Cited by 179Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

Training-induced changes in inhibitory control network activity.

Open access
Berkman, Elliot T., Kahn, Lauren E., Merchant, Junaid S.·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Despite extensive research on inhibitory control (IC) and its neural systems, the questions of whether IC can be improved with training and how the associated neural systems change are understudied. Behavioral evidence suggests that performance on IC tasks improves with training but that these gains do not transfer to other tasks, and almost nothing is known about how activation in IC-related brain regions changes with training. Human participants were randomly assigned to receive IC training (N = 30) on an adaptive version of the stop-signal task (SST) or an active sham-training (N = 30) during 10 sessions across 3 weeks. Neural activation during the SST before and after training was assessed in both groups using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performance on the SST improved significantly more in the training group than in the control group. The pattern of neuroimaging results was consistent with a proactive control model such that activity in key parts of the IC network shifted earlier in time within the trial, becoming associated with cues that anticipated the upcoming need for IC. Specifically, activity in the inferior frontal gyrus decreased during the implementation of control (i.e., stopping) and increased during cues that preceded the implementation of IC from pretraining to post-training. Also, steeper behavioral improvement in the training group correlated with activation increases during the cue phase and decreases during implementation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These results are the first to uncover the neural pathways for training-related improvements in IC and can explain previous null findings of IC training transfer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3564-13.2014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have failed to find behavioral transfer effects after training IC, while others have found positive near and far transfer effects after task-switching training across the lifespan of healthy individuals.

    “Although several of these studies have failed to find behavioral transfer effects after training IC (Thorell et al., 2009; Berkman et al., 2014; Enge et al., 2014), others have found positive near and far transfer effects after task-switching training across the lifespan of healthy individuals (Karbach and Kray, 2009)”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Berkman et al., 2014

  • Adaptive training in conflict resolution tasks improves performance in other tasks also thought to require conflict resolution mechanisms.

    “indicating that adaptive training in conflict resolution tasks improves performance in other tasks also thought to require conflict resolution mechanisms”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Berkman et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 179

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cohen JR, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD (2013) Intentional and incidental self-control in ventrolateral PFC. In: Principles of frontal lobe function, 2nd ed (Stuss DT, Knight RT, eds), pp. 417-440. New York: Oxford UP.

Authors
Berkman, E. T., Kahn, L. E., & Merchant, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-12-31
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
149-157
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2016454981
Cited by
179
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Oregon
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
inhibitory control, stop-signal task, inferior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, transfer of training, cognitive training
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Inhibition, Psychomotor Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review