Cited by 133Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Longitudinal evidence for functional specialization of the neural circuit supporting working memory in the human brain

Open access
Finn, Amy S., Sheridan, Margaret A., Kam, Carla L. Hudson, Hinshaw, Stephen, D'Esposito, Mark·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Although children perform more poorly than adults on many cognitive measures, they are better able to learn things such as language and music. These differences could result from the delayed specialization of neural circuits and asynchronies in the maturation of neural substrates required for learning. Working memory—the ability to hold information in mind that is no longer present in the environment—comprises a set of cognitive processes required for many, if not all, forms of learning. A critical neural substrate for working memory (the prefrontal cortex) continues to mature through early adulthood. What are the functional consequences of this late maturation for working memory? Using a longitudinal design, we show that although individuals recruit prefrontal cortex as expected during both early and late adolescence during a working memory task, this recruitment is correlated with behavior only in late adolescence. The hippocampus is also recruited, but only during early, and not late, adolescence. Moreover, the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex are coactive in early adolescence regardless of task demands or performance, in contrast to the pattern seen in late adolescents and adults, when these regions are coactive only under high task demands. Together, these data demonstrate that neural circuitry underlying working memory changes during adolescent development. The diminishing contribution of the hippocampus in working memory function with age is an important observation that informs questions about how children and adults learn differently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.6266-09.2010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Truly longitudinal studies following brain and behavior or clinical symptoms within the same adolescents over time are especially scarce.

    “a particular paucity of truly longitudinal studies that have tracked changes in brain and behavior or clinical symptomatology over time within individuals across adolescence (with notable recent exceptions) [31,59,60,83-85].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 133

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cowan N 2005 Working memory capacity: essays in cognitive psychology New York Psychology Press; Taylor & Francis Group

Authors
Finn, A. S., Sheridan, M. A., Kam, C. L. H., Hinshaw, S., & D'Esposito, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-08-18
Volume
30
Issue
33
Pages
11062-11067
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2021556514
Cited by
133
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (NS40813)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063901, MH 63901)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS40813, P01NS040813)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, adolescent brain development, neural circuit maturation, functional specialization, task demands, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Prefrontal Cortex, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review