The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceptual Relearning of Complex Visual Motion after V1 Damage in Humans
Open accessAbstract
Damage to the adult, primary visual cortex (V1) causes severe visual impairment that was previously thought to be permanent, yet several visual pathways survive V1 damage, mediating residual, often unconscious functions known as “blindsight.” Because some of these pathways normally mediate complex visual motion perception, we asked whether specific training in the blind field could improve not just simple but also complex visual motion discriminations in humans with long-standing V1 damage. Global direction discrimination training was administered to the blind field of five adults with unilateral cortical blindness. Training returned direction integration thresholds to normal at the trained locations. Although retinotopically localized to trained locations, training effects transferred to multiple stimulus and task conditions, improving the detection of luminance increments, contrast sensitivity for drifting gratings, and the extraction of motion signal from noise. Thus, perceptual relearning of complex visual motion processing is possible without an intact V1 but only when specific training is administered in the blind field. These findings indicate a much greater capacity for adult visual plasticity after V1 damage than previously thought. Most likely, basic mechanisms of visual learning must operate quite effectively in extrastriate visual cortex, providing new hope and direction for the development of principled rehabilitation strategies to treat visual deficits resulting from permanent visual cortical damage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Newsome, W., & Pare, E. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-06-02201.1988 · Cited by 1,615
VISUAL CAPACITY IN THE HEMIANOPIC FIELD FOLLOWING A RESTRICTED OCCIPITAL ABLATION
WEISKRANTZ, L., WARRINGTON, E. K., SANDERS, M. D., & MARSHALL, J. (1974) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/97.1.709 · Cited by 1,465
A Specific and Enduring Improvement in Visual Motion Discrimination
Ball, K., & Sekuler, R. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7134968 · Cited by 383
Learning to see: experience and attention in primary visual cortex
Crist, R. E., Li, W., & Gilbert, C. D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/87470 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Cowey, A. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1914-2 · Cited by 279
Digital Therapeutics: Emerging New Therapy for Neurologic Deficits after Stroke
Choi, M. J., Kim, H., Nah, H.-W., & Kang, D.-W. (2019) · Journal of Stroke · doi:10.5853/jos.2019.01963 · Cited by 63
“The study demonstrated that a thorough localized training with a direction integration task can improve the blind field vision of patients with cortical blindness (CB).(81,82) A VPL training program developed by Nunaps Inc.”
BackgroundAn investigation of far and near transfer in a gamified visual learning paradigm
Duyck, S., & Op de Beeck, H. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227000 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Huxlin, K. R., Martin, T., Kelly, K., Riley, M., Friedman, D. I., Burgin, W. S., & Hayhoe, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3981-3991
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2097527858
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptual Relearning of Complex Visual Motion after V1 Damage in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4882-08.2009
- The paper
- Huxlin, K. R., Martin, T., Kelly, K., Riley, M., Friedman, D. I., Burgin, W. S., & Hayhoe, M. (2009). Perceptual Relearning of Complex Visual Motion after V1 Damage in Humans. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4882-08.2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.