The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FoxP2 Expression in Avian Vocal Learners and Non-Learners
Open accessAbstract
Most vertebrates communicate acoustically, but few, among them humans, dolphins and whales, bats, and three orders of birds, learn this trait.FOXP2 is the first gene linked to human speech and has been the target of positive selection during recent primate evolution. To test whether the expression pattern of FOXP2 is consistent with a role in learned vocal communication, we cloned zebra finch FoxP2 and its close relative FoxP1 and compared mRNA and protein distribution in developing and adult brains of a variety of avian vocal learners and non-learners, and a crocodile. We found that the protein sequence of zebra finch FoxP2 is 98% identical with mouse and human FOXP2. In the avian and crocodilian forebrain,FoxP2 was expressed predominantly in the striatum, a basal ganglia brain region affected in patients with FOXP2 mutations. Strikingly, in zebra finches, the striatal nucleus Area X, necessary for vocal learning, expressed more FoxP2 than the surrounding tissue at post-hatch days 35 and 50, when vocal learning occurs. In adult canaries,FoxP2 expression in Area X differed seasonally; more FoxP2 expression was associated with times when song becomes unstable. In adult chickadees, strawberry finches, song sparrows, and Bengalese finches, Area X expressed FoxP2 to different degrees. Non-telencephalic regions in both vocal learning and non-learning birds, and in crocodiles, were less variable in expression and comparable with regions that express FOXP2 in human and rodent brains. We conclude that differential expression of FoxP2 in avian vocal learners might be associated with vocal plasticity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei
Reiner, A., Perkel, D. J., Bruce, L. L., Butler, A. B., Csillag, A., Kuenzel, W., Medina, L., Paxinos, G., Shimizu, T., Striedter, G., et al. (2004) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20118 · Cited by 1,148
Self-citationNottebohm, F., Nottebohm, M. E., & Crane, L. (1986) · Behavioral and Neural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0163-1047(86)90485-1 · Cited by 352
Cited by
Evolution at Two Levels: On Genes and Form
Carroll, S. B. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030245 · Cited by 882
Fitch, W. T. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817779 · Cited by 594
Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds
Pfenning, A. R., Hara, E., Whitney, O., Rivas, M. V., Wang, R., Roulhac, P. L., Howard, J. T., Wirthlin, M., Lovell, P. V., Ganapathy, G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1256846 · Cited by 463
Self-citationHaesler, S., Rochefort, C., Georgi, B., Licznerski, P., Osten, P., & Scharff, C. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050321 · Cited by 364
Self-citationThe evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Haesler, S., Wada, K., Nshdejan, A., Morrisey, E. E., Lints, T., Jarvis, E. D., & Scharff, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-03-31
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3164-3175
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2166648354
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.