Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic Analysis Reveals that Amyloid Precursor Protein and Death Receptor 6 Function in the Same Pathway to Control Axonal Pruning Independent of β-Secretase

Olsen, Olav, Kallop, Dara Y., McLaughlin, Todd, Huntwork-Rodriguez, Sarah, Wu, Zhuhao, Duggan, Cynthia D., Simon, David J., Lu, Yanmei, Easley-Neal, Courtney, Takeda, Kentaro, Hass, Philip E., Jaworski, Alexander, O'Leary, Dennis D.M., Weimer, Robby M, Tessier-Lavigne, Marc·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In the developing brain, initial neuronal projections are formed through extensive growth and branching of developing axons, but many branches are later pruned to sculpt the mature pattern of connections. Despite its widespread occurrence, the mechanisms controlling pruning remain incompletely characterized. Based on pharmacological and biochemical analysis in vitro and initial genetic analysis in vivo, prior studies implicated a pathway involving binding of the Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) to Death Receptor 6 (DR6) and activation of a downstream caspase cascade in axonal pruning. Here, we further test their involvement in pruning in vivo and their mechanism of action through extensive genetic and biochemical analysis. Genetic deletion of DR6 was previously shown to impair pruning of retinal axons in vivo. We show that genetic deletion of APP similarly impairs pruning of retinal axons in vivo and provide evidence that APP and DR6 act cell autonomously and in the same pathway to control pruning. Prior analysis had suggested that β-secretase cleavage of APP and binding of an N-terminal fragment of APP to DR6 is required for their actions, but further genetic and biochemical analysis reveals that β-secretase activity is not required and that high-affinity binding to DR6 requires a more C-terminal portion of the APP ectodomain. These results provide direct support for the model that APP and DR6 function cell autonomously and in the same pathway to control pruning in vivo and raise the possibility of alternate mechanisms for how APP and DR6 control pruning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3522-13.2014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2039-12.2012 · DOI
  2. 10.1186/1471-213X-7-103 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040370 · DOI
  4. 10.1074/jbc.M111.315051 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008477 · DOI
  6. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4963-13.2014 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135632 · DOI
  8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2398-13.2013 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature07767 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1083/jcb.201305037 · DOI
  11. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0922-10.2010 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11010-008-9966-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nbt1037 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3012-12.2012 · DOI
  15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2939-10.2010 · DOI
  16. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4660-04.2005 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Olsen, O., Kallop, D. Y., McLaughlin, T., Huntwork-Rodriguez, S., Wu, Z., Duggan, C. D., Simon, D. J., Lu, Y., Easley-Neal, C., Takeda, K., Hass, P. E., Jaworski, A., O'Leary, D. D. M., Weimer, R. M., & Tessier-Lavigne, M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-05-07
Volume
34
Issue
19
Pages
6438-6447
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
64
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review