Cited by 83Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

A three-year longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of performance monitoring and test-retest reliability from childhood to early adulthood

Open access
Koolschijn, P. Cédric M. P., Schel, Margot A., de Rooij, Mark, Rombouts, Serge A. R. B., Crone, Eveline A.·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous cross-sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that performance monitoring functions continue to develop well into adolescence, associated with increased activation in brain regions important for cognitive control (prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and parietal cortex). To date, however, the development of performance monitoring has not yet been studied longitudinally, which leaves open the question whether changes can be detected within individuals over time. In the present study, human boys and girls, between ages 8 and 27 years, performed a child-friendly rule-switch task in the scanner on two occasions ∼3.5 years apart. Change versus stability was examined using two methods: (1) repeated-measures analyses and (2) test-retest reliabilities of blood oxygenation level-dependent responses. Results showed that with increasing age, participants performed better on the task. The changes in neural activation associated with the processing of performance feedback were, however, more reliably correlated with changes in performance than with age. Test-retest reliability was at least fair to good for adults and adolescents, but poor to fair for the youngest age group. Substantially more variability was observed in the pattern and magnitude of children compared with adults, which may be interpreted as proxy for developmental change. Together, the results show that (1) change within individuals is variable, and more so for children than for adolescents and adults, and (2) performance is a better predictor for change in neural activation over time. These findings set the stage for studying developmental change in the perspective of multiple predictors, rather than solely by divisions based on age groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.6415-10.2011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activity patterns across prefrontal and subcortical regions are influenced by task performance, task design, and data analysis techniques.

    “other key factors besides development are known to influence patterns of activity across prefrontal and subcortical regions. These include (i) task performance [60], (ii) task design, including transient-event versus sustained-set paradigms [6] or different baseline and timing conditions [28,61], and (iii) various data analysis techniques.”
  • Truly longitudinal studies following brain and behavior or clinical symptoms within the same adolescents over time are especially scarce.

    “a particular paucity of truly longitudinal studies that have tracked changes in brain and behavior or clinical symptomatology over time within individuals across adolescence (with notable recent exceptions) [31,59,60,83-85].”
  • In contrast to children, adolescents and adults showed fair to good reliabilities for activations in a variety of brain regions during a rule-switch task separated by ∼3.5 years.

    “Nevertheless, Koolschijn et al. (2011) observed that, in contrast to children (N = 10), adolescents (N = 12) and adults (N = 10) showed fair (ICCs = .41–.59) to good (ICCs = .60–.74) reliabilities for activations in a variety of brain regions (e.g., precuneus, ACC, insula, inferior and superior parietal cortices, angular gyrus) during a rule-switch task separated by ∼3.5 years.”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Koolschijn et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 83

Authors
Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., Schel, M. A., de Rooij, M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-03-16
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
4204-4212
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1993753641
Cited by
83
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
performance monitoring, cognitive control, developmental changes, test-retest reliability, children, adolescents, early adulthood, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review