Inhibition Determines Membrane Potential Dynamics and Controls Action Potential Generation in Awake and Sleeping Cat Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Intracellular recordings of cortical neurons in awake cat and monkey show a depolarized state, sustained firing, and intense subthreshold synaptic activity. It is not known what conductance dynamics underlie such activity and how neurons process information in such highly stochastic states. Here, we combine intracellular recordings in awake and naturally sleeping cats with computational models to investigate subthreshold dynamics of conductances and how conductance dynamics determine spiking activity. We show that during both wakefulness and the “up-states” of natural slow-wave sleep, membrane-potential activity stems from a diversity of combinations of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductances, with dominant inhibition in most of the cases. Inhibition also provides the largest contribution to membrane potential fluctuations. Computational models predict that in such inhibition-dominant states, spikes are preferentially evoked by a drop of inhibitory conductance, and that its signature is a transient drop of membrane conductance before the spike. This pattern of conductance change is indeed observed in estimates of spike-triggered averages of synaptic conductances during wakefulness and slow-wave sleep up states. These results show that activated states are defined by diverse combinations of excitatory and inhibitory conductances with pronounced inhibition, and that the dynamics of inhibition is particularly effective on spiking, suggesting an important role for inhibitory processes in both conscious and unconscious cortical states.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The up-state reflects some balance between excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity, whereas the hyperpolarizing down-state represents a period of disfacilitation that does not contain active inhibition.
“Whereas the up-state reflects some balance between excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity (505, 1017, 1074), the hyperpolarizing down-state represents a period of disfacilitation that does not contain active inhibition (229,1146).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1017]
The Conductance time course during up- and down-state transitions section reports that excitation drives the onset of an up-state and that inhibition drops before an up-to-down transition in one cell. These findings are consistent with reduced synaptic activity around the down-state, but the analysis measures changes relative to the down-state, not to rest; it does not establish that the down-state contains no active inhibition. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 247
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Destexhe A, Timofeev I, Rudolph M (2005) Combining stochastic models with intracellular recordings reveals dominant inhibitory conductances in cortical neurons of awake and naturally-sleeping animals. Paper pre- sented at COSYNE Conference, Salt Lake City, March.
- Authors
- Rudolph, M., Pospischil, M., Timofeev, I., & Destexhe, A.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université Laval (CA)
- ORCID
- Timofeev, Igor
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-05-16
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5280-5290
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6672346
- OpenAlex
- W2072150567
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- cortical inhibition, membrane potential dynamics, action potential generation, slow-wave sleep, wakefulness, spike-triggered averaging, excitation-inhibition balance, cat cortex, neuron modeling
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cats, Cerebral Cortex, Membrane Potentials, Neural Inhibition, Sleep, Wakefulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review