The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability
Open accessAbstract
The motor system responds to perturbations with reflexes, such as the vestibulo-ocular reflex or stretch reflex, whose gains adapt in response to novel and fixed changes in the environment, such as magnifying spectacles or standing on a tilting platform. Here we demonstrate a reflex response to shifts in the hand's visual location during reaching, which occurs before the onset of voluntary reaction time, and investigate how its magnitude depends on statistical properties of the environment. We examine the change in reflex response to two different distributions of visuomotor discrepancies, both of which have zero mean and equal variance across trials. Critically one distribution is task relevant and the other task irrelevant. The task-relevant discrepancies are maintained to the end of the movement, whereas the task-irrelevant discrepancies are transient such that no discrepancy exists at the end of the movement. The reflex magnitude was assessed using identical probe trials under both distributions. We find opposite directions of adaptation of the reflex response under these two distributions, with increased reflex magnitudes for task-relevant variability and decreased reflex magnitudes for task-irrelevant variability. This demonstrates modulation of reflex magnitudes in the absence of a fixed change in the environment, and shows that reflexes are sensitive to the statistics of tasks with modulation depending on whether the variability is task relevant or task irrelevant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination
Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn963 · Cited by 3,081
Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention
Yu, A. J., & Dayan, P. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.026 · Cited by 1,774 · cited 1×
“For example, it has been suggested that the CNS has different mechanism for determining expected and unexpected uncertainty (Yu and Dayan, 2005).”
Optimality principles in sensorimotor control
Todorov, E. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1309 · Cited by 1,746
Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control
Liu, D., & Todorov, E. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1110-06.2007 · Cited by 447
Cited by
The computational and neural basis of voluntary motor control and planning
Scott, S. H. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.008 · Cited by 317
Independence of Movement Preparation and Movement Initiation
Haith, A. M., Pakpoor, J., & Krakauer, J. W. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3245-15.2016 · Cited by 225
Parallel specification of competing sensorimotor control policies for alternative action options
Gallivan, J. P., Logan, L., Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4214 · Cited by 124
Self-citationDynamic multisensory integration: somatosensory speed trumps visual accuracy during feedback control
Crevecoeur, F., Munoz, D. P., & Scott, S. H. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0184-16.2016 · Cited by 114
Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching
Zimmet, A. M., Cao, D., Bastian, A. J., & Cowan, N. J. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53246 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Franklin, D. W., & Wolpert, D. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-12-24
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 14165-14175
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2053271386
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4406-08.2008
- The paper
- Franklin, D. W., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008). Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4406-08.2008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.