Cited by 139History of Medicine StudiesHistory of Science and MedicineHistory of Medicine and Tropical Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘The Ambiguities of Medical Revivalism in Modern India’

Leslie, Charles·1976·Asian Medical Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/9780520322295-022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 139

Metadata

Authors
Leslie, C.
Corresponding author
Leslie, Charles
Venue
Asian Medical Systems
Published
1976-12-31
Pages
356-367
OpenAlex
W3135015244
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
115.17
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of California Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
Keywords
Western medicine, Indian medicine, medical reform, history of medicine, colonial medicine, medical pluralism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘The Ambiguities of Medical Revivalism in Modern India’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/9780520322295-022
The paper
Leslie, C. (1976). ‘The Ambiguities of Medical Revivalism in Modern India’. Asian Medical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520322295-022