Cited by 131Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Intersubject Variability of and Genetic Effects on the Brain's Functional Connectivity during Infancy

Open access
Gao, Wei, Elton, Amanda, Zhu, Hongtu, Alcauter, Sarael, Smith, J. Keith, Gilmore, John H., Lin, Weili·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Infancy is a period featuring a high level of intersubject variability but the brain basis for such variability and the potential genetic/environmental contributions remain largely unexplored. The assessment of the brain's functional connectivity during infancy by the resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) technique (Biswal et al., 1995) provides a unique means to probe the brain basis of intersubject variability during infancy. In this study, an unusually large typically developing human infant sample including 58 singletons, 132 dizygotic twins, and 98 monozygotic twins with rsfMRI scans during the first 2 years of life was recruited to delineate the spatial and temporal developmental patterns of both the intersubject variability of and genetic effects on the brain's functional connectivity. Through systematic voxelwise functional connectivity analyses, our results revealed that the intersubject variability at birth features lower variability in primary functional areas but higher values in association areas. Although the relative pattern remains largely consistent, the magnitude of intersubject variability undergoes an interesting U-shaped growth during the first 2 years of life. Overall, the intersubject variability patterns during infancy show both adult-like and infant-specific characteristics (Mueller et al., 2013). On the other hand, age-dependent genetic effects were observed showing significant but bidirectional relationships with intersubject variability. The temporal and spatial patterns of the intersubject variability of and genetic contributions to the brain's functional connectivity documented in this study shed light on the largely uncharted functional development of the brain during infancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5072-13.2014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 131

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Johnson MH (1994) Visual attention and the control of eye movements in early infancy. In: Attention and performance XV: conscious and noncon- scious information processing (Umilta C, Moscovitch M, eds), pp 291- 310. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Authors
Gao, W., Elton, A., Zhu, H., Alcauter, S., Smith, J. K., Gilmore, J. H., & Lin, W.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-08-20
Volume
34
Issue
34
Pages
11288-11296
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1995722549
Cited by
131
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Foundation of Hope for Research and Treatment of Mental Illness
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH064065, R01MH070890)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD053000)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
interindividual variability, brain functional connectivity, infancy, genetic factors, dizygotic twins, monozygotic twins, resting state, brain development, association cortex
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Rest, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review