The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical State Determines Global Variability and Correlations in Visual Cortex
Open accessAbstract
The response of neurons in sensory cortex to repeated stimulus presentations is highly variable. To investigate the nature of this variability, we compared the spike activity of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of cats with that of their afferents from lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), in response to similar stimuli. We found variability to be much higher in V1 than in LGN. To investigate the sources of the additional variability, we measured the spiking activity of large V1 populations and found that much of the variability was shared across neurons: the variable portion of the responses of one neuron could be well predicted from the summed activity of the rest of the neurons. Variability thus mostly reflected global fluctuations affecting all neurons. The size and prevalence of these fluctuations, both in responses to stimuli and in ongoing activity, depended on cortical state, being larger in synchronized states than in more desynchronized states. Contrary to previous reports, these fluctuations invested the overall population, regardless of preferred orientation. The global fluctuations substantially increased variability in single neurons and correlations among pairs of neurons. Once this effect was removed, pairwise correlations were reduced and were similar regardless of cortical state. These results highlight the importance of cortical state in controlling cortical operation and can help reconcile previous studies, which differed widely in their estimate of neuronal variability and pairwise correlations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These variations in state exert an effect on sensory evoked neural activity that can be as significant as variations in the sensory stimulus itself”
From Waking state: rapid variations modulate neural and behavioral responses (2015) · cites this paper as Scholvinck et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-10-03870.1998 · Cited by 2,178
Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons
Mainen, Z. F., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7770778 · Cited by 1,950
Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses
Arieli, A., Sterkin, A., Grinvald, A., & Aertsen, A. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5283.1868 · Cited by 1,660
Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population
Pillow, J. W., Shlens, J., Paninski, L., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Chichilnisky, E. J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07140 · Cited by 1,332
Grouping of brain rhythms in corticothalamic systems
Steriade, M. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.029 · Cited by 1,296
Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations
Cohen, M. R., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2439 · Cited by 1,163
The Asynchronous State in Cortical Circuits
Renart, A., de la Rocha, J., Bartho, P., Hollender, L., Parga, N., Reyes, A., & Harris, K. D. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179850 · Cited by 1,106
Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations
Cohen, M. R., & Kohn, A. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2842 · Cited by 1,059
The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex
Tolhurst, D. J., Movshon, J. A., & Dean, A. F. (1983) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(83)90200-6 · Cited by 1,002
Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes
Kenet, T., Bibitchkov, D., Tsodyks, M., Grinvald, A., & Arieli, A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02078 · Cited by 924
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–198 of 198
Bridging the gap between single receptor type activity and whole‐brain dynamics
Jancke, D., Herlitze, S., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G. (2021) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.15855 · Cited by 17
Panzeri, S., Safaai, H., Feo, V. D., & Vato, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00165 · Cited by 14
Circuit models of low dimensional shared variability in cortical networksPreprint
Huang, C., Ruff, D. A., Pyle, R., Rosenbaum, R., Cohen, M. R., & Doiron, B. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/217976 · Cited by 15
Milliseconds of Sensory Input Abruptly Modulate the Dynamics of Cortical States for Seconds
Deneux, T., & Grinvald, A. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw259 · Cited by 15
Between-area communication through the lens of within-area neuronal dynamics
Gozel, O., & Doiron, B. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adl6120 · Cited by 14
Klaver, L. M. F., Brinkhof, L. P., Sikkens, T., Casado-Román, L., Williams, A. G., Mourik-Donga, L. A. V., Mejías, J. F., Pennartz, C. M. A., & Bosman, C. A. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad061 · Cited by 14
Lower neuronal variability in the monkey dorsolateral prefrontal than posterior parietal cortex
Qi, X.-L., & Constantinidis, C. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00454.2015 · Cited by 14
Dynamics and sources of response variability and its coordination in visual cortex
