Cited by 82Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyCongenital heart defects research

Fgfr1 Is Required for Cortical Regeneration and Repair after Perinatal Hypoxia

Open access
Fagel, Devon M., Ganat, Yosif, Cheng, Elise, Silbereis, John, Ohkubo, Yasushi, Ment, Laura R., Vaccarino, Flora M.·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Chronic postnatal hypoxia causes an apparent loss of cortical neurons that is reversed during recovery (Fagel et al., 2006). The cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying this plasticity are not understood. Here, we show that chronic hypoxia from postnatal days 3 (P3) to 10 causes a 30% decrease in cortical neurons and a 24% decrease in cortical volume. T-brain-1 (Tbr1)+and SMI-32+excitatory neuron numbers were completely recovered 1 month after the insult, but the mice showed a residual deficit in Parvalbumin+and Calretinin+GABAergic interneurons. In contrast, hypoxic mice carrying a disrupted fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (Fgfr1) gene in GFAP+ cells [Fgfr1 conditional knock-out (cKO)], demonstrated a persistent loss of excitatory cortical neurons and a worsening of the interneuron defect. Labeling proliferating progenitors at P17 revealed increased generation of cortical NeuN+and Tbr1+excitatory neurons in wild-type mice subjected to hypoxic insult, whereas Fgfr1 cKO failed to mount a cortical neurogenetic response. Hypoxic wild-type mice also demonstrated a twofold increase in cell proliferation in the subventricular zone (SVZ) at P17 and a threefold increase in neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb (OB) at P48, compared with normoxic mice. In contrast,Fgfr1 cKO mice had decreased SVZ cell proliferation and curtailed reactive neurogenesis in the OB. Thus, the activation of FGFR-1 in GFAP+ cells is required for neuronal recovery after neonatal hypoxic injury, which is attributable in part to enhanced cortical and OB neurogenesis. In contrast, there is incomplete recovery of inhibitory neurons after injury, which may account for persistent behavioral deficits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4516-08.2009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple fetuses per pregnancy, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), X-ray, UV, nuclear or cosmic radiation, (ultra)sound as well as high temperature, preterm birth or hypoxia whether or not by traumatic causes can pose serious threats to proper corticogenesis.

    “Multiple fetuses per pregnancy, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR, due to placental failure other than by causes described above), X-ray, UV, nuclear or cosmic radiation, (ultra)sound as well as high temperature, preterm birth or hypoxia whether or not by traumatic causes can pose serious threats to proper corticogenesis as well [349–356].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [351]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says oxygen deprivation causes neurodevelopmental impairment and cortical tissue loss in premature children. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports cortical neuron loss after neonatal hypoxia in mice. The paper does not support the sentence’s other proposed threats, including multiple fetuses, IUGR, radiation, (ultra)sound, or high temperature, nor does it distinguish traumatic from nontraumatic hypoxia. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 82

Authors
Fagel, D. M., Ganat, Y., Cheng, E., Silbereis, J., Ohkubo, Y., Ment, L. R., & Vaccarino, F. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Vaccarino, Flora M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-01-28
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
1202-1211
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2089156150
Cited by
82
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS062686, R01NS060750, P01NS035476, P01-NS 35476)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
FGFR1, perinatal hypoxia, neuronal loss, GABAergic interneurons, excitatory neurons, neurogenesis, subventricular zone, olfactory bulb, conditional knockout, cortical plasticity
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Hypoxia, Bromodeoxyuridine, Cerebral Cortex, Creatinine, DNA-Binding Proteins, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Regeneration, Neurons, Olfactory Bulb, Parvalbumins, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, T-Box Domain Proteins, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review