Cellular mechanisms of temporal sensitivity in visual cortex neurons
Open accessAbstract
The ability of cortical neurons to accurately encode the temporal pattern of their inputs has important consequences for cortical function and perceptual acuity. Here we identify cellular mechanisms underlying the sensitivity of cortical neurons to the timing of sensory-evoked synaptic inputs. We find that temporally coincident inputs to layer 4 neurons in primary visual cortex evoke an increase in spike precision and supralinear spike summation. Underlying this nonlinear summation are changes in the evoked excitatory conductance and the associated membrane potential response, and a lengthening of the window between excitation and inhibition. Furthermore, fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons in layer 4 exhibit a shorter window of temporal sensitivity compared with excitatory neurons. In contrast to the enhanced response to synchronous inputs by layer 4 neurons, sensory input integration in downstream cortical layers is more linear and less sensitive to timing. Neurons in the input layer of cortex are thus uniquely optimized to detect and encode synchronous sensory-evoked inputs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thalamo-recipient principal neurons act as coincidence detectors of near-synchronous thalamic input and have improved sensitivity to the temporal distribution of thalamic spiking.
“As a result of this circuit, thalamo-recipient principal neurons act as coincidence detectors of near synchronous thalamic input (Figure 5B) and improve the sensitivity of cortical neurons to the temporal distribution of thalamic spiking activity (Bruno and Sakmann, 2006; Bruno and Simons, 2002; Cardin et al., 2010; Pinto et al., 2000; Pinto et al., 2003)”
From GABAergic Interneurons in the Neocortex: From Cellular Properties to Circuits (2016) · cites this paper as Cardin et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 161 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Cardin, J. A., Kumbhani, R. D., Contreras, D., & Palmer, L. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Palmer, Larry A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-03-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3652-3662
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2880457
- OpenAlex
- W2041575547
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (R01EY016430, R01EY013984, F32EY017501, R01EY020765, K99EY018407, T32EY007035)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- temporal sensitivity, primary visual cortex, membrane potential, fast-spiking interneurons
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cats, Membrane Potentials, Neurons, Time Factors, Visual Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review