04-23
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
348-351
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W1992421401
Cited by
831
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 39
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
excitable networks, criticality, dynamic range, nonequilibrium phase transitions, gap junctions, electrical coupling, olfactory glomeruli, retinal ganglion cells, synchronization, global oscillations, information encoding, psychophysical laws, neural coding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review