The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2939044 · Cited by 2,657
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000144 · Cited by 1,028
Delegating powers: a transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-6536 · Cited by 910
Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries: The RIT Model
Abbott, K. W., Levi-faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716216688272 · Cited by 304
Cross-National Sources of Regulatory Policymaking in Europe and the United States
Majone, G. (1991) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x00004943 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1985-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W584474240
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/9780520313651
- The paper
- Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences. (1985). University of California Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520313651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
