Cited by 1,615Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationMultisensory perception and integration

A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT)

Open access
Newsome, WT, Pare, EB·1988·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Physiological experiments indicate that the middle temporal visual area (MT) of primates plays a prominent role in the cortical analysis of visual motion. We investigated the role of MT in visual perception by examining the effect of chemical lesions of MT on psychophysical thresholds. We trained rhesus monkeys on psychophysical tasks that enabled us to assess their sensitivity to motion and to contrast. For motion psychophysics, we employed a dynamic random dot display that permitted us to vary the intensity of a motion signal in the midst of masking motion noise. We measured the threshold intensity for which the monkey could successfully complete a direction discrimination. In the contrast task, we measured the threshold contrast for which the monkeys could successfully discriminate the orientation of stationary gratings. Injections of ibotenic acid into MT caused striking elevations in motion thresholds, but had little or no effect on contrast thresholds. The results indicate that neural activity in MT contributes selectively to the perception of motion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.08-06-02201.1988

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurons in extrastriate cortex (areas MT and MST) carry critical sensory information about motion direction.

    “A combination of recording, lesion, and stimulation studies has established that neurons in extrastriate cortex (areas MT and MST) carry critical sensory information about motion direction (Newsome and Pare, 1988;Salzman et al., 1990;1992;Britten et al., 1992;Celebrini and Newsome, 1994;1995).”

    From Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task (2002) · cites this paper as Newsome and Pare, 1988

    The paper’s MT and motion processing section reports that MT lesions impair motion perception, supporting a critical role for MT. It also describes MST as containing many directionally selective neurons, but does not establish that MST carries information critical to motion-direction perception. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MT provides at least some of the motion information used to form the direction decision.

    “Thus, MT provides at least some of the motion information used to form the direction decision.”
  • MT has an established role in task performance.

    “the established role of MT in task performance16–19”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Van Essen, D. C. (1985) Functional organization of primate visual cortex. In Cerebral Cortex, A. Peters and E. G. Jones, eds., pp. 259- 329, Plenum, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newsome, W., & Pare, E.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1988-06-01
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
2201-2211
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2148916325
Cited by
1,615
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 56
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY005603, R01-EY05603)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
middle temporal area, MT, motion perception, visual motion, chemical lesions, ibotenic acid, psychophysical thresholds, motion direction discrimination, contrast sensitivity, rhesus monkeys, cortical visual processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Macaca mulatta, Motion Perception, Perceptual Disorders, Psychophysics, Reference Values, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review