Mapping Longitudinal Development of Local Cortical Gyrification in Infants from Birth to 2 Years of Age
Open accessAbstract
Human cortical folding is believed to correlate with cognitive functions. This likely correlation may have something to do with why abnormalities of cortical folding have been found in many neurodevelopmental disorders. However, little is known about how cortical gyrification, the cortical folding process, develops in the first 2 years of life, a period of dynamic and regionally heterogeneous cortex growth. In this article, we show how we developed a novel infant-specific method for mapping longitudinal development of local cortical gyrification in infants. By using this method, via 219 longitudinal 3T magnetic resonance imaging scans from 73 healthy infants, we systemically and quantitatively characterized for the first time the longitudinal cortical global gyrification index (GI) and local GI (LGI) development in the first 2 years of life. We found that the cortical GI had age-related and marked development, with 16.1% increase in the first year and 6.6% increase in the second year. We also found marked and regionally heterogeneous cortical LGI development in the first 2 years of life, with the high-growth regions located in the association cortex, whereas the low-growth regions located in sensorimotor, auditory, and visual cortices. Meanwhile, we also showed that LGI growth in most cortical regions was positively correlated with the brain volume growth, which is particularly significant in the prefrontal cortex in the first year. In addition, we observed gender differences in both cortical GIs and LGIs in the first 2 years, with the males having larger GIs than females at 2 years of age. This study provides valuable information on normal cortical folding development in infancy and early childhood.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A larger-sample study replicated increased medial temporal cortex in male neonates.
“A more recent study with a larger sample size and more stringent statistical thresholds replicated the finding of increased medial temporal cortex in males”
From Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood (2018) · cites this paper as [124]
Female neonates have greater grey-matter volumes around the temporal-parietal junction.
“female neonates have greater grey-matter volumes around the temporal-parietal junction, a crucial brain region for social cognition124.”
From Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood (2018) · cites this paper as [124]
There are only marginal associations between parental education and brain volumes at birth.
“only marginal associations between parental education and brain volumes at birth124.”
From Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood (2018) · cites this paper as [124]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 251
- Authors
- Li, G., Wang, L., Shi, F., Lyall, A. E., Lin, W., Gilmore, J. H., & Shen, D.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Korea University (KR)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2014-03-19
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4228-4238
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3960466
- OpenAlex
- W2088198702
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 20.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG042599, R01AG041721, AG041721)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH100217, MH088520, U01MH070890, RC1MH088520, MH064065, R01MH100217, MH070890, P50MH064065, R01MH070890)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS055754, R01NS055754)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB006733, EB009634, R03EB008760, EB008374, R01EB008374, EB008760, R01EB009634, R01EB006733)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD053000, HD053000)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- cortical gyrification, cortical folding, infant brain development, longitudinal development, local gyrification index, prefrontal cortex, association cortex, sex differences, neurodevelopmental disorders
- MeSH terms
- Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Sex Characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review