The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct Neural Substrates of Duration-Based and Beat-Based Auditory Timing
Open accessAbstract
Research on interval timing strongly implicates the cerebellum and the basal ganglia as part of the timing network of the brain. Here we tested the hypothesis that the brain uses differential timing mechanisms and networks—specifically, that the cerebellum subserves the perception of the absolute duration of time intervals, whereas the basal ganglia mediate perception of time intervals relative to a regular beat. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, we asked human subjects to judge the difference in duration of two successive time intervals as a function of the preceding context of an irregular sequence of clicks (where the task relies on encoding the absolute duration of time intervals) or a regular sequence of clicks (where the regular beat provides an extra cue for relative timing). We found significant activations in an olivocerebellar network comprising the inferior olive, vermis, and deep cerebellar nuclei including the dentate nucleus during absolute, duration-based timing and a striato-thalamo-cortical network comprising the putamen, caudate nucleus, thalamus, supplementary motor area, premotor cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during relative, beat-based timing. Our results support two distinct timing mechanisms and underlying subsystems: first, a network comprising the inferior olive and the cerebellum that acts as a precision clock to mediate absolute, duration-based timing, and second, a distinct network for relative, beat-based timing incorporating a striato-thalamo-cortical network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm
Ashburner, J. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007 · Cited by 8,122
Basal-ganglia 'Projections' to the Prefrontal Cortex of the Primate
Middleton, F. A. (2002) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/12.9.926 · Cited by 451 · cited 1×
“The DLPFC receives inputs from both the dentate nucleus of the cerebellum (Middleton and Strick, 2001) and the basal ganglia (Middleton and Strick, 2002).”
Background
Cited by
Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012).
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2 · Cited by 1,204
Properties of the Internal Clock: First- and Second-Order Principles of Subjective Time
Allman, M. J., Teki, S., Griffiths, T. D., & Meck, W. H. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115117 · Cited by 388
Self-citationDelta–Beta Coupled Oscillations Underlie Temporal Prediction Accuracy
Arnal, L. H., Doelling, K. B., & Poeppel, D. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu103 · Cited by 357
Noreika, V., Falter, C. M., & Rubia, K. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.036 · Cited by 339
Proactive Sensing of Periodic and Aperiodic Auditory Patterns
Rimmele, J. M., Morillon, B., Poeppel, D., & Arnal, L. H. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.003 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Teki, S., Grube, M., Kumar, S., & Griffiths, T. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-03-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3805-3812
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2020570342
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct Neural Substrates of Duration-Based and Beat-Based Auditory Timing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.5561-10.2011
- The paper
- Teki, S., Grube, M., Kumar, S., & Griffiths, T. D. (2011). Distinct Neural Substrates of Duration-Based and Beat-Based Auditory Timing. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5561-10.2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.