A three-year longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of performance monitoring and test-retest reliability from childhood to early adulthood
Open accessAbstract
Previous cross-sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that performance monitoring functions continue to develop well into adolescence, associated with increased activation in brain regions important for cognitive control (prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and parietal cortex). To date, however, the development of performance monitoring has not yet been studied longitudinally, which leaves open the question whether changes can be detected within individuals over time. In the present study, human boys and girls, between ages 8 and 27 years, performed a child-friendly rule-switch task in the scanner on two occasions ∼3.5 years apart. Change versus stability was examined using two methods: (1) repeated-measures analyses and (2) test-retest reliabilities of blood oxygenation level-dependent responses. Results showed that with increasing age, participants performed better on the task. The changes in neural activation associated with the processing of performance feedback were, however, more reliably correlated with changes in performance than with age. Test-retest reliability was at least fair to good for adults and adolescents, but poor to fair for the youngest age group. Substantially more variability was observed in the pattern and magnitude of children compared with adults, which may be interpreted as proxy for developmental change. Together, the results show that (1) change within individuals is variable, and more so for children than for adolescents and adults, and (2) performance is a better predictor for change in neural activation over time. These findings set the stage for studying developmental change in the perspective of multiple predictors, rather than solely by divisions based on age groups.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activity patterns across prefrontal and subcortical regions are influenced by task performance, task design, and data analysis techniques.
“other key factors besides development are known to influence patterns of activity across prefrontal and subcortical regions. These include (i) task performance [60], (ii) task design, including transient-event versus sustained-set paradigms [6] or different baseline and timing conditions [28,61], and (iii) various data analysis techniques.”
From Arrested development? Reconsidering dual-systems models of brain function in adolescence and disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [60]
Truly longitudinal studies following brain and behavior or clinical symptoms within the same adolescents over time are especially scarce.
“a particular paucity of truly longitudinal studies that have tracked changes in brain and behavior or clinical symptomatology over time within individuals across adolescence (with notable recent exceptions) [31,59,60,83-85].”
From Arrested development? Reconsidering dual-systems models of brain function in adolescence and disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [60]
In contrast to children, adolescents and adults showed fair to good reliabilities for activations in a variety of brain regions during a rule-switch task separated by ∼3.5 years.
“Nevertheless, Koolschijn et al. (2011) observed that, in contrast to children (N = 10), adolescents (N = 12) and adults (N = 10) showed fair (ICCs = .41–.59) to good (ICCs = .60–.74) reliabilities for activations in a variety of brain regions (e.g., precuneus, ACC, insula, inferior and superior parietal cortices, angular gyrus) during a rule-switch task separated by ∼3.5 years.”
From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Koolschijn et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 83
- Authors
- Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., Schel, M. A., de Rooij, M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-03-16
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4204-4212
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6623527
- OpenAlex
- W1993753641
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- performance monitoring, cognitive control, developmental changes, test-retest reliability, children, adolescents, early adulthood, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review