Hoseini, M. S., Wright, N. C., Xià, J., Clawson, W. P., Shew, W. L., & Weßel, R. (2019) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523819000117 · Cited by 12
Stimulus-dependent relationships between behavioral choice and sensory neural responses
Chicharro, D., Panzeri, S., & Haefner, R. M. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54858 · Cited by 13
Sleep-like changes in neural processing emerge during sleep deprivation in early auditory cortex
Marmelshtein, A., Eckerling, A., Hadad, B., Ben‐Eliyahu, S., & Nir, Y. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.022 · Cited by 15
Adaptation modulates correlated subthreshold response variability in visual cortex
Wright, N. C., Hoseini, M. S., & Weßel, R. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00124.2017 · Cited by 13
Representation of foreseeable choice outcomes in orbitofrontal cortex triplet-wise interactions
Balaguer‐Ballester, E., Nogueira, R., Abofalia, J. M., Moreno‐Bote, R., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007862 · Cited by 14
Stimulus-dependent spiking relationships with the EEG
Snyder, A. C., & Smith, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00427.2015 · Cited by 13
Relating the Structure of Noise Correlations in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex to Decoder Performance
Mendels, O. P., & Shamir, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2018.00012 · Cited by 11
Isbister, J. B., Reyes‐Puerta, V., Sun, J., Horenko, I., & Luhmann, H. J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94002-0 · Cited by 11
Stimulus presentation can enhance spiking irregularity across subcortical and cortical regions
Fayaz, S., Fakharian, M. A., & Ghazizadeh, A. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010256 · Cited by 10
Coupled variability in primary sensory areas and the hippocampus during spontaneous activity
de Vasconcelos, N. A. P., Soares‐Cunha, C., Rodrigues, A. J., Ribeiro, S. T. G., & Sousa, N. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46077 · Cited by 12
Whiteway, M. R., Socha, K. Z., Bonin, V., & Butts, D. A. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/407858 · Cited by 12
Waschke, L., Tune, S., & Obleser, J. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/582353 · Cited by 12
Garrett, D. D., Kloosterman, N. A., Epp, S. M., Chopurian, V., Kosciessa, J. Q., Waschke, L., Skowron, A., Shine, J. M., Perry, A., Salami, A., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.05.490687 · Cited by 16
In and Out of Criticality? State-Dependent Scaling in the Rat Visual Cortex
Castro, D. M., Feliciano, T., de Vasconcelos, N. A. P., Soares‐Cunha, C., Coimbra, B., Rodrigues, A. J., Carelli, P. V., & Copelli, M. (2024) · PRX Life · doi:10.1103/prxlife.2.023008 · Cited by 11
Ribeiro, M. J., & Castelo-Branco, M. S. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75722 · Cited by 12
Sensory experience selectively reorganizes the late component of evoked responses
Bermudez-Contreras, E. J., Gómez-Palacio-Schjetnan, A., Luczak, A., & Mohajerani, M. H. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac231 · Cited by 10
Ribeiro, T. L., Yu, S. P., Mártin, D. A., Winkowski, D. E., Kanold, P. O., Chialvo, D. R., & Plenz, D. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.01.182014 · Cited by 9
Electrical Signaling Beyond Neurons
Monk, T., Dennler, N., Ralph, N. O., Rastogi, S., Afshar, S., Urbizagastegui, P. A. D. A., Jarvis, R. J., André, V. S., & Adamatzky, A. (2024) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01696 · Cited by 11
Inferring internal states across mice and monkeys using facial features
Tlaie, A., Hay, M. Y. A. E., Mert, B., Taylor, R., Ferracci, P.-A., Shapcott, K. A., Glukhova, M., Pillow, J. W., Havenith, M. N., & Schölvinck, M. L. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60296-1 · Cited by 11
Correlated activity of cortical neurons survives extensive removal of feedforward sensory input
Shapcott, K. A., Schmiedt, J. T., Saunders, R. C., Maier, A., Leopold, D. A., & Schmid, M. C. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34886 · Cited by 10
Thalamus exhibits less sensory variability quenching than cortex
Poland, E., Donner, T. H., Müller, K.-M., Leopold, D. A., & Wilke, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43934-9 · Cited by 11
Hassen, S. B. H., & Hamed, S. B. (2020) · Current Opinion in Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cophys.2020.07.015 · Cited by 10
Internal gain modulations, but not changes in stimulus contrast, preserve the neural code
Lee, S., Park, J., & Smirnakis, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2012-18.2019 · Cited by 10
Locomotion-dependent remapping of distributed cortical networksPreprint
Clancy, K. B., Oršolić, I., & Mrsic‐Flogel, T. D. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/386375 · Cited by 10
Modeling the diverse effects of divisive normalization on noise correlations
Weiss, O., Bounds, H. A., Adesnik, H., & Coen-Cagli, R. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011667 · Cited by 10
Wright, N. C., & Weßel, R. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00340.2017 · Cited by 9
Interpretation of correlated neural variability from models of feed-forward and recurrent circuits
Pernice, V., & da Silveira, R. A. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005979 · Cited by 9
What can neuronal populations tell us about cognition?
