Cited by 86Memory and Neural MechanismsSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Methodological Considerations on the Use of Template Matching to Study Long-Lasting Memory Trace Replay

Open access
Tatsuno, Masami, Lipa, Peter, McNaughton, Bruce L.·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Replay of behaviorally induced neural activity patterns during subsequent sleep has been suggested to play an important role in memory consolidation. Many previous studies, mostly involving familiar experiences, suggest that such reactivation occurs, but decays quickly (∼1 h). Recently, however, long-lasting (up to ∼48 h) “reverberation” of neural activity patterns induced by a novel experience was reported on the basis of a template-matching analysis. Because detection and quantification of memory-trace replay depends critically on analysis methods, we investigated the statistical properties of the template-matching method and analyzed rodent neural ensemble activity patterns after a novel experience. For comparison, we also analyzed the same data with an independent analysis technique, the explained variance method. Contrary to the recent report, we did not observe significant long-lasting reverberation using either the template matching or the explained variance approaches. The latter, however, did reveal short-lasting reactivation in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. In addition, detailed analysis of the template-matching method shows that, in the present study, coarse mean firing rate differences among neurons, but not fine temporal spike structures, dominate the results of template matching. Most importantly, it is also demonstrated that partial comparisons of template-matching correlations, such as used in the recent paper, may lead to erroneous conclusions. These investigations indicate that the outcome of template-matching analysis is very sensitive to the conditions of how it is applied, and should be interpreted cautiously, and that the existence of long-lasting reverberation after a novel experience requires additional verification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3317-06.2006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reactivations could last for more than 24 h.

    “Reactivations could last for more than 24 h, although in the earlier of these studies the data analysis was criticized on methodological grounds (1180).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1180]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 86

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O'Reilly RC (1995) Why there are com- plementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev 102:419 -457.

Authors
Tatsuno, M., Lipa, P., & McNaughton, B. L.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-10-18
Volume
26
Issue
42
Pages
10727-10742
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2165088448
Cited by
86
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH046823, MH 46823, R37MH046823)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
template matching, explained variance, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, reverberation, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, novel experience
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Electrophysiology, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Rats, Inbred BN, Rats, Inbred F344, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review