Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptation of Reward Sensitivity in Orbitofrontal Neurons

Open access
Kobayashi, Shunsuke, Pinto de Carvalho, Ofelia, Schultz, Wolfram·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Animals depend on a large variety of rewards but their brains have a limited dynamic coding range. When rewards are uncertain, neuronal coding needs to cover a wide range of possible rewards. However, when reward is likely to occur within a specific range, focusing the sensitivity on the predicted range would optimize the discrimination of small reward differences. One way to overcome the trade-off between wide coverage and optimal discrimination is to adapt reward sensitivity dynamically to the available rewards. We investigated how changes in reward distribution influenced the coding of reward in the orbitofrontal cortex. Animals performed an oculomotor task in which a fixation cue predicted the SD of the probability distribution of juice volumes, while the expected mean volume was kept constant. A subsequent cue specified the exact juice volume obtained for a correct saccade response. Population responses of orbitofrontal neurons that reflected the predicted juice volume showed adaptation to the reward distribution. Statistical tests on individual responses revealed that a quarter of value-coding neurons shifted the reward sensitivity slope significantly between two reward distributions, whereas the remaining neurons showed insignificant change or lack of adaptation. Adaptations became more prominent when reward distributions changed less frequently, indicating time constraints for assessing reward distributions and adjusting neuronal sensitivity. The observed neuronal adaptation would optimize discrimination and contribute to the efficient coding of a large variety of potential rewards by neurons with limited dynamic range.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4009-09.2010

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Kobayashi, S., Pinto de Carvalho, O., & Schultz, W.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-01-13
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
534-544
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1988547834
Cited by
206
References
7
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation of Reward Sensitivity in Orbitofrontal Neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4009-09.2010
The paper
Kobayashi, S., Pinto de Carvalho, O., & Schultz, W. (2010). Adaptation of Reward Sensitivity in Orbitofrontal Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4009-09.2010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.