Arandia-Romero, I., Nogueira, R., Mochol, G., & Moreno‐Bote, R. (2017) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.07.008 · Cited by 8
Unsupervised approach to decomposing neural tuning variability
Zhu, R., & Wei, X.-X. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37982-z · Cited by 9
Sabri, E., Adibi, M., & Arabzadeh, E. (2016) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2016.00049 · Cited by 9
Correlated variability in primate superior colliculus depends on functional class
Katz, L. N., Yu, G., Herman, J. P., & Krauzlis, R. J. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04912-0 · Cited by 6
When Perception Trumps Reality
Sand, A., & Nilsson, M. E. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616684681 · Cited by 8
Wright, N. C., Hoseini, M. S., Yaşar, T. B., & Weßel, R. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00398.2017 · Cited by 8
Rowland, J. M., van der Plas, T. L., Loidolt, M., Lees, R. M., Keeling, J., Dehning, J., Akam, T. E., Priesemann, V., & Packer, A. M. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.12.28.474343 · Cited by 8
Modulation of the dynamical state in cortical network models
Huang, C. (2021) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2021.07.004 · Cited by 8
Neural Coding of Cell Assemblies via Spike-Timing Self-Information
Li, M., Xie, K., Kuang, H., Liu, J., Wang, D., Fox, G. E., Shi, Z., Chen, L., Fang, Z., Mao, Y. Q., et al. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy081 · Cited by 10
Cortical Variability and Challenges for Modeling Approaches
Balaguer‐Ballester, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2017.00015 · Cited by 8
Propagation of BOLD Activity Reveals Task-dependent Directed Interactions Across Human Visual Cortex
Gravel, N., Renken, R. J., Harvey, B. M., Deco, G., Cornelissen, F. W., & Gilson, M. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa165 · Cited by 7
Inhibitory control of correlated intrinsic variability in cortical networksPreprint
Stringer, C., Pachitariu, M., Okun, M., Barthó, P., Harris, K., Latham, P. E., Sahani, M., & Lesica, N. A. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/041103 · Cited by 7
Reduced alpha amplitudes predict perceptual suppression
Poland, E., Bhonsle, A., Steinmann, I., & Wilke, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92404-8 · Cited by 6
Expansion and State-Dependent Variability along Sensory Processing Streams
Duarte, R. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0874-15.2015 · Cited by 6
Arousal Optimizes Neural Evidence Representation for Human Decision-MakingPreprint
Grueschow, M., Polanía, R., Hare, T. A., & Ruff, C. C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3155606 · Cited by 7
Pilzak, A., Calderini, M., Berberian, N., & Thivierge, J. (2025) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0233158 · Cited by 5
Neuromodulation influences synchronization and intrinsic read-out
Scheler, G. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.15804.1 · Cited by 5
Context flexibly modulates cue representations in visual cortex
Faulkner, A. D., Chiu, A. S., Sarabi, A., Karthik, S., Li, Y. S., & Burgess, C. R. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61314-y · Cited by 5
Thivierge, J., & Pilzak, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04684-9 · Cited by 3
Altavini, T. S., Conde‐Ocazionez, S., Eriksson, D., Wunderle, T., & Schmidt, K. E. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.048 · Cited by 6
Garrett, D. D., Epp, S. M., Perry, A., & Lindenberger, U. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/184739 · Cited by 5
Gundlach, C., Forschack, N., & Müller, M. M. (2024) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00312 · Cited by 4
Diverse coactive neurons encode stimulus-driven and stimulus-independent variables
Xià, J., Marks, T. D., Goard, M. J., & Weßel, R. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00431.2020 · Cited by 4
What does the mean mean? A simple test for neuroscience
Tlaie, A., Shapcott, K. A., van der Plas, T. L., Rowland, J. M., Lees, R. M., Keeling, J., Packer, A. M., Tiesinga, P. H. E., Schölvinck, M. L., & Havenith, M. N. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012000 · Cited by 4
Activity of primate V1 neurons during the gap saccade task
Kim, K., & Lee, C. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00758.2016 · Cited by 5
The Interplay Between Cortical State and Perceptual Learning: A Focused Review
Kwon, S. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2018.00047 · Cited by 4
Frequency-separated principal component analysis of cortical population activity
Thivierge, J. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00167.2020 · Cited by 4
Interneuronal correlations dynamically adjust to task demands at multiple time-scalesPreprint
Hamed, S. B., Gaillard, C., Ästrand, E., Wardak, C., & Hamed, S. B. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/547802 · Cited by 5
Wolff, A., Chen, L., Tumati, S., Golesorkhi, M., Gómez‐Pilar, J., Hu, J., Jiang, S., Mao, Y. Q., Longtin, A., & Northoff, G. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.09.417774 · Cited by 4
Rapid compensatory plasticity revealed by dynamic correlated activity in monkeys in vivo
Andrei, A. R., Akil, A. E., Kharas, N., Rosenbaum, R., Josić́, K., & Dragoi, V. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01446-w · Cited by 3
State-dependent complexity of the local field potential in the primary visual cortex
Jungmann, R. M., Feliciano, T., Aguiar, L. A. A., Soares‐Cunha, C., Coimbra, B., Rodrigues, A. J., Copelli, M., Matias, F. S., de Vasconcelos, N. A. P., & Carelli, P. V. (2024) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.110.014402 · Cited by 3
Unlocking neural population non-stationarity using a hierarchical dynamics model
Park, M., Bohner, G., & Macke, J. H. (2015) · Cited by 2
Feo, V. D., Boi, F., Safaai, H., Onken, A., Panzeri, S., & Vato, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00269 · Cited by 2
Niknam, K., Akbarian, A., Noudoost, B., & Nategh, N. (2018) · IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1109/globalsip.2018.8646420 · Cited by 2
Wason, T. D. (2021) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104403 · Cited by 2
Nogueira, R., Peltier, N. E., Anzai, A., DeAngelis, G. C., Martínez-Trujillo, J., & Moreno‐Bote, R. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/577379 · Cited by 2
State-dependent changes in perception and coding in the mouse somatosensory cortexPreprint
Lee, C. C. Y., Kheradpezhouh, E., Diamond, M. E., & Arabzadeh, E. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.24.264127 · Cited by 2
Chelaru, M. I., Eagleman, S. L., Andrei, A. R., Milton, R., Kharas, N., & Dragoi, V. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3803611 · Cited by 2
Thoughtful faces: inferring internal states across species using facial featuresPreprint
Tlaie, A., Hay, M. Y. A. E., Mert, B., Taylor, R., Ferracci, P.-A., Shapcott, K. A., Glukhova, M., Pillow, J. W., Havenith, M. N., & Schölvinck, M. L. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4150179/v1 · Cited by 2
Age-related changes in behavioural and neural variability in a decision-making task
Zang, F., Khanal, A., Förster, S., Abbott, L. F., Acerbi, L., Aguillon-Rodriguez, V., Ahmadi, M., Amjad, J., Angelaki, D. E., Arlandis, J., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74227-1 · Cited by 4
Orientation and Distance Dependence of Pairwise Correlation in Macaque V1
Hu, L., Hu, Q., & Chen, Y. (2020) · International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics Engineering (ICBBE) · doi:10.1145/3444884.3444893 · Cited by 1
Palmerston, J. B., & Chan, R. H. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3081118 · Cited by 1
Whiteway, M. R., Socha, K. Z., Bonin, V., & Butts, D. A. (2019) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.10441 · Cited by 1
Parsing and Predicting Increased Noise in Visual Cortex
Fisher, T. G. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0898-15.2015
The Impact of Cortical State on Neural Coding and Behavior
Beaman, C. B. (2016) · Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center)
Comparison of mechanisms for contrast-invariance of orientation selectivity in simple cells
Fortier, P. A. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.01.052
Plasticity and Memory in Cerebral Cortex
Finnie, P. S. B., Bear, M. F., & Cooke, S. F. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21079-1
Inter-Area Communication in the Brain: a Population-Level Approach
Semedo, J. D. (2018) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.1184/r1/6720272
Neuromodulation of Thalamic Sensory Processing of Tactile Stimuli
Rodenkirch, C. (2020) · doi:10.7916/d8-g6pv-0k44
Chicharro, D., Panzeri, S., & Haefner, R. M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54858.sa2
Neural correlates of conscious visual processing
Poland, E. (2021) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-8601
Ribeiro, T. L., Jendrichovsky, P., Yu, S. P., Mártin, D. A., Kanold, P. O., Chialvo, D. R., & Plenz, D. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4102639
Plasticity of Receptive Fields in Auditory Cortex
Kisley, M. A. (2021) · Springer series in computational neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87447-6_12
Brain—global synchronization and its topography
Northoff, G. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821935-5.00025-9
Order in the jungle of consciousness—convergence of theories
Northoff, G. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821935-5.00028-4
Northoff, G. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821935-5.00040-5
Neurodynamic mechanisms of neural variability
Northoff, G. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821935-5.00043-0
Španiel, F., Anýž, J., Grygarová, D., Hubený, J., Koudelka, V., Shalkin, I., Štrobl, J., Hlinka, J., Nagy, T., Jakob, L., et al. (2025) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149964
Sooriyaarachchi, J., Zhan, C. A., & Baker, C. L. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013661
Biophysical and circuit properties underlying population dynamics in neocortical networks
Zerlaut, Y. (2016) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/65c9fe21zd042z4128zbe2bz5b4f3d52fb33
Altwegg‐Boussac, T. (2015) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/b00291fezcae2z498az82e5zaf11f0672b45
Structure and sensitivity of neural population responses in the retina
Gardella, C. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/8c3c933fzb5afz434cz8207z919452629f2d
Spatiotemporal Divergence between Intrinsic and Evoked Cortical Activity Predicts Visual Detection
Jensen, D. R., & Davis, Z. W. (2026) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2304-25.2026
Metadata
- Authors
- Schölvinck, M. L., Saleem, A. B., Benucci, A., Harris, K. D., & Carandini, M.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2015-01-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 170-178
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC4287140
- OpenAlex
- W1969233644
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 16
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Wellcome Trust (095668, 095669)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I005102/1, EP/I005102/2, EP/K015141/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- neural variability, cortical state, primary visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus, spike train correlations, global fluctuations, cortical synchronization, population coding, crystallographic texture
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cats, Female, Nerve Net, Photic Stimulation, Random Allocation, